Assessment of thyroiditis risk associated with HPV vaccination among girls aged 9-18 years: A time-varying cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested a relationship between human papillomavirus vaccine and autoimmune diseases, including thyroiditis. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the risk of thyroiditis associated with HPV vaccination among girls using the Primary Care Database For Pharmacoepidemiological Research (BIFAP) in Spain. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, girls in BIFAP aged 9-18 years from 2007 to 2016, free of past thyroiditis and HPV vaccination, were included. Hazard Ratios (HRs; 95% CI) of thyroiditis were calculated within exposed periods (up to 2 years of vaccination) and post-exposed periods (from 2 years after vaccination onwards) compared with non-exposed periods, overall, by dose and by type of vaccine, adjusted for potential confounders collected at different times. In a post-hoc analysis, we moved back the thyroiditis date (30 days) as a theoretical delay in diagnosis. RESULTS: Out of the 388,411 girls included in the cohort, 153,924 were vaccinated against HPV and 480 thyroiditis (253 autoimmune) cases were identified (334 non-exposed; 103 exposed; 43 post-exposed). Adjusted HR was 1.18 [95% CI: 0.79-1.76] for exposed (1.25 [0.77-2.04] for bi- and 1.15 [0.76-1.76] for quadri-valent vaccines) and 1.26 [0.74-2.14] for post-exposed periods. HR was 1.50 [0.87-2.59] for the 1st dose, 1.13 [0.66-1.91] for the 2nd and 1.11 [0.71-1.72] for the 3rd one. When the diagnosis date was moved back, the risk was 1.14 [0.76-1.70] for exposed period, being 1.80 [0.86-3.76] and 1.40 [0.74-2.66] after 1st dose of bi- and quadri-valent, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe an increased risk of thyroiditis following HPV vaccination (whether bi- or quadri-valent). Even though the point estimate was higher after 1st HPV vaccination dose than after subsequent doses, a dose-effect was not confirmed. Results remained similar after applying a lag time.

Predictors of Over-Anticoagulation in Warfarin Users in the UK General Population: A Nested Case-Control Study in a Primary Health Care Database.

BACKGROUND: Many patients on warfarin therapy often present with supratherapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) levels, resulting from the influence of several patient-specific factors, which have been associated with adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This article aims to identify risk factors for over-anticoagulation (INR levels ≥4) in a cohort of patients taking warfarin. METHODS: A cohort of warfarin users aged 18 to 85 years from January 2005 to April 2013 was identified in The Health Improvement Network U.K. primary care database (N = 12,506). A random date was assigned to all patients within their eligible person-time (index date), and a nested case-control analysis was performed with individuals presenting a first episode of INR level ≥4 after the index date used as cases (N = 699) and patients with non-supratherapeutic INR values (≤3) as controls (N = 9,798). Using unconditional logistic regression models, odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated adjusted for potential confounders. Two sensitivity analyses were performed with alternative definitions of over-anticoagulation (INR levels ≥5 or > 3). RESULTS: Among the factors examined, the strongest predictors of over-anticoagulation were warfarin indication (in particular, valvular atrial fibrillation and valve replacement), renal failure (with the risk increasing steeply with decreasing estimated glomerular filtration rate), cancer, anaemia, respiratory infections treated with antibiotics, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated with ß2-agonists, polypharmacy (≥10 medications), low socio-economic status and residency in rural areas. Similar results were obtained when supratherapeutic levels were defined as INR ≥5 or, alternatively, as INR > 3. CONCLUSION: Predictors of supratherapeutic INR levels found in this study might help physicians identify patients where closer INR monitoring is warranted.

Incidence and risk factors for atrial fibrillation in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure.

AIMS: We aimed to identify the incidence and risk factors for first ever atrial fibrillation among patients with newly diagnosed heart failure following initial heart failure diagnosis. METHODS: A heart failure inception cohort of patients aged 20-89 years without atrial fibrillation or cancer (N = 14 457) from 2000 to 2005 was identified from The Health Improvement Network primary care database in the United Kingdom and followed for a mean of 2.67 years. First ever cases of atrial fibrillation were identified and controls (N = 3000) were frequency matched to cases by age and sex. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred and eighty-nine patients (10.3%) developed a first episode of atrial fibrillation: incidence rate 27.3/1000 person-years. A three-fold increased risk of atrial fibrillation was seen in the first 6 months after heart failure diagnosis, OR 3.62 (95% CI: 2.97-4.42) with the risk decreasing thereafter. Other risk factors were excessive alcohol consumption (OR 2.91, 1.60-5.30) and valvular heart disease (OR 1.98, 1.63-2.40) and use of oral steroids (OR 1.76, 95% CI: 1.40-2.22). Reduced risks of atrial fibrillation were found with use of statins (OR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.56-0.76) and ß-blockers (OR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.67-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of first ever atrial fibrillation among newly diagnosed heart failure patients is high, especially in the first 6 months after diagnosis. This time relationship, together with the identified risk factors for atrial fibrillation, warrants consideration in the medical care of patients with heart failure.

Impact of hyperkalaemia definition on incidence assessment: implications for epidemiological research based on a large cohort study in newly diagnosed heart failure patients in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Various definitions of hyperkalaemia have been used in clinical research, and data from routine clinical practice on its incidence are sparse. We aimed to establish the incidence of hyperkalaemia in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure in the UK general population using different definitions for the condition. METHODS: We conducted a large retrospective cohort study using data from The Health Improvement Network primary care database. Patients with newly diagnosed heart failure (N = 19,194) were identified and followed until the first occurrence of hyperkalaemia. Different serum potassium (K(+)) thresholds were evaluated as possible definitions for hyperkalaemia, and incidence rates (IRs) calculated using a final operational definition both overall and among patient sub-groups. RESULTS: IRs of hyperkalaemia ranged from 0.92-7.93 per 100 person-years according to the definition. Based on considerable differences in the serum K(+) normal range used between practices, 2176 (11.3 %) individuals were identified with a record of hyperkalaemia using our operational definition of a proportional increase of ≥10 % above the upper bound of the normal range: IR 2.90 per 100 person-years (95 % CI 2.78-3.02) over a mean follow-up of 3.91 years. Incidence rates were higher in older patients, and in those with diabetes or renal impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperkalaemia is a common finding in heart failure patients in primary care, but its incidence can vary nearly ten-fold depending on its definition. Since assessment of hyperkalaemia risk is essential for therapeutic decision making in heart failure patients, this finding warrants consideration in future epidemiological studies.