Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 46(11): 2074-2082, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32938568

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The majority of cancer patients report malnutrition, with a significant impact on patient's outcome. This study aimed to compare how nutritional assessment is conducted across different surgical oncology sub-specialties. METHODS: Survey modules were designed for breast, hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB), upper-gastrointestinal (UGI), sarcoma, peritoneal and surface malignancies (PSM) and colorectal cancer (CRC) surgeries to describe 4 domains: participants' setting, evaluation of clinical factors, use of screening tools and clinical practice. Results were compared among sub-specialties and according to human development index (HDI) in the largest cohorts. RESULTS: Out of 457 answers from 377 global participants (62% European), 35.0% were from breast and 28.9% were from CRC surgeons. Although MDTs management is consistently reported (64-88%), the presence of a nutritionist/dietician ranges from 14.1% to 44.2%. Breast surgeons seldom evaluate albumin (25.6%) and weight loss (30.6%), opposite to HPB, PSM and UGI groups (>70%, p 0.044). Overall, responders declared that the use of screening tools is largely neglected, that nutritional status is often assessed by the surgeons and that nutrition is not consistently modified according to risk factors (range among groups respectively: 1.9%-25.6%, 33.1%-51.4%, 33.1%-60.5%). Less than 20% of breast surgeons assess patients before/after surgery, comparing to >60% of PSM surgeons. However, no statistical differences were documented comparing groups for the majority of the items of the 4 domains. Nutritional evaluation is more often conducted by breast surgeons in medium/low HDI countries comparing very high/high HDI (p 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional assessment is largely neglected. These results identify target-issues for the implementation of clinical practice.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Sistema Digestório/cirurgia , Desnutrição/diagnóstico , Avaliação Nutricional , Padrões de Prática Médica , Sarcoma/cirurgia , Cirurgiões , Oncologia Cirúrgica , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Cirurgia Colorretal , Neoplasias do Sistema Digestório/complicações , Humanos , Desnutrição/complicações , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nutricionistas , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Sarcoma/complicações , Albumina Sérica , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Redução de Peso
2.
Breastfeed Med ; 11: 555-556, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27726424

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Management of breast abscess in lactating women remains controversial. During pregnancy, women may develop different kinds of benign breast lesions that could require a surgical incision performed under general anesthesia with consequent breastfeeding interruption. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the management of large breast abscesses with ultrasound-assisted drainage aiming at breastfeeding preservation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 34 lactating women with a diagnosis of unilateral breast abscess have been treated with an ultrasound (US)-assisted drainage of the abscess. A pigtail catheter was inserted into the fluid collection using the Seldinger technique under US guide and connected to a three stop way to allow drainage and irrigation of the cavity until its resolution. RESULTS: All procedures have been found safe and well tolerated. No recurrence was observed and breastfeeding was never interrupted. CONCLUSIONS: The described technique allows to avoid surgery and to preserve breastfeeding in well-selected patients with a safe, well-tolerated and cost-effective procedure.


Assuntos
Abscesso/terapia , Doenças Mamárias/terapia , Aleitamento Materno/efeitos adversos , Drenagem/instrumentação , Mastite/terapia , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Abscesso/diagnóstico por imagem , Abscesso/microbiologia , Adulto , Doenças Mamárias/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Mamárias/microbiologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Itália , Lactação/fisiologia , Mastite/diagnóstico por imagem , Mastite/microbiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 50(4): 947-55, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26836016

RESUMO

A growing concern in patients affected by Alzheimer's disease (AD) is dysphagia, or swallowing impairment, which leads to malnutrition, dehydration, weight loss, functional decline and fear of eating and drinking, as well as a decrease in the quality of life. Thus the diagnostic assessment of dysphagia in patients with AD is imperative to ensure that they receive effective management, avoiding complications, and reducing comorbidity and mortality in such a growing population. Dysphagia management requires a multidisciplinary approach considering that no single strategy is appropriate for all patients. However, evidence for clinical diagnostic assessment, interventions, and medical management of dysphagia in these patients are still limited: few studies are reporting the evaluation and the management among this group of patients. Here we analyzed the most recent findings in diagnostic assessment and management of swallowing impairment in patients affected by AD.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Doença de Alzheimer/terapia , Transtornos de Deglutição/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Deglutição/terapia , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA