Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ; 38(5): 933-942, 2023 Oct 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37847835

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To examine the remodeling process of both the soft and hard tissue components of the postextraction socket around immediately loaded dental implants after tooth extraction in maxillary esthetic areas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects underwent immediate placement of single implants in postextraction sockets without bone grafting, and their immediate provisionalization with custom tooth-like interim crowns were fabricated using digital diagnostic impressions and a dental milling machine. Intraoperative and 1-year follow-up layered scans of the postextraction sockets after implantation were acquired using a 3D optical system. In the short term, subjects underwent computed tomographic scans. Digital impressions for gingival contours, originally stored as STL (standard tessellation language) files, were converted to DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) files with the implant shoulder working as a referral point, which were then superimposed to 3D radiologic images. The observed volumetric and linear outcomes were measured using a program known as DentaScan. The width of the alveolar crest at the level of the implant shoulder and marginal bone levels were acquired. Nonparametric tests were applied with a level of significance set at P < .01. RESULTS: No failure was reported after a follow-up of 1 year. Little or no inflammation of the treated areas was registered, and there were practically no signs of suppuration. The areas showed a significant reduction in the overall volumes for both soft and bone tissue, with a P value < .0001 from the baseline (0.983 ± 0.172 cm3) to the 1-year survey (0.865 ± 0.156 cm3). If the soft and bone tissue changes were separately evaluated, a significant loss (with a P value < .0001) was registered for only the bone tissues (from 0.434 ± 0.075 to 0.355 ± 0.061 cm3). Moreover, changes in gingival tissue from baseline to the 1-year survey (-0.040 ± 0.067) appeared to be significantly different from the overall volume loss (-0.118 ± 0.083 cm3). A shrinkage in width (-0.5 ± 0.7 mm) was found from baseline (12.6 ± 0.6 mm) to the 1-year follow-up (12.1 ± 0.9 mm). Marginal bone levels were 0.97 ± 0.70 mm and 0.39 ± 0.78 mm, respectively, at the mesial and distal aspects of the implants. CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis suggested that immediately customized provisionalization was effective enough to prevent both volume loss and linear shrinkage at the layers of the treated areas. Moreover, the buccal aspects seemed to be the areas most affected by the loss of volume. The mean loss in width, which amounted to roughly 0.5 mm, appeared to be negligible when compared to the overall width measured before surgery.


Assuntos
Perda do Osso Alveolar , Implantes Dentários para Um Único Dente , Implantes Dentários , Carga Imediata em Implante Dentário , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Carga Imediata em Implante Dentário/métodos , Alvéolo Dental/cirurgia , Perda do Osso Alveolar/cirurgia , Seguimentos , Coroas , Estética Dentária , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Lasers , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Minerva Stomatol ; 67(5): 183-188, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30182639

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Periodontal diseases are characteristic for the excessive release of oxidant free-radicals by the host. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of an anti-oxidant-based formula containing propolis and herbs as an adjunctive therapy to standard non-surgical periodontal treatment (NSPT) when compared to the domiciliary use of chlorhexidine-based formulae. METHODS: Forty patients were enrolled in the present study and randomly allocated to either a control (NSPT plus chlorhexidine gel formula) group or a test (NSPT plus anti-oxidant gel formula) group. Clinical parameters for the assessment of the periodontal status were evaluated at baseline, one month, and three months after NSPT, and the salivary antioxidant capacity as well. RESULTS: There were no significant clinical differences between the two groups (P>0.05). However, patients within the test group (propolis) achieved better results in terms of oxidative stress reduction (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, propolis was comparable to chlorhexidine in the clinical management of gingivitis. Further studies are needed to investigate its potential as a redox modulator for the oral microbiome.


Assuntos
Gengivite/terapia , Própole/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antioxidantes/uso terapêutico , Biofilmes , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada , Placa Dentária/complicações , Raspagem Dentária , Feminino , Géis , Gengivite/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oxirredução , Estresse Oxidativo , Aplainamento Radicular , Saliva/química , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA