Cost and outcome of osteocutaneous free-tissue transfer versus pedicled soft-tissue reconstruction for composite mandibular defects.

Thirty-nine patients underwent reconstruction of composite mandibular defects following resection for squamous cell carcinoma. Thirty-four underwent immediate reconstruction, while 5 were reconstructed secondarily. Twenty-one received soft-tissue reconstruction only with a pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, 14 underwent osteocutaneous free-tissue transfer, and 4 received a reconstruction plate with free-tissue transfer for soft-tissue coverage. The mandibular defects in the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap group tended to be posterolateral, while free-tissue transfer defects were more severe, usually involving the anterior mandible. Length of surgery and duration of intensive care unit care were significantly longer for free-tissue transfer patients, while flap complications were more common in the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap patients. Facial appearance scores were higher for the free-tissue transfer group by both patient and physician assessment. Social function, speech, and oral function did not differ significantly. Patients reconstructed secondarily with free-tissue transfer reported significant improvement in appearance, oral continence, and social function, with little change in speech intelligibility, deglutition, or diet tolerance. The cost of the main hospitalization was significantly higher in the free-tissue transfer group than in the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap group, although when the costs of subsequent hospitalizations are included, the difference in total cost narrows. Despite more adverse defects, free-tissue transfer provided more predictable aesthetic results and expeditious return to normal social function than did pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction. The fiscal impact of these complex reconstructions is, however, significant. Cost-containment issues are presented and recommendations are made.

Preoperative assessment and surgical planning for patients undergoing immediate composite reconstruction of oromandibular defects.

The rehabilitation of patients with orofacial-mandibular defects has made great strides with our ability to reliably transfer composite tissues. Unimpeded soft-tissue healing and osseous union set the stage for reliable restoration of form and function. A multidisciplinary, carefully planned, and carefully executed approach is emphasized.

Computed tomography versus standard radiography in the assessment of fractures of the mandible.

Twenty-nine fractures of the mandible were studied by standard radiographs and axial computed tomographic scans (hard copy). Independent reviewers analyzed each study in a blinded, non-paired fashion. When radiographic diagnostic sensitivities were compared on the basis of known surgical findings, the plain films were found to have a higher diagnostic sensitivity (89%) than the hard copy computed tomograms (64%). This difference occurred primarily with images of nondisplaced fractures in posterior portions of the mandible, and is likely the result of tomographic orientation and volume averaging. Though computed tomography has emerged as the standard diagnostic test in evaluating intracranial and maxillofacial trauma, this study demonstrates that computed tomographic scanning alone is inadequate in excluding nondisplaced fractures of the posterior mandible.