Development of Quality Indicators to Assess Oral Anticoagulant Management in Community Pharmacies for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the quality of oral anticoagulant management by community pharmacists. There is no complete set of quality indicators available for this purpose. OBJECTIVE: To develop a set of specific quality indicators to assess oral anticoagulant management by community pharmacists for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Quality indicators were developed in 3 phases. In phase 1, potential quality indicators were generated based on clinical guidelines and a literature review. In phase 2, a modified RAND appropriateness method involving 2 rounds was implemented with 9 experts, who judged the appropriateness of quality indicators generated in phase 1 based on the extent to which they were accurate, based on evidence, relevant, representative of best practices, and measurable in community pharmacies. Phase 3 consisted of a feasibility assessment in 5 community pharmacies on 2 patients each. RESULTS: The final set included 38 quality indicators grouped into 6 categories: documentation (n = 29), risk assessment (n = 3), clinical control (n = 1), clinical follow-up (n = 15), choice of therapy (n = 11), and interaction management (n = 8). The quality indicators referred to process of care (n = 34), clinical outcomes (n = 2), or structure of care (n = 2). There were 24 quality indicators related to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), and 17 were related to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). To assess quality indicators, a questionnaire was developed for completion by community pharmacists for each patient, which included 17 questions about VKA patients and 12 questions about DOAC patients. CONCLUSIONS: A first set of quality indicators is now available to assess the quality of oral anticoagulant management by community pharmacists for patients with AF. DISCLOSURES: This research was supported by the Réseau Québécois de recherche sur le médicament (RQRM); the Blueprint for Pharmacy in collaboration with Pfizer Canada; and the Cercle du Doyen of the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal. The study sponsors were not involved in the study design, data collection, data interpretation, the writing of the article, or the decision to submit the report for publication. Chartrand received a scholarship from the Fonds de Recherche du Québec en Santé (FRQ-S), the Réseau Québécois de recherche sur l'usage des médicaments with Pfizer, and the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal. Guénette holds a Junior-1 Clinician Researcher Award from the FRQ-S in partnership with the Société québécoise d'hypertension artérielle. Williamson holds a Junior-1 Career Award from the FRQ-S. Côté reported being a medical speaker for Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim Canada, and Pfizer Canada. The other authors reported no conflicts of interest. Study concept and design were contributed by Lalonde, Chartrand, and Martin. Chartrand, Martin, and Lalonde collected the data, along with Brouillette, Côté, Huot, Landry, Martineau, Perreault, Williamson, and White-Guay. Data interpretation was performed by Chartrand, Gagnon, and Lalonde, along with Guénette and Martin. The manuscript was primarily written by Chartrand, along with Guénette and Lalonde, and revised by Chartrand, Guénette, and Lalonde, along with the other authors. A portion of this study's results was presented at the 4th RQRM Annual Meeting on September 22-23, 2014, in Orford, Quebec, Canada, in the form of an abstract, which was published in the Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology, 2014;21(2):e312.

Is long-term pharmacist-managed anticoagulation service efficient? A pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Some pharmacist-managed anticoagulation services (PMAS) provide initial follow-up to patients on oral anticoagulant, who are transferred to their physician once they are stabilized. This may be as effective as and less expensive than long-term PMAS follow-up. METHODS: Once PMAS patients were stabilized and ready for discharge, they were randomized to be transferred to their physician or stay with the PMAS. Quality of international normalized ratio (INR) control, incidence of complications, health-related quality of life, use of health care services, and direct incremental cost of PMAS follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight physicians and 250 patients participated. Patients were initially followed at the PMAS for a mean of 11.3 weeks and afterwards were followed by their physician (n = 122) or by the PMAS pharmacists (n = 128) for a mean of 14.9 and 14.5 weeks, respectively. Pharmacist-managed anticoagulation services' and physician's patients were within the exact target range 77.3% and 76.7% of the time (95% CI of the difference -4.9% to 6.0%) and within the extended range 93.0% and 91.6% of the time (95% CI -2.1% to 4.7%), respectively. Pharmacist-managed anticoagulation services patients have seen their family physician less often (95% CI -3.1 to -0.1 visit per year). Number of INR tests, incidence of complications, and health-related quality of life were similar in both groups. The incremental cost of PMAS follow-up was estimated at CAN$123.80 per patient year. CONCLUSION: Once PMAS patients are well stabilized, maintaining a PMAS follow-up or transferring them to their physician is associated with excellent INR control. However, long-term PMAS follow-up may be more expensive.

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin for the prevention of thromboembolic events in orthopedic surgery patients.

INTRODUCTION: Fondaparinux is a novel synthetic antithrombotic that has been evaluated for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In four large trials in patients who underwent major hip or knee surgery, fondaparinux was found to have a good safety profile and be more effective than enoxaparin. To generate Canadian pharmacoeconomic data for fondaparinux, an internationally developed cohort deterministic model was used to estimate the costs and consequences of prophylaxis with fondaparinux compared with enoxaparin in the Canadian orthopedic surgical setting. DESIGN AND SETTING: A health economic advisory group was assembled to guide the pharmacoeconomic evaluation. Efficacy and safety data for fondaparinux relative to enoxaparin were abstracted from a meta-analysis of four randomized trials. Canadian cost data to populate the model were obtained from a resource-use survey of four large Canadian hospitals, from the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), and from the Canadian economic literature. Case-mix information obtained from CIHI was incorporated into the cohort deterministic model, which predicted the number of VTEs and bleeds following prophylaxis with fondaparinux or enoxaparin within 90 days of surgery, and the associated overall cost difference. The stability of the base-case findings was evaluated with sensitivity analyses. STUDY PERSPECTIVE: Canadian healthcare system perspective. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: Assuming a case mix of 50,693 major hip or knee surgeries performed in Canada in 1999/2000 (as reported by CIHI), the model predicted that prophylaxis with fondaparinux would avoid an additional 16 symptomatic VTEs per 1000 patients over the first 90 days, with an average cost savings of Can 55 dollars per patient. These findings were stable when key economic and clinical parameters were varied, including bleeding events. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that in Canada, prophylactic fondaparinux compared with enoxaparin avoids VTEs and is associated with lower costs in patients who undergo major hip or knee surgery.