Is there a role for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of biological aortic valves?

Patients with biological aortic valves (following either surgical aortic valve replacement [SAVR] or trans catheter aortic valve implantation [TAVI]) require lifelong follow-up with an imaging modality to assess prosthetic valve function and dysfunction. Echocardiography is currently the first-line imaging modality to assess biological aortic valves. In this review, we discuss the potential role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) as an additional imaging modality in situations of inconclusive or equivocal echocardiography. Planimetry of the prosthetic orifice can theoretically be measured, as well as the effective orifice area, with potential limitations, such as CMR valve-related artefacts and calcifications in degenerated prostheses. The true benefit of CMR is its ability to accurately quantify aortic regurgitation (paravalvular and intra-valvular) with a direct and reproducible method independent of regurgitant jet morphology to accurately assess reverse remodelling and non-invasively detect focal and interstitial diffuse myocardial fibrosis. Following SAVR or TAVI for aortic stenosis, interstitial diffuse fibrosis can regress, accompanied by structural and functional improvement that CMR can accurately assess.

The evolving role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the assessment of mitral valve prolapse.

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP), characterized by a displacement > 2 mm above the mitral annulus of one or both bileaflets, with or without leaflet thickening, is a common valvular heart disease, with a prevalence of approximately 2% in western countries. Although this population has a generally good overall prognosis, MVP can be associated with mitral regurgitation (MR), left ventricular (LV) remodeling leading to heart failure, ventricular arrhythmia, and, the most devastating complication, sudden cardiac death, especially in myxomatous bileaflet prolapse (Barlow's disease). Among several prognostic factors reported in the literature, LV fibrosis and mitral annular disjunction may act as an arrhythmogenic substrate in this population. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as a reliable tool for assessing MVP, MR severity, LV remodeling, and fibrosis. Indeed, CMR is the gold standard imaging modality to assess ventricular volume, function, and wall motion abnormalities; it allows accurate calculation of the regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction in MR using a combination of LV volumetric measurement and aortic flow quantification, independent of regurgitant jet morphology and valid in cases of multiple valvulopathies. Moreover, CMR is a unique imaging modality that can assess non-invasively focal and diffuse fibrosis using late gadolinium enhancement sequences and, more recently, T1 mapping. This review describes the use of CMR in patients with MVP and its role in identifying patients at high risk of ventricular arrhythmia.

Comparison of Mitral Regurgitant Volume Assessment between Proximal Flow Convergence and Volumetric Methods in Patients with Significant Primary Mitral Regurgitation: An Echocardiographic and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

BACKGROUND: Discrepancies have been observed between transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) severity grading in primary mitral regurgitation (MR). OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare mitral regurgitant volume (RVol) determined by the TTE proximal flow convergence (proximal isovelocity surface area [PISA]) method and by volumetric methods (TTE and CMR) and to study the relationship between left ventricle (LV) size and RVol obtained by either the PISA or volumetric methods. METHODS: Two centers prospectively recruited 188 patients with at least moderate to severe primary MR due to prolapse in sinus rhythm who underwent TTE and CMR examinations. Regurgitant volume was estimated by either PISA (PISA-RVol) or volumetric methods (LV total stroke volume-systolic aortic forward outflow volume) using either CMR (CMR-RVol) or TTE (TTE-RVol). RESULTS: The PISA-RVol was weakly correlated with CMR-RVol and TTE-RVol (r = 0.29 and 0.30, respectively; P < .001 for both). On multivariable analysis, smaller CMR-left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and absence of mitral annular disjunction independently correlated with increased magnitude of RVol difference between PISA and volumetric methods. While PISA-RVol and LVEDV were unrelated, CMR-RVol and TTE-RVol moderately correlated with LVEDV (r = 0.66 and 0.68, respectively; P < .001 for both). In contrast, LVEDV and regurgitant fraction (RVol/LV total stroke volume), assessed with either TTE or CMR, were poorly correlated (r = 0.17, P = .02; and r = 0.12, P = .10, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Mitral RVol values estimated by PISA and volumetric methods are not directly comparable. The expected proportional relationship between volumetric RVol and LV size, which was not observed with PISA-RVol, suggests that PISA-RVol would be inaccurate. Given that RVol assessed with volumetric methods depends on LV size, determination of a unique RVol threshold for severe MR is challenging. In contrast to RVol, calculating regurgitant fraction by volumetric methods allows the quantification of MR severity independently from LV size.

Is ticagrelor worth its high cost and side-effects?

Ticagrelor is a reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonist that is more potent than clopidogrel. When used in combination with aspirin, it reduces cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, unbiased review of 5 randomised controlled trials indicates that although statistically significant, the clinical superiority of ticagrelor over clopidogrel is modest. Thus, identification of patients who benefit the most from ticagrelor is a priority. Besides bleeding issues, ticagrelor can frequently cause bouts of dyspnoea, which requires ticagrelor replacement by another P2Y12 receptor antagonist, with a loading dose.

Assessment of left ventricular size and function by 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: Impact of the echocardiography platform and analysis software.

BACKGROUND: Whether echocardiography platform and analysis software impact left ventricular (LV) volumes, ejection fraction (EF), and stroke volume (SV) by transthoracic tridimensional echocardiography (3DE) has not yet been assessed. Hence, our aim was to compare 3DE LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (EDV and ESV), LVEF, and SV obtained with echocardiography platform from 2 different manufacturers. METHODS: 3DE was performed in 84 patients (65% of screened consecutive patients), with equipment from 2 different manufacturers, with subsequent off-line postprocessing to obtain parameters of LV function and size (Philips QLAB 3DQ and General Electric EchoPAC 4D autoLVQ). Twenty-five patients with clinical indication for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging served as a validation subgroup. RESULTS: LVEDV and LVESV from 2 vendors were highly correlated (r = 0.93), but compared with 4D autoLVQ, the use of Qlab 3DQ resulted in lower LVEDV and LVESV (bias: 11 mL, limits of agreement: -25 to +47 and bias: 6 mL, limits of agreement: -22 to +34, respectively). The agreement between LVEF values of each software was poor (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.62) despite no or minimal bias. SVs were also lower with Qlab 3DQ advanced compared with 4D autoLVQ, and both were poorly correlated (r = 0.66). Consistently, the underestimation of LVEDV, LVESV, and SV by 3DE compared with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was more pronounced with Philips QLAB 3DQ advanced than with 4D autoLVQ. CONCLUSIONS: The echocardiography platform and analysis software significantly affect the values of LV parameters obtained by 3DE. Intervendor standardization and improvements in 3DE modalities are needed to broaden the use of LV parameters obtained by 3DE in clinical practice.

Quantitative assessment of primary mitral regurgitation using left ventricular volumes obtained with new automated three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic software: A comparison with 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative assessment of primary mitral regurgitation (MR) using left ventricular (LV) volumes obtained with three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (3D TTE) recently showed encouraging results. Nevertheless, 3D TTE is not incorporated into everyday practice, as current LV chamber quantification software products are time consuming. AIMS: To investigate the accuracy and reproducibility of new automated fast 3D TTE software (HeartModelA.I.; Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA, USA) for the quantification of LV volumes and MR severity in patients with isolated degenerative primary MR; and to compare regurgitant volume (RV) obtained with 3D TTE with a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) reference. METHODS: Fifty-three patients (37 men; mean age 64±12 years) with at least mild primary isolated MR, and having comprehensive 3D TTE and CMR studies within 24h, were eligible for inclusion. MR RV was calculated using the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method and the volumetric method (total LV stroke volume minus aortic stroke volume) with either CMR or 3D TTE. RESULTS: Inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of 3D TTE was excellent (coefficient of variation≤10%) for LV volumes. MR RV was similar using CMR and 3D TTE (57±23mL vs 56±28mL; P=0.22), but was significantly higher using the PISA method (69±30mL; P<0.05 compared with CMR and 3D TTE). The PISA method consistently overestimated MR RV compared with CMR (bias 12±21mL), while no significant bias was found between 3D TTE and CMR (bias 2±14mL). Concordance between echocardiography and CMR was higher using 3D TTE MR grading (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=0.89) than with PISA MR grading (ICC=0.78). Complete agreement with CMR grading was more frequent with 3D TTE than with the PISA method (76% vs 63%). CONCLUSION: 3D TTE RV assessment using the new generation of automated software correlates well with CMR in patients with isolated degenerative primary MR.

Prospective assessment of the frequency of low gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: Critical impact of aortic flow misalignment and pressure recovery phenomenon.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of paradoxical low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (AS) varies widely across studies. The impact of misalignment of aortic flow and pressure recovery phenomenon on the frequency of low-gradient severe AS with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has not been evaluated in prospective studies. AIMS: To investigate prospectively the impact of aortic flow misalignment by Doppler and lack of pressure recovery phenomenon correction on the frequency of low-gradient (LG) severe aortic stenosis (AS) with preserved LVEF. METHODS: Aortic jet velocities and mean pressure gradient (MPG) were obtained by interrogating all windows in 68 consecutive patients with normal LVEF and severe AS (aortic valve area [AVA] ≤1cm2) on the basis of the apical imaging window alone (two-dimensional [2D] apical approach). Patients were classified as having LG or high-gradient (HG) AS according to MPG <40mmHg or ≥40mmHg, and normal flow (NF) or low flow (LF) according to stroke volume index >35mL/m2 or ≤35mL/m2, on the basis of the 2D apical approach, the multiview approach (multiple windows evaluation) and AVA corrected for pressure recovery. RESULTS: The proportion of LG severe AS was 57% using the 2D apical approach alone. After the multiview approach and correction for pressure recovery, the proportion of LG severe AS decreased from 57% to 13% (LF-LG severe AS decreased from 23% to 3%; NF-LG severe AS decreased from 34% to 10%). As a result, 25% of patients were reclassified as having HG severe AS (AVA ≤1cm2 and MPG ≥40mmHg) and 19% as having moderate AS. Hence, 77% of patients initially diagnosed with LG severe AS did not have "true" LG severe AS when the multiview approach and the pressure recovery phenomenon correction were used. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic flow misevaluation, resulting from lack of use of multiple windows evaluation and pressure recovery phenomenon correction, accounts for a large proportion of incorrectly graded AS and considerable overestimation of the frequency of LG severe AS with preserved LVEF.

Functional anatomy and pathophysiologic principles in mitral regurgitation: Non-invasive assessment.

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most prevalent cause of valvular heart disease (VHD) in western countries. In the Euro Heart Survey on VHD, MR was the second most common heart VHD requiring surgery. It is also the most common form of VHD in community and population-based studies from the United States. The categorization of MR based on causes and mechanisms is a major determinant of clinical outcome, of possible therapies for the MR and of the effectiveness of these therapies. Surgical mitral valve (MV) repair has been shown to improve survival in patients with severe primary MR compared with MV replacement. In addition, new percutaneous repair and replacement procedures have been recently developed. Hence, accurate understanding of the functional anatomy of the MV and the pathophysiologic principles underlying MR is needed to appropriately target valve lesions. Recent advances in cardiac imaging have allowed to deeply strengthen the knowledge of the function of the MV. The present review aims at describing the functional anatomy and pathophysiology of MR through different cardiac imaging modalities.

Quantitative assessment of aortic regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography: Usefulness of the comparison of aortic and pulmonary flows.

AIMS: Patients with significant (3+/4+) aortic regurgitation (AR) require careful monitoring or valve surgery. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of aortic and pulmonary flow comparison in identifying patients with significant AR, by echocardiography. METHOD: Two hundred forty-six patients with more than trivial AR were prospectively enrolled from three centers. Aortic regurgitation (AR) severity was assessed by an expert using the currently recommended integrative approach. Aortic and pulmonary flows were independently assessed by another investigator to calculate the regurgitant fraction (RF), the aortic to pulmonary flow ratio (Qao/Qp) and the aortic to pulmonary velocity-time integral (VTIao/VTIp) ratio. The control group consisted of 195 patients without AR. RESULTS: A significant correlation was observed between AR grading and RF (r = .82, P < .0001) and Qao/Qp (r = .81, P < .0001), but the correlation was modest for VTIao/VTIp ratio (r = .63; P < .0001). The accuracy of RF and Qao/Qp ratio to identify patients with significant AR was excellent (0.96 and 0.95, respectively), but was significantly lower for VTIao/VTIp ratio at 0.82. A RF > 40% indicated grade 3 or 4 AR with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 93%. A Qao/Qp ratio > 1.6 indicated grade 3 or 4 AR with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 89%. The VTIao/VTIp ratio was not helpful in identifying patients with significant AR, as a wide overlap was found between 1+/2+ and 3+/4+ patients. CONCLUSION: Regurgitant fraction (RF) and Qao/Qp are helpful in identifying significant AR. The assessment of Doppler aortic/pulmonary flow should be incorporated in the comprehensive evaluation of AR.

Correction: Asymptomatic aortic stenosis: An assessment of patients' and of their general practitioners' knowledge, after an indexed specialized assessment in community practice.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179988.].

Performance of new automated transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiographic software for left ventricular volumes and function assessment in routine clinical practice: Comparison with 3 Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is superior to two-dimensional Simpson's method for assessment of left ventricular (LV) volumes and LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Nevertheless, 3D TTE is not incorporated into everyday practice, as current LV chamber quantification software products are time-consuming. AIMS: To evaluate the feasibility, accuracy and reproducibility of new fully automated fast 3D TTE software (HeartModelA.I.; Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA, USA) for quantification of LV volumes and LVEF in routine practice; to compare the 3D LV volumes and LVEF obtained with a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) reference; and to optimize automated default border settings with CMR as reference. METHODS: Sixty-three consecutive patients, who had comprehensive 3D TTE and CMR examinations within 24hours, were eligible for inclusion. Nine patients (14%) were excluded because of insufficient echogenicity in the 3D TTE. Thus, 54 patients (40 men; mean age 63±13 years) were prospectively included into the study. RESULTS: The inter- and intraobserver reproducibilities of 3D TTE were excellent (coefficient of variation<10%) for end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV) and LVEF. Despite a slight underestimation of EDV using 3D TTE compared with CMR (bias=-22±34mL; P<0.0001), a significant correlation was found between the two measurements (r=0.93; P=0.0001). Enlarging default border detection settings leads to frequent volume overestimation in the general population, but improved agreement with CMR in patients with LVEF≤50%. Correlations between 3D TTE and CMR for ESV and LVEF were excellent (r=0.93 and r=0.91, respectively; P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: 3D TTE using new-generation fully automated software is a feasible, fast, reproducible and accurate imaging modality for LV volumetric quantification in routine practice. Optimization of border detection settings may increase agreement with CMR for EDV assessment in dilated ventricles.

Asymptomatic aortic stenosis: An assessment of patients' and of their general practitioners' knowledge, after an indexed specialized assessment in community practice.

BACKGROUND: Clinical and echocardiography follow-up is recommended in patients with aortic stenosis to detect symptom onset, thus a watchful waiting approach has to be safe and effective. For both AS patients and their general practitioners, evaluation of valvular heart disease (VHD) knowledge, after the indexed specialized assessment has never been measured. AIMS: To evaluate the knowledge of clinical symptoms of aortic stenosis by both patients and their general practitioner. METHODS: Sixty-four patients, with moderate to severe and initially asymptomatic AS (median AVA (interquartile range) 1.01(0.80-1.15) cm2) previously referred to a tertiary center and medically managed for at least 6 months after the index echocardiogram, and their primary care doctors were interviewed on the phone and asked to answer specific questions related to knowledge of aortic stenosis symptoms. RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of patients quoted shortness of breath as one of the aortic stenosis symptoms, and only 16% knew the 3 aortic stenosis symptoms. Fifty percent of patients reported having received sufficient information regarding aortic stenosis; only 48% remembered receiving information regarding specific symptoms. Only 14% general practitioners quoted the 3 specific symptoms. According to the initial recommendation, only 41 patients (64%) benefitted from a 6-to-12 month clinical and echocardiography follow up. CONCLUSION: GPs are not sufficiently trained to safely manage AS patients in the community and to ensure adequate follow-up and monitoring. AS patients were not properly informed about their diagnosis and symptomatology. Hence, therapeutic education should be improved for patients with asymptomatic AS and continuous medical education on VHD should be reinforced, for GPs.

Quantitative assessment of primary mitral regurgitation using left ventricular volumes: a three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic pilot study.

AIMS: To investigate the value of assessment of mitral regurgitant fraction (RF) using left ventricular (LV) volumes obtained by three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) to quantify primary mitral regurgitation (MR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty patients with primary MR in sinus rhythm were prospectively enrolled. RF was calculated using either 2DE or 3DE LV volumes obtained as follows: (LV total stroke volume - LV forward stroke volume by Doppler)/LV total stroke volume. Severity of MR was graded independently by two cardiologists blinded to LV volumetric data using an integrative approach, as recommended by current guidelines. Sixty patients with LV ejection fraction >50% and no MR were also studied. In patients without MR, 3D total LV stroke volume was more strongly correlated with LV forward stroke volume than 2D total LV stroke volume (r = 0.75, P < 0.0001 vs. r = 0.62, P < 0.0001, respectively). The 3D method had a feasibility of 90% in patients with MR. Inter-reader concordance for MR grading (four grades) was excellent with a Kappa-value of 0.90, P < 0.0001. A significant correlation was observed between grade of MR severity and 3D RF (r = 0.83, P < 0.0001) and 2D RF (r = 0.74, P < 0.0001). Comparisons between individual grades for 3D RF were significant (P < 0.05) except for 3+ vs. 4+ MR (P = 0.213). All patients with 3D RF ≥40% had ≥3+ or 4+ MR and those with 3D RF ≤30% had 1+ or 2+ MR with a 'grey' overlap zone between 30 and 40%. CONCLUSIONS: RF can be routinely determined using 3D LV volumes with a high feasibility in patients with primary MR and is reliable for identification of Grade 3+ or Grade 4+ MR. The incorporation of this parameter into the currently recommended multiparametric integrative approach might be helpful to discriminate significant MR.

Anaemia to predict outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Owing to the heterogeneous population of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), risk stratification with tools such as the GRACE risk score is recommended to guide therapeutic management and improve outcome. AIM: To evaluate whether anaemia refines the value of the GRACE risk model to predict midterm outcome after an ACS. METHODS: A prospective registry of 1064 ACS patients (63 ± 14 years; 73% men; 57% ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [MI]) was studied. Anaemia was defined as haemoglobin less than 13 mg/dL in men or less than 12 mg/dL in women. The primary endpoint was 6-month death or rehospitalization for MI. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was reached in 132 patients, including 68 deaths. Anaemia was associated with adverse clinical outcomes (hazard ratio 3.008, 95% confidence interval 2.137-4.234; P<0.0001) in univariate analysis and remained independently associated with outcome after adjustment for the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score (hazard ratio 2.870, 95% confidence interval 1.815-4.538; P<0.0001). Anaemia provided additional prognostic information to the GRACE score as demonstrated by a systematic improvement in global model fit and discrimination (c-statistic increasing from 0.633 [0.571;0.696] to 0.697 [0.638;0.755]). Subsequently, adding anaemia to the GRACE score led to reclassification of 595 patients into different risk categories; 16.5% patients at low risk (≤ 5% risk of death or rehospitalization for MI) were upgraded to intermediate (>5-10%) or high risk (>10%); 79.5% patients at intermediate risk were reclassified as low (55%) or high risk (24%); and 45.5% patients at high risk were downgraded to intermediate risk. Overall, 174 patients were reclassified into a higher risk category (17.3%) and 421 into a lower risk category (41.9%). CONCLUSION: Anaemia provides independent additional prognostic information to the GRACE score. Combining anaemia with the GRACE score refines its predictive value, which often overestimates the risk.

Reoperation after the Ross procedure: incidence, management, and survival.

BACKGROUND: The risk of reoperation on the autograft and homograft is the major long-term drawback of the Ross procedure. The incidence and clinical implications of reoperations after the Ross procedure are reported. METHODS: Between March 1992 and February 2010, 336 consecutive patients had a Ross procedure (mean follow-up, 6.2±4.9 years). Autograft implant technique was freestanding root replacement in 269 patients, subcoronary implantation in 52 patients and a modified root replacement with the autograft included in a Valsalva tube graft in 15. RESULTS: Subsequently, 38 patients (11.3%) underwent reoperations, for autograft dilatation in 23 and a significant autograft insufficiency in 9, at 9.6±3.7 years and 2.6±3.9 years, respectively. Aortic and pulmonary infective endocarditis occurred in 3 patients. Three patients underwent a non valve-related cardiac reoperation. Three patients received a transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation after 12.2±1.7 years. At 15 years, freedoms for autograft and homograft explantation (with 95% confidence interval) were 83.3% (77.4%- to 9.2%) and 92.8% (87.6% to 97.9%), respectively. Native aortic valve regurgitation, indexed aortic annulus diameter exceeding 1.35 cm/m2 and autograft diameter were risk factors for dilated autograft reoperation (hazard ratio, 3.23 [95% confidence interval, 1.19 to 8.81], p=0.02; 3.83 [0.9 to 16.33], p=0.07 and 1.2 per mm [1.01 to 1.41], p=0.03), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Autograft dilatation was the leading cause of reoperation in patients who underwent root replacement. Long-term follow-up is mandatory to determine whether modifications of the operative technique could limit autograft dilatation.

Pivotal role of bedside Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of patients with acute heart failure and mitral regurgitation.

Patients presenting with mitral regurgitation and acute heart failure remain a challenge for the clinicians. Bedside echocardiography ascertains the functional or primary nature of mitral regurgitation, thereby allowing to focus therapy on the left ventricle and mitral valve apparatus in patients with functional mitral regurgitation and to hasten mitral valve repair or replacement when acute heart failure results from primary mitral regurgitation. This short article reviews the evaluation by bedside echocardiography to guide management of these patients.