Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vaccine ; 36(38): 5725-5731, 2018 09 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30122648

RESUMO

To clarify the protective effect of one-dose mumps-containing vaccines (MuCV) in mainland China, the antigenic variations of HN gene and cross-neutralization capacities between MuCV and wild type genotype F MuVs were studied. In total, 70 HN gene sequences of genotype F MuV representative strains obtained from 2001 to 2015, two types of MuCV strains, 139 pairs of pre- and post-vaccination serum samples from infants receiving one dose of MuCV vaccination were analyzed. Genotype-specific amino acid variations were observed in the potential antigenic epitopes between MuCV and wild-type genotype F MuVs circulating in mainland China. The mumps neutralization antibody titers induced by one-dose MuCV were found to be generally low. Moreover, significant differences in neutralization titers were observed between vaccine and wild-type strains. It could be concluded that one-dose MuCV had a cross-protective effect against the wild-type genotype F MuVs, but its effectiveness was limited, which might be caused by insufficient doses of MuCV vaccination and the genotype-specific antigenic differences between vaccine and wild-type MuVs as well. In addition, a poor linear correlation between mumps-specific IgG concentrations and neutralization titers was observed in this study, indicating the concentration of MuV-specific IgG could not fully reflect the neutralizing antibody titer in serum. Therefore, it is highly recommended to provide a second dose of MuCV to preschool children to increase MuV neutralizing antibody titers and use MuV cross-neutralization test as preferred tool for assessment of mumps-containing vaccine effectiveness on wild-type MuVs. This is the first report to assess the effectiveness of one-dose Chinese MuCV against wild-type genotype F MuVs, which would be benefit for the development of mumps vaccination strategy.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Imunização Secundária/métodos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Vacina contra Caxumba/imunologia , Vírus da Caxumba/imunologia , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Variação Antigênica/genética , Variação Antigênica/imunologia , Pré-Escolar , China , Epitopos/imunologia , Genótipo , Proteína HN/genética , Proteína HN/imunologia , Humanos , Lactente , Caxumba/imunologia , Testes de Neutralização , Vacinação
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 12: 189, 2012 Aug 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22891685

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Existing standard non-molecular diagnostic methods such as viral culture and immunofluorescent (DFA) are time-consuming, labor intensive or limited sensitivity. Several multiplex molecular assays are costly. Therefore, there is a need for the development of a rapid and sensitive diagnosis of respiratory viral pathogens. METHODS: A GeXP-based multiplex RT-PCR assay (GeXP assay) was developed to detect simultaneously sixteen different respiratory virus types/subtypes. Seventeen sets of chimeric primers were used to initiate the RT-PCR, and one pair of universal primers was used for the subsequent cycles of the RT-PCR. The specificity of the GeXP assay was examined with positive controls for each virus type/subtype. The sensitivity was evaluated by performing the assay on serial ten-fold dilutions of in vitro-transcribed RNA of all RNA viruses and the plasmids containing the Adv and HBoV target sequence. GeXP assay was further evaluated using 126 clinical specimens and compared with Luminex xTAG RVP Fast assay. RESULTS: The GeXP assay achieved a sensitivity of 20-200 copies for a single virus and 1000 copies when all of the 16 pre-mixed viral targets were present. Analyses of 126 clinical specimens using the GeXP assay demonstrated that GeXP assay and the RVP Fast assay were in complete agreement for 109/126 (88.51%) of the specimens. GeXP assay was more sensitive than the RVP Fast assay for the detection of HRV and PIV3, and slightly less sensitive for the detection of HMPV, Adv, RSVB and HBoV. The whole process of the GeXP assay for the detection of 12 samples was completed within 2.5 hours. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the GeXP assay is a rapid, cost-effective, sensitive, specific and high throughput method for the detection of respiratory virus infections.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/métodos , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa/métodos , Viroses/diagnóstico , Vírus/classificação , Vírus/isolamento & purificação , Análise Custo-Benefício , Primers do DNA/genética , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/economia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/economia , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa/economia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fatores de Tempo , Virologia/economia , Virologia/métodos , Viroses/virologia , Vírus/genética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA