Financial Analysis of an Intensive Pediatric Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Program.

Study Objectives: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is effective in treating obstructive sleep apnea in children, but adherence to therapy is low. Our center created an intensive program that aimed to improve adherence. Our objective was to estimate the program's efficacy, cost, revenue and break-even point in a generalizable manner relative to a standard approach. Methods: The intensive program included device consignment, behavioral psychology counseling, and follow-up telephone calls. Economic modeling considered the costs, revenue and break-even point. Costs were derived from national salary reports and the Pediatric Health Information System. The 2015 Medicare reimbursement schedule provided revenue estimates. Results: Prior to the intensive CPAP program, only 67.6% of 244 patients initially prescribed CPAP appeared for follow-up visits and only 38.1% had titration polysomnograms. In contrast, 81.4% of 275 patients in the intensive program appeared for follow-up visits (p < .001) and 83.6% had titration polysomnograms (p < .001). Medicare reimbursement levels would be insufficient to cover the estimated costs of the intensive program; break-even points would need to be 1.29-2.08 times higher to cover the costs. Conclusions: An intensive CPAP program leads to substantially higher follow-up and CPAP titration rates, but costs are higher. While affordable at our institution due to the local payer mix and revenue, Medicare reimbursement levels would not cover estimated costs. This study highlights the need for enhanced funding for pediatric CPAP programs, due to the special needs of this population and the long-term health risks of suboptimally treated obstructive sleep apnea.

Associations among Neighborhood, Race, and Sleep Apnea Severity in Children. A Six-City Analysis.

RATIONALE: Prior researchers found that individual-level environmental and social indicators did not explain the racial disparity in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Neighborhood socioeconomic variables, as well as risk factors for a range of adverse behavioral and health outcomes, may better explain this racial disparity and help identify modifiable intervention targets. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the associations of neighborhood socioeconomic variables with obstructive sleep apnea severity and to assess whether the neighborhood variables explain the association between race and obstructive sleep apnea severity. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of data of 774 children in six cities who participated in the Childhood Adenotonsillectomy Trial. The outcome variable was the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Neighborhood socioeconomic variables were obtained on the basis of the children's residential addresses and information in the American Community Survey. Regression models were used to assess the associations among neighborhood conditions, race, and AHI. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Higher poverty rate and percentage of single-female-headed households were associated with higher AHI (P = 0.008 and 0.002, respectively). African American race was associated with a 1.33 (1.08-1.64 95% confidence interval)-fold increase in AHI, adjusting for age and sex. After controlling for poverty rate or percentage of single-female-headed households with children, the association between race and AHI levels was no longer significant (P = 0.15 and 0.26, respectively), and the magnitude of race association decreased 34 or 55%, suggesting that the association between race and AHI levels was largely explained by poverty rate or percentage of single-female-headed households with children. CONCLUSIONS: Neighborhood socioeconomic variables in comparison with individual-level socioeconomic indicators provides better explanations for the racial disparity in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Further research aimed at identifying factors that aggregate in disadvantaged neighborhoods and increase sleep apnea risk may suggest modifiable intervention targets. Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00560859).

Improving pediatric compliance with positive airway pressure therapy: the impact of behavioral intervention.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were (1) to describe behavior interventions provided to improve compliance with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapies in children with obstructive sleep apnea, (2) to survey physician and caregiver satisfaction with these interventions, and (3) to present preliminary outcome data on the effects of these interventions. DESIGN: Retrospective, descriptive analysis. SETTING: Pediatric psychology consultation service at a university-affiliated rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 20 children (aged 1-17 years) with obstructive sleep apnea, referred by physicians for noncompliance with PAP. INTERVENTIONS: Patients self-selected into 1 of 3 groups: (1) a group receiving a 1.5-hour consultation and recommendation session (CR+), (2) a group receiving consultation and recommendations plus a course of behavior therapy (BT), and (3) a group for whom behavior therapy was recommended after the consultation and recommendations, but the family did not follow-up (CR-). RESULTS: Prior to behavior intervention, none of the children were consistently wearing the PAP equipment. After intervention, 75% of children who received behavior intervention (CR+ and BT groups) successfully tolerated PAP with increased hours of documented usage. This was in contrast to children whose families declined recommended behavior therapy (CR- group), of whom 0% increased their usage of PAP. High satisfaction ratings were obtained from referring physicians and patient caregivers for children in the CR+ and BT groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results are encouraging and support the importance of behavior analysis and therapy for increasing compliance and making the benefits of PAP available to a greater number of children.