Impact of radiation dose on the detection of interstitial lung changes and image quality in low-dose chest CT - Assessment in multiple dose levels from a single patient scan.

PURPOSE: To assess image quality and detectability of interstitial lung changes using multiple radiation doses from the same chest CT scan of patients with suspected interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHOD: Retrospective study of consecutive adult patients with suspected ILD receiving unenhanced chest CT as single-energy dual-source acquisition at 100 kVp (Dual-split mode). 67% and 33% of the overall tube current time product were assigned to tube A and B, respectively. 100%-dose was 2.34 ± 0.97 mGy. Five different radiation doses (100%, 67%, 45%, 39%, 33%) were reconstructed from this single acquisition using linear-blending technique. Two blinded radiologists assessed reticulations, ground-glass opacities (GGO) and honeycombing as well as subjective image noise. Percentage agreement (PA) as compared to 100%-dose were calculated. Non-parametric statistical tests were used. RESULTS: A total of 228 patients were included (61.2 ± 14.6 years,146 female). PA was highest for honeycombing (>96%) and independent of dose reduction (P > 0.8). PA for reticulations and GGO decreased when reducing the radiation dose from 100% to 67% for both readers (reticulations: 83.3% and 93.9%; GGO: 87.7% and 79.8% for reader 1 and 2, respectively). Additional dose reduction did not significantly change PA for both readers (all P > 0.05). Subjective image noise increased with decreasing radiation dose (Spearman Rho of ρ = 0.34 and ρ = 0.53 for reader 1 and 2, respectively, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Radiation dose reduction had a stronger impact on subtle interstitial lung changes. Detectability decreased with initial dose reduction indicating that a minimum dose is needed to maintain diagnostic accuracy in chest CT for suspected ILD.

CT Angiography of the Aorta Using Photon-counting Detector CT with Reduced Contrast Media Volume.

Purpose: To develop and evaluate a low-volume contrast media protocol for thoracoabdominal CT angiography (CTA) with photon-counting detector (PCD) CT. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included consecutive participants (April-September 2021) who underwent CTA with PCD CT of the thoracoabdominal aorta and previous CTA with energy-integrating detector (EID) CT at equal radiation doses. In PCD CT, virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) were reconstructed in 5-keV intervals from 40 to 60 keV. Attenuation of the aorta, image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured, and subjective image quality was rated by two independent readers. In the first group of participants, the same contrast media protocol was used for both scans. CNR gain in PCD CT compared with EID CT served as the reference for contrast media volume reduction in the second group. Noninferiority analysis was used to test noninferior image quality of the low-volume contrast media protocol with PCD CT. Results: The study included 100 participants (mean age, 75 years ± 8 [SD]; 83 men). In the first group (n = 40), VMI at 50 keV provided the best trade-off between objective and subjective image quality, achieving 25% higher CNR compared with EID CT. Contrast media volume in the second group (n = 60) was reduced by 25% (52.5 mL). Mean differences in CNR and subjective image quality between EID CT and PCD CT at 50 keV were above the predefined boundaries of noninferiority (-0.54 [95% CI: -1.71, 0.62] and -0.36 [95% CI: -0.41, -0.31], respectively). Conclusion: CTA of the aorta with PCD CT was associated with higher CNR, which was translated into a low-volume contrast media protocol demonstrating noninferior image quality compared with EID CT at the same radiation dose.Keywords: CT Angiography, CT-Spectral, Vascular, Aorta, Contrast Agents-Intravenous, Technology Assessment© RSNA, 2023See also the commentary by Dundas and Leipsic in this issue.

Influence of CT Image Matrix Size and Kernel Type on the Assessment of HRCT in Patients with SSC-ILD.

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent complication of systemic sclerosis (SSc), and its early detection and treatment may prevent deterioration of lung function. Different vendors have recently made larger image matrices available as a post-processing option for computed tomography (CT), which could facilitate the diagnosis of SSc-ILD. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the effect of matrix size on lung image quality in patients with SSc by comparing a 1024-pixel matrix to a standard 512-pixel matrix and applying different reconstruction kernels. Methods: Lung scans of 50 patients (mean age 54 years, range 23−85 years) with SSc were reconstructed with these two different matrix sizes, after determining the most appropriate kernel in a first step. Four observers scored the images on a five-point Likert scale regarding image quality and detectability of clinically relevant findings. Results: Among the eight tested kernels, the Br59-kernel (sharp) reached the highest score (19.48 ± 3.99), although differences did not reach statistical significance. The 1024-pixel matrix scored higher than the 512-pixel matrix HRCT overall (p = 0.01) and in the subcategories sharpness (p < 0.01), depiction of bronchiole (p < 0.01) and overall image impression (p < 0.01), and lower for the detection of ground-glass opacities (GGO) (p = 0.04). No significant differences were found for detection of extent of reticulations/bronchiectasis/fibrosis (p = 0.50) and image noise (p = 0.09). Conclusions: Our results show that with the use of a sharp kernel, the 1024-pixel matrix HRCT, provides a slightly better subjective image quality in terms of assessing interstitial lung changes, whereby GGO are more visible on the 512-pixel matrix. However, it remains to be answered to what extent this is related to the improved representation of the smallest structures.

Potential of Photon-Counting Detector CT for Radiation Dose Reduction for the Assessment of Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the potential of photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) for radiation dose reduction compared with conventional energy-integrated detector CT (EID-CT) in the assessment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients. METHODS: In this retrospective study, SSc patients receiving a follow-up noncontrast chest examination on a PCD-CT were included between May 2021 and December 2021. Baseline scans were generated on a dual-source EID-CT by selecting the tube current-time product for each of the 2 x-ray tubes to obtain a 100% (D 100 ), a 66% (D 66 ), and a 33% dose image (D 33 ) from the same data set. Slice thickness and kernel were adjusted between the 2 scans. Image noise was assessed by placing a fixed region of interest in the subcutaneous fat. Two independent readers rated subjective image quality (5-point Likert scale), presence, extent, diagnostic confidence, and accuracy of SSc-ILD. D 100 interpreted by a radiologist with 22 years of experience served as reference standard. Interobserver agreement was calculated with Cohen κ, and mean variables were compared by a paired t test. RESULTS: Eighty patients (mean 56 ± 14; 64 women) were included. Although CTDI vol of PCD-CT was comparable to D 33 (0.72 vs 0.76 mGy, P = 0.091), mean image noise of PCD-CT was comparable to D 100 (131 ± 15 vs 113 ± 12, P > 0.05). Overall subjective image quality of PCD-CT was comparable to D 100 (4.72 vs 4.71; P = 0.874). Diagnostic accuracy was higher in PCD-CT compared with D 33 /D 66 (97.6% and 92.5%/96.3%, respectively) and comparable to D 100 (98.1%). CONCLUSIONS: With PCD-CT, a radiation dose reduction of 66% compared with EID-CT is feasible, without penalty in image quality and diagnostic performance for the evaluation of ILD.

Value of an online PI-RADS v2.1 score calculator for assessment of prostate MRI.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the value of a browser-based PI-RADS Score Calculator (PCalc) compared to MRI reporting using the official PI-RADS v2.1 document (PDoc) for non-specialized radiologists in terms of reporting efficiency, interrater agreement and diagnostic accuracy for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: Between 09/2013 and 04/2015, 100 patients (median age, 64.8; range 47.5-78.2) who underwent prostate-MRI at a 3 T scanner and who received transperineal prostate mapping biopsy within <6 months were included in this retrospective study. Two non-specialized radiology residents (R1, R2) attributed a PI-RADS version 2.1 score for the most suspect (i. e. index) lesion (i) using the original PI-RADS v2.1 document only and after a 6-week interval (ii) using a browser-based PCalc. Reading time was measured. Reading time differences were assessed using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Intraclass-correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to assess interrater agreement (IRA). Parameters of diagnostic accuracy and ROC curves were used for assessment of lesion-based diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Cumulative reading time was 32:55 (mm:ss) faster when using the PCalc, the difference being statistically significant for both readers (p < 0.05). The difference in IRA between the image sets (ICC 0.55 [0.40, 0.68]) and 0.75 [0.65, 0.82] for the image set with PDoc and PCalc, respectively) was not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in lesion-based diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.83 [0.74, 0.92] and 0.82 [95 %CI: 0.74, 0.91]) for images assessed with PDoc as compared to PCalc (AUC 0.82 [0.74, 0.91] and 0.74 [95 %CI: 0.64, 0.83]) for R1 and R2, respectively. CONCLUSION: Non-specialized radiologists may increase reading speed in prostate MRI with the help of a browser-based PI-RADS Score Calculator compared to reporting using the official PI-RADS v2.1 document without impairing interreader agreement or lesion-based diagnostic accuracy for detection of clinically significant PCa.

Accuracy of Conventional and Machine Learning Enhanced Chest Radiography for the Assessment of COVID-19 Pneumonia: Intra-Individual Comparison with CT.

PURPOSE: To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of conventional radiography (CXR) and machine learning enhanced CXR (mlCXR) for the detection and quantification of disease-extent in COVID-19 patients compared to chest-CT. METHODS: Real-time polymerase chain reaction (rt-PCR)-confirmed COVID-19-patients undergoing CXR from March to April 2020 together with COVID-19 negative patients as control group were retrospectively included. Two independent readers assessed CXR and mlCXR images for presence, disease extent and type (consolidation vs. ground-glass opacities (GGOs) of COVID-19-pneumonia. Further, readers had to assign confidence levels to their diagnosis. CT obtained ≤ 36 h from acquisition of CXR served as standard of reference. Inter-reader agreement, sensitivity for detection and disease extent of COVID-19-pneumonia compared to CT was calculated. McNemar test was used to test for significant differences. RESULTS: Sixty patients (21 females; median age 61 years, range 38-81 years) were included. Inter-reader agreement improved from good to excellent when mlCXR instead of CXR was used (k = 0.831 vs. k = 0.742). Sensitivity for pneumonia detection improved from 79.5% to 92.3%, however, on the cost of specificity 100% vs. 71.4% (p = 0.031). Overall, sensitivity for the detection of consolidation was higher than for GGO (37.5% vs. 70.4%; respectively). No differences could be found in disease extent estimation between mlCXR and CXR, even though the detection of GGO could be improved. Diagnostic confidence was better on mlCXR compared to CXR (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: In line with the current literature, the sensitivity for detection and quantification of COVID-19-pneumonia was moderate with CXR and could be improved when mlCXR was used for image interpretation.

Volumetric assessment of solid pulmonary nodules on ultralow-dose CT: a phantom study.

BACKGROUND: To reduce the radiation exposure from chest computed tomography (CT), ultralow-dose CT (ULDCT) protocols performed at sub-millisievert levels were previously tested for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules (PNs). The purpose of our study was to investigate the effect of ULDCT and iterative image reconstruction on volumetric measurements of solid PNs. METHODS: CT datasets of an anthropomorphic chest phantom containing solid microspheres were obtained with a third-generation dual-source CT at standard dose, 1/8th, 1/20th and 1/70th of standard dose [CT volume dose index (CTDIvol): 0.03-2.03 mGy]. Semi-automated volumetric measurements were performed on CT datasets reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and advanced modelled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE), at strength level 3 and 5. Absolute percentage error (APE) evaluated measurement accuracy related to the effective volume. Scan repetition differences were evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) assessed influence of different scan parameters on APE. Proportional differences (PDs) tested the effect of dose settings and reconstruction algorithms on volumetric measurements, as compared to the standard protocol (standard dose-FBP). RESULTS: Bland-Altman analysis revealed small mean interscan differences of APE with narrow limits of agreement (-0.1%±4.3% to -0.3%±3.8%). Dose settings (P<0.001), reconstruction algorithms (P<0.001), nodule diameters (P<0.001) and nodule density (P=0.011) had statistically significant influence on APE. Post-hoc Bonferroni tests showed slightly higher APE when scanning with 1/70th of standard dose [mean difference: 3.4%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5-4.3%; P<0.001], and for image reconstruction with ADMIRE5 (mean difference: 1.8%, 95% CI: 1.0-2.5%; P<0.001). No significant differences for scanning with 1/20th of standard dose (P=0.42), and image reconstruction with ADMIRE3 (P=0.19) were found. Scanning with 1/70th of standard dose and image reconstruction with FBP showed the widest range of PDs (-16.8% to 23.4%) compared to standard dose-FBP. CONCLUSIONS: Our phantom study showed no significant difference between nodule volume measurements on standard dose CT (CTDIvol: 2 mGy) and ULDCT with 1/20th of standard dose (CTDIvol: 0.10 mGy).

Breast Density Assessment in Young Women with Ultrasound based on Speed of Sound: Influence of the Menstrual Cycle.

To investigate changes in breast density (BD) during the menstrual cycle in young women in comparison to inter-breast and -segment changes as well as reproducibility of a novel Speed-of-Sound (SoS) Ultrasound (US) method.SoS-US uses a conventional US system with a reflector and a software add-on to quantify SoS in the retro-mammillary, inner and outer segments of both breasts. Twenty healthy women (18-40 years) with regular menstrual cycles were scanned twice with two weeks in-between. Three of these were additionally measured twice per week for 25 days. Average SoS (m/s) and ΔSoS (segment-variation SoS; m/s) were measured. Variations between follicular and luteal phases and changes over the four-week period were assessed. Inter-examiner and inter-reader agreements were also evaluated. Variances between cycle phases, examiners and readers were compared.No significant SoS difference was observed between follicular and luteal phases for the twenty women (P = .126), and between all different days for the three more frequently measured women (P = .892). Inter-reader (ICC = 0.999) and inter-examiner (ICC = 0.990) agreements were high. The SoS variance due to menstrual variations was not significantly larger than the inter-examiner uncertainty (P = .461). Inter-reader variations were significantly smaller than menstrual and examiner variations (P < .001).SoS-US showed high inter-examiner and inter-reader reproducibility. The alterations during the menstrual cycles were not significantly larger than the confidence interval of measurements.

Breast Cancer Assessment With Pulse-Echo Speed of Sound Ultrasound From Intrinsic Tissue Reflections: Proof-of-Concept.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to differentiate malignant and benign solid breast lesions with a novel ultrasound (US) technique, which measures speed of sound (SoS) using standard US transducers and intrinsic tissue reflections and scattering (speckles) as internal reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant prospective comparison study was performed with prior written informed consent from 20 women. Ten women with histological proven breast cancer and 10 with fibroadenoma were measured. A conventional US system with a linear probe was used for SoS-US (SonixTouch; Ultrasonix, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada). Tissue speckle reflections served as a timing reference for the US signals transmitted through the breasts. Relative phase inconsistencies were detected using plane wave measurements from different angular directions, and SoS images with 0.5-mm resolution were generated using a spatial domain reconstruction algorithm. The SoS of tumors were compared with the breast density of a larger cohort of 106 healthy women. RESULTS: Breast lesions show focal increments ΔSoS (meters per second) with respect to the tissue background. Peak ΔSoS values were evaluated. Breast carcinoma showed significantly higher ΔSoS than fibroadenomas ([INCREMENT]SoS > 41.64 m/s: sensitivity, 90%; specificity, 80%; area under curve, 0.910) and healthy breast tissue of different densities (area under curve, 0.938; sensitivity, 90%; specificity, 96.5%). The lesion localization in SoS-US images was consistent with B-mode imaging and repeated SoS-US measurements were reproducible. CONCLUSIONS: Using SoS-US, based on conventional US and tissue speckles as timing reference, breast carcinoma showed significantly higher SoS values than fibroadenoma and healthy breast tissue of different densities. The SoS presents a promising technique for differentiating solid breast lesions.

Breast-density assessment with hand-held ultrasound: A novel biomarker to assess breast cancer risk and to tailor screening?

OBJECTIVES: To assess feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of a novel hand-held ultrasound (US) method for breast density assessment that measures the speed of sound (SoS), in comparison to the ACR mammographic (MG) categories. METHODS: ACR-MG density (a=fatty to d=extremely dense) and SoS-US were assessed in the retromamillary, inner and outer segments of 106 women by two radiographers. A conventional US system was used for SoS-US. A reflector served as timing reference for US signals transmitted through the breasts. Four blinded readers assessed average SoS (m/s), ΔSoS (segment-variation SoS; m/s) and the ACR-MG density. The highest SoS and ΔSoS values of the three segments were used for MG-ACR whole breast comparison. RESULTS: SoS-US breasts were examined in <2 min. Mean SoS values of densities a-d were 1,421 m/s (SD 14), 1,432 m/s (SD 17), 1,448 m/s (SD 20) and 1,500 m/s (SD 31), with significant differences between all groups (p<0.001). The SoS-US comfort scores and inter-reader agreement were significantly better than those for MG (1.05 vs. 2.05 and 0.982 vs. 0.774; respectively). A strong segment correlation between SoS and ACR-MG breast density was evident (rs=0.622, p=<0.001) and increased for full breast classification (rs=0.746, p=<0.001). SoS-US allowed diagnosis of dense breasts (ACR c and d) with sensitivity 86.2 %, specificity 85.2 % and AUC 0.887. CONCLUSIONS: Using hand-held SoS-US, radiographers measured breast density without discomfort, readers evaluated measurements with high inter-reader agreement, and SoS-US correlated significantly with ACR-MG breast-density categories. KEY POINTS: • The novel speed-of-sound ultrasound correlated significantly with mammographic ACR breast density categories. • Radiographers measured breast density without women discomfort or radiation. • SoS-US can be implemented on a standard US machine. • SoS-US shows potential for a quantifiable, cost-effective assessment of breast density.

Organ Dose and Attributable Cancer Risk in Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography.

PURPOSE: Lung cancer screening with CT has been recently recommended for decreasing lung cancer mortality. The radiation dose of CT, however, must be kept as low as reasonably achievable for reducing potential stochastic risks from ionizing radiation. The purpose of this study was to calculate individual patients' lung doses and to estimate cancer risks in low-dose CT (LDCT) in comparison with a standard dose CT (SDCT) protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 47 adult patients (mean age 63.0 ± 5.7 years) undergoing chest CT on a third-generation dual-source scanner. 23/47 patients (49%) had a non-enhanced chest SDCT, 24 patients (51%) underwent LDCT at 100 kVp with spectral shaping at a dose equivalent to a chest x-ray. 3D-dose distributions were obtained from Monte Carlo simulations for each patient, taking into account their body size and individual CT protocol. Based on the dose distributions, patient-specific lung doses were calculated and relative cancer risk was estimated according to BEIR VII recommendations. RESULTS: As compared to SDCT, the LDCT protocol allowed for significant organ dose and cancer risk reductions (p<0.001). On average, lung dose was reduced from 7.7 mGy to 0.3 mGy when using LDCT, which was associated with lowering of the cancer risk from 8.6 to 0.35 per 100'000 cases. A strong linear correlation between lung dose and patient effective diameter was found for both protocols (R2 = 0.72 and R2 = 0.75 for SDCT and LDCT, respectively). CONCLUSION: Use of a LDCT protocol for chest CT with a dose equivalent to a chest x-ray allows for significant lung dose and cancer risk reduction from ionizing radiation.