Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Womens Health (Lond) ; 19: 17455057231170061, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37184054

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cancer is the leading cause of death in people living with HIV. In the United States, nearly 1 in 4 people living with HIV are women, more than half of whom rely on Medicaid for healthcare coverage. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the cancer burden of women living with HIV on Medicaid. DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional study of women 18-64 years of age enrolled in Medicaid during 2012, using data from Medicaid Analytic eXtract files. METHODS: Using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes, we identified women living with HIV (n = 72,508) and women without HIV (n = 17,353,963), flagging the presence of 15 types of cancer and differentiating between AIDS-defining cancers and non-AIDS-defining cancers. We obtained adjusted prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals for each cancer and for all cancers combined, using multivariable log-binomial models, and additionally stratifying by age and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: The highest adjusted prevalence ratios were observed for Kaposi's sarcoma (81.79 (95% confidence interval: 57.11-117.22)) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (27.69 (21.67-35.39)). The adjusted prevalence ratios for anal and cervical cancer, both of which were human papillomavirus-associated cancers, were 19.31 (17.33-21.51) and 4.20 (3.90-4.52), respectively. Among women living with HIV, the adjusted prevalence ratio for all cancer types combined was about two-fold higher (1.99 (1.86-2.14)) in women 45-64 years of age than in women 18-44 years of age. For non-AIDS-defining cancers but not for AIDS-defining cancers, the adjusted prevalence ratios were higher in older than in younger women. There was no significant difference in the adjusted prevalence ratios for all cancer types combined in the race/ethnicity-stratified analyses of the women living with HIV cohort. However, in cancer type-specific sub-analyses, differences in adjusted prevalence ratios between Hispanic versus non-Hispanic women were observed. For example, the adjusted prevalence ratio for Hispanic women for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma was 2.00 (1.30-3.07) and 0.73 (0.58-0.92), respectively, for breast cancer. CONCLUSION: Compared to their counterparts without HIV, women living with HIV on Medicaid have excess prevalence of cervical and anal cancers, both of which are human papillomavirus related, as well as Kaposi's sarcoma and lymphoma. Older age is also associated with increased burden of non-AIDS-defining cancers in women living with HIV. Our findings emphasize the need for not only cancer screening among women living with HIV but also for efforts to increase human papillomavirus vaccination among all eligible individuals.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Infecções por HIV , Medicaid , Neoplasias , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Jovem , Estudos Transversais , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Linfoma não Hodgkin/complicações , Linfoma não Hodgkin/epidemiologia , Linfoma não Hodgkin/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Sarcoma de Kaposi/complicações , Sarcoma de Kaposi/epidemiologia , Sarcoma de Kaposi/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia
2.
Urol Pract ; 10(1): 59-65, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37103437

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Medicare eligibility at 65 has been associated with increased diagnosis and survival for certain cancers due to greater health care utilization. We aim to assess for a similar "Medicare effect" for bladder and kidney cancers, which has not been previously established. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with bladder or kidney cancer from 2000-2018 at ages 60-69 years were identified with the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. We used age-over-age percent change calculations to characterize trends in cancer diagnoses focusing on patients aged 65. Multivariable Cox models were used to compare cancer-specific mortality across ages at diagnosis. RESULTS: We identified 63,960 patients diagnosed with bladder cancer and 52,316 diagnosed with kidney cancer. Age-over-age change in diagnosis was highest for patients aged 65 compared to all other ages for both cancers (P < .01 for both). Stratified by stage, patients aged 65 had a higher age-over-age change than those aged 61-64 or 66-69 for in situ (P = .01, P < .01, respectively), localized (P = .03, P = .01), and regional (P = .02, P = .02) bladder cancer and localized (P = .01, P = .01) kidney cancer. Bladder cancer patients aged 65 had lower cancer-specific mortality than patients aged 66 (HR = 1.17, P = .01) and 69 (HR = 1.18, P = .01), while kidney cancer patients aged 65 had lower mortality than patients aged 64 (HR = 1.18, P < .01) and 66-69. CONCLUSIONS: The age of 65, marking the onset of Medicare eligibility, is associated with more diagnoses of bladder and kidney cancer. Patients diagnosed at age 65 demonstrate decreased bladder and kidney cancer-specific mortality.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Medicare , Bexiga Urinária , Programa de SEER , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/complicações , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico
3.
Cancer ; 128(10): 1987-1995, 2022 05 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35285515

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cancer is one of the most common comorbidities in men living with HIV (MLWH). However, little is known about the MLWH subgroups with the highest cancer burden to which cancer prevention efforts should be targeted. Because Medicaid is the most important source of insurance for MLWH, we evaluated the excess cancer prevalence in MLWH on Medicaid relative to their non-HIV counterparts. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study using 2012 Medicaid Analytic eXtract data nationwide, we flagged the presence of HIV, 13 types of cancer, symptomatic HIV, and viral coinfections using codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification. The study population included individuals administratively noted to be of male sex (men), aged 18 to 64 years, with (n = 82,495) or without (n = 7,302,523) HIV. We developed log-binomial models with cancer as the outcome stratified by symptomatic status, age, and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Cancer prevalence was higher in MLWH than in men without HIV (adjusted prevalence ratio [APR], 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.78-1.90) and was higher among those with symptomatic HIV (APR, 2.74; 95% CI, 2.52-2.97) than among those with asymptomatic HIV (APR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.67-1.79). The highest APRs were observed for anal cancer in younger men, both in the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups: APR, 312.97; 95% CI, 210.27-465.84, and APR, 482.26; 95% CI, 390.67-595.32, respectively. In race/ethnicity strata, the highest APRs were among Hispanic men for anal cancer (APR, 198.53; 95% CI, 144.54-272.68) and for lymphoma (APR, 9.10; 95% CI, 7.80-10.63). CONCLUSIONS: Given the Medicaid program's role in insuring MLWH, the current findings highlight the importance of the program's efforts to promote healthy behaviors and vaccination against human papillomavirus in all children and adolescents and to provide individualized cancer screening for MLWH.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Ânus , Infecções por HIV , Adolescente , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid , Prevalência , Comportamento Sexual , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(1): e2144027, 2022 01 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35040965

RESUMO

Importance: Prostate cancer (PCa) disproportionately affects African American men, but research evaluating the extent of racial and ethnic disparities across the PCa continuum in equal-access settings remains limited at the national level. The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Veterans Hospital Administration health care system offers a setting of relatively equal access to care in which to assess racial and ethnic disparities in self-identified African American (or Black) veterans and White veterans. Objective: To determine the extent of racial and ethnic disparities in the incidence of PCa, clinical stage, and outcomes between African American patients and White patients who received a diagnosis or were treated at a VA hospital. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included 7 889 984 veterans undergoing routine care in VA hospitals nationwide from 2005 through 2019 (incidence cohort). The age-adjusted incidence of localized and de novo metastatic PCa was estimated. Treatment response was evaluated, and PCa-specific outcomes were compared between African American veterans and White veterans. Residual disparity in PCa outcome, defined as the leftover racial and ethnic disparity in the outcomes despite equal response to treatment, was estimated. Exposures: Self-identified African American (or Black) and White race and ethnicity. Main Outcomes and Measures: Time to distant metastasis following PCa diagnosis was the primary outcome. Descriptive analyses were used to compare baseline demographics and clinic characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate race and ethnicity association with pretreatment clinical variables. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate the risk of metastasis. Results: Data from 7 889 984 veterans from the incidence cohort were used to estimate incidence, whereas data from 92 269 veterans with localized PCa were used to assess treatment response. Among 92 269 veterans, African American men (n = 28 802 [31%]) were younger (median [IQR], 63 [58-68] vs 65 [62-71] years) and had higher prostate-specific antigen levels (>20 ng/mL) at the time of diagnosis compared with White men (n = 63 467; [69%]). Consistent with US population-level data, African American veterans displayed a nearly 2-fold greater incidence of localized and de novo metastatic PCa compared with White men across VA centers nationwide. Among veterans screened for PCa, African American men had a 29% increased risk of PCa detection on a diagnostic prostate biopsy compared with White (hazard ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.27-1.31; P < .001). African American men who received definitive primary treatment of PCa experienced a lower risk of metastasis (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.95; P < .001). However, African American men who received nondefinitive treatment classified as "other" were more likely to develop metastasis (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.17-1.42; P < .001). Using the actual rate of metastasis from veterans who received definitive primary treatment, a persistent residual metastatic burden for African American men was observed across all National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk groups (low risk, 4 vs 2 per 100 000; intermediate risk, 13 vs 6 per 100 000; high risk, 19 vs 9 per 100 000). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort analysis found significant disparities in the incidence of localized and metastatic PCa between African American veterans and White veterans. This increased incidence is a major factor associated with the residual disparity in PCa metastasis observed in African American veterans compared with White veterans despite their nearly equal response to treatment.


Assuntos
Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Neoplasias da Próstata/etnologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Humanos , Incidência , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
5.
HPB (Oxford) ; 24(6): 925-932, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34872866

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality. Operative management of early disease includes ablation, resection, and transplantation. We compared the operative management of early-stage HCC in patients stratified by race. METHODS: We identified patients with cT1 HCC and Charlson-Deyo score 0-1 in the National Cancer Database (2004-2016). We compared operative/non-operative management by race, adjusting for clinicodemographic variables. We performed marginal standardization of logistic regression to ascertain adjusted probabilities of resection or transplantation in patients under 70 years of age with insurance. RESULTS: A total of 25,029 patients were included (White = 20,410; Black = 4619). After adjusting for clinico demographic variables, Black race was associated with a lower likelihood of undergoing operative intervention (OR 0.89,p = 0.009). Black patients were more likely to undergo resection (OR 1.23,p < 0.001) and less likely to undergo transplantation (OR 0.60,p < 0.001). Marginal standardization models demonstrated Black race was associated with increased probability of resection in patients >50yrs, with private insurance/Medicare, and lower probability of transplantation regardless of age or insurance payor. CONCLUSION: Black race is associated with lower rates of hepatic transplantation and higher rates of hepatic resection for early HCC regardless of age or insurance payor. The etiology of these disparities is multifactorial and correcting the root causes represents a critical area for improvement.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Transplante de Fígado , Idoso , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Medicare , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
6.
Prostate ; 81(8): 487-496, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33860950

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Melatonin levels are partially driven by the parenchyma volume of the pineal gland. Low urinary levels of 6-sulfatoxymelatonin have been associated with increased risk of advanced prostate cancer, but the relationship between pineal gland volume and composition and prostate cancer risk has not been examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We utilized data from 864 men from the AGES-Reykjavik Study with complete pineal gland volumes and urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin measurements. Pineal parenchyma, calcification, and cyst volumes were calculated from brain magnetic resonance imaging. Levels of 6-sulfatoxymelatonin were assayed from prediagnostic urine samples. We calculated Pearson correlation coefficients between parenchyma volume and urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin levels. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to calculate multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) comparing prostate cancer risk across parenchyma volume tertiles and across categories factoring in parenchyma volume, gland composition, and urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin level. RESULTS: Parenchyma volume was moderately correlated with urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin level (r = .24; p < .01). There was no statistically significant association between parenchyma volume tertile and prostate cancer risk. Men with high parenchyma volume, pineal cysts and calcifications, and low urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin levels had almost twice the risk of total prostate cancer as men with low parenchyma volume, no pineal calcifications or cysts, and low urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin levels (HR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.02, 3.84; p: .04). CONCLUSIONS: Although parenchyma volume is not associated with prostate cancer risk, pineal gland composition and other circadian dynamics may influence risk for prostate cancer. Additional studies are needed to examine the interplay of pineal gland volume, composition, and melatonin levels on prostate cancer risk.


Assuntos
Melatonina/análogos & derivados , Glândula Pineal/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Islândia/epidemiologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Melatonina/urina , Tamanho do Órgão/fisiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/urina , Sistema de Registros , Risco
7.
PLoS One ; 13(2): e0193047, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29447263

RESUMO

Cervical cancer outcomes remain poor among disadvantaged populations, including ethnic minorities, low-income, and underinsured women. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanisms that underlie the observed association between race/ethnicity and cervical cancer survival. We identified 13,698 women, ages 21 to 64 years, diagnosed with stages I-III primary cervical cancer between 2007-2013 in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models evaluated associations between race/ethnicity (Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, Other) and cervical cancer-specific mortality. We conducted mediation analysis to calculate the mediation proportion and its 95% confidence interval. Non-Hispanic black women had an increased risk of cervical cancer-specific mortality (HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.08-1.39), and Hispanic women a decreased risk of dying from their disease (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.72-0.93), compared with non-Hispanic white. The estimated proportion of excess cervical cancer mortality for non-Hispanic black women relative to non-Hispanic white women that was mediated by insurance was 18.6% and by treatment was 47.2%. Furthermore, non-Hispanic black women were more likely to receive radiation and less likely to receive surgery for early-stage disease. In this population-based study we found that some of the excess cervical cancer-specific mortality for non-Hispanic black women is mediated by factors such as insurance status and treatment. These findings suggest that enhancing existing insurance coverage and ensuring equal and adequate treatment in all women may be a key strategy for improving cervical cancer outcomes.


Assuntos
Etnicidade , Cobertura do Seguro , Grupos Raciais , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/economia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Programa de SEER , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade , População Branca , Adulto Jovem
8.
Cancer ; 122(20): 3127-3135, 2016 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27500561

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: People aged 26 to 34 years represent the greatest proportion of the uninsured, and they have the highest incidence of testicular cancers. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between insurance status and cancer outcomes in men diagnosed with germ cell tumors. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify 10,211 men diagnosed with germ cell gonadal neoplasms from 2007 to 2011. Associations between insurance status and characteristics at diagnosis and receipt of treatment were examined with log-binomial regression. The association between insurance status and mortality was assessed with Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Uninsured patients had an increased risk of metastatic disease at diagnosis (relative risk [RR], 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.38) in comparison with insured patients, as did Medicaid patients (RR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.51-1.74). Among men with metastatic disease, uninsured and Medicaid patients were more likely to be diagnosed with intermediate/poor-risk disease (RR for uninsured patients, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.04-1.44; RR for Medicaid patients, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.23-1.57) and were less likely to undergo lymph node dissection (RR for uninsured patients, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.57-0.94; RR for Medicaid patients, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63-0.92) in comparison with insured patients. Men without insurance were more likely to die of their disease (hazard ratio [HR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.29-2.75) in comparison with insured men, as were those with Medicaid (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.08-2.10). CONCLUSIONS: Patients without insurance and patients with Medicaid have an increased risk of presenting with advanced disease and dying of the disease in comparison with those who have insurance. Future studies should examine whether implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act reduces these disparities. Cancer 2016;122:3127-35. © 2016 American Cancer Society.


Assuntos
Cobertura do Seguro , Medicaid , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/patologia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Seguro Saúde , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/terapia , Prognóstico , Programa de SEER , Taxa de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA