Economic burden of respiratory syncytial and parainfluenza viruses in children of upper-middle-income countries: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and assess the current evidence available about the costs of managing hospitalized pediatric patients diagnosed with Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and Parainfluenza Virus Type 3 (PIV3) in upper-middle-income countries. METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review across seven key databases from database inception to July 2022. Costs extracted were converted into 2022 International Dollars using the Purchasing Power Parity-adjusted. PROSPERO identifier: CRD42020225757. RESULTS: No eligible study for PIV3 was recovered. For RSV, cost analysis and COI studies were performed for populations in Colombia, China, Malaysia, and Mexico. Comparing the total economic impact, the lowest cost per patient at the pediatric ward was observed in Malaysia ($ 347.60), while the highest was in Colombia ($ 709.66). On the other hand, at pediatric ICU, the lowest cost was observed in China ($ 1068.26), while the highest was in Mexico ($ 3815.56). Although there is no consensus on the major cost driver, all included studies described that the medications (treatment) consumed over 30% of the total cost. A high rate of inappropriate prescription drugs was observed. CONCLUSION: The present study highlighted how RSV infection represents a substantial economic burden to health care systems and to society. The findings of the included studies suggest a possible association between baseline risk status and expenditures. Moreover, it was observed that an important amount of the cost is destinated to treatments that have no evidence or support in most clinical practice guidelines.

Cost of Illness in Patients With COVID-19 Admitted in Three Brazilian Public Hospitals.

OBJECTIVES: The severity and transmissibility of COVID-19 justifies the need to identify the factors associated with its cost of illness (CoI). This study aimed to identify CoI, cost predictors, and cost drivers in the management of patients with COVID-19 from hospital and Brazil's Public Health System (SUS) perspectives. METHODS: This is a multicenter study that evaluated the CoI in patients diagnosed of COVID-19 who reached hospital discharge or died before being discharged between March and September 2020. Sociodemographic, clinical, and hospitalization data were collected to characterize and identify predictors of costs per patients and cost drivers per admission. RESULTS: A total of 1084 patients were included in the study. For hospital perspective, being overweight or obese, being between 65 and 74 years old, or being male showed an increased cost of 58.4%, 42.9%, and 42.5%, respectively. From SUS perspective, the same predictors of cost per patient increase were identified. The median cost per admission was estimated at US$359.78 and US$1385.80 for the SUS and hospital perspectives, respectively. In addition, patients who stayed between 1 and 4 days in the intensive care unit (ICU) had 60.9% higher costs than non-ICU patients; these costs significantly increased with the length of stay (LoS). The main cost driver was the ICU-LoS and COVID-19 ICU daily for hospital and SUS perspectives, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The predictors of increased cost per patient at admission identified were overweight or obesity, advanced age, and male sex, and the main cost driver identified was the ICU-LoS. Time-driven activity-based costing studies, considering outpatient, inpatient, and long COVID-19, are needed to optimize our understanding about cost of COVID-19.

Economic burden of respiratory syncytial and parainfluenza viruses in children of upper-middle-income countries: a systematic review

Abstract Objective: To identify and assess the current evidence available about the costs of managing hospitalized pediatric patients diagnosed with Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and Parainfluenza Virus Type 3 (PIV3) in upper-middle-income countries. Methods: The authors conducted a systematic review across seven key databases from database inception to July 2022. Costs extracted were converted into 2022 International Dollars using the Purchasing Power Parity-adjusted. PROSPERO identifier: CRD42020225757. Results: No eligible study for PIV3 was recovered. For RSV, cost analysis and COI studies were performed for populations in Colombia, China, Malaysia, and Mexico. Comparing the total economic impact, the lowest cost per patient at the pediatric ward was observed in Malaysia ($ 347.60), while the highest was in Colombia ($ 709.66). On the other hand, at pediatric ICU, the lowest cost was observed in China ($ 1068.26), while the highest was in Mexico ($ 3815.56). Although there is no consensus on the major cost driver, all included studies described that the medications (treatment) consumed over 30% of the total cost. A high rate of inappropriate prescription drugs was observed. Conclusion: The present study highlighted how RSV infection represents a substantial economic burden to health care systems and to society. The findings of the included studies suggest a possible association between baseline risk status and expenditures. Moreover, it was observed that an important amount of the cost is destinated to treatments that have no evidence or support in most clinical practice guidelines.

Análise dos custos diretos e indiretos da COVID-19 em um hospital brasileiro / Analysis of the direct and indirect costs of COVID-19 in a Brazilian hospital

Objetivo: Avaliar os custos diretos na perspectiva hospitalar e do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), bem como os custos indiretos de pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19. Métodos: Estudo observacional com coleta de dados por micro e macrocusteio, realizado com pacientes admitidos por COVID-19 em um hospital paulista (março a setembro de 2020). Custos indiretos foram obtidos pelos métodos de capital humano e de anos de vida ajustados pela incapacidade (DALY). Análises de Mann-Whitney e regressão linear foram realizadas. Resultados: Foram incluídos 158 indivíduos com mediana de idade de 57 anos (IIQ 42-68 anos). A mediana de custo da internação na perspectiva do SUS e hospitalar foi de, respectivamente, R$ 2.009,46 (IIQ: R$ 1.649,11; R$ 4.847,36), principalmente devido à unidade de terapia intensiva (UTI), e R$ 19.055,91 (IIQ: R$ 8.399,47; R$ 38.438,00), principalmente devido a recursos humanos. Tempo total de internação (p < 0,001), óbito (p < 0,001) e ventilação invasiva (p < 0,001) foram preditores de aumento de custo. Foi identificada perda de 381,5 DALY e perda de produtividade de 128 anos, equivalente a US$ 855.307. Conclusão: Os principais direcionadores de custo foram recursos humanos e UTI. Entretanto, na perspectiva da sociedade, foi identificado o maior impacto devido à perda de produtividade e DALY. Tempo de hospitalização foi um dos grandes contribuidores do custo, e esse fator pode estar atrelado a gravidade da doença e protocolos de cuidado ao paciente.

Objective: To evaluate the direct costs from the hospital and Unified Health System (SUS) perspective, as well as the indirect costs of patients hospitalized by COVID-19. Methods: Observational study with data collection by micro- and macro-costing, carried out with patients hospitalized in a hospital in São Paulo (March-September 2020). Indirect costs were obtained using human capital and disability-adjusted life years (DALY) methods. Mann-Whitney and linear regression analyzes were performed. Results: 158 individuals were included, with a median age of 57 years (IQR 42-68 years). The median cost of admission in the SUS and hospital perspective was, respectively, R$ 2,009.46 (IQR: R$ 1,649.11; R$ 4,847.36), mainly due to the intensive care unit (ICU) and R$ 19,055.91 (IQR: R$ 8,399.47; R$ 38,438.00), mainly due to human resources. The total length of stay in hospital (p < 0.001), death (p < 0.001) and invasive ventilation (p < 0.001) were predictors of cost increase.

Hospitalization costs of coronaviruses diseases in upper-middle-income countries: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19, SARS and MERS are diseases that present an important health burden worldwide. This situation demands resource allocation to the healthcare system, affecting especially middle- and low-income countries. Thus, identifying the main cost drivers is relevant to optimize patient care and resource allocation. OBJECTIVE: To systematically identify and summarize the current status of knowledge on direct medical hospitalization costs of SARS, MERS, or COVID-19 in Upper-Middle-Income Countries. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review across seven key databases (PubMed, EMBASE, BVS Portal, CINAHL, CRD library, MedRxiv and Research Square) from database inception to February 2021. Costs extracted were converted into 2021 International Dollars using the Purchasing Power Parity-adjusted. The assessment of quality was based on the protocol by the BMJ and CHEERS. PROSPERO 2020: CRD42020225757. RESULTS: No eligible study about SARS or MERS was recovered. For COVID-19, five studies presented cost analysis performed in Brazil, China, Iran, and Turkey. Regarding total direct medical costs, the lowest cost per patient at ward was observed in Turkey ($900.08), while the highest in Brazil ($5,093.38). At ICU, the lowest was in Turkey ($2,984.78), while the highest was in China ($52,432.87). Service care was the most expressive (58% to 88%) cost driver of COVID-19 patients at ward. At ICU, there was no consensus between service care (54% to 87%) and treatment (72% to 81%) as key burdens of total cost. CONCLUSION: Our findings elucidate the importance of COVID-19 on health-economic outcomes. The marked heterogeneity among studies leaded to substantially different results and made challenging the comparison of data to estimate pooled results for single countries or regions. Further studies concerning cost estimates from standardized analysis may provide clearer data for a more substantial analysis. This may help care providers and policy makers to organize care for patients in the most efficient way.

Assessment of the adherence to and costs of the prophylaxis protocol for venous thromboembolism.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate adherence to the therapeutic prophylaxis protocol for venous thromboembolism (VTE) as well as the costs of this practice. METHODS: A descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted at a State General Hospital in Brazil through reports of drug dispensions, prescriptions and risk stratification of patients. Adherence to the VTE prophylaxis protocol was monitored. The tests for VTE diagnosis measured the adherence to therapeutic prophylaxis treatment, and the purchase prices of the drugs went into the calculation of drug therapy costs. The level of adherence to prescriptions for VTE prophylaxis in the hospital was classified as "adherence", "non-adherence" and "justified non-adherence" when compared with the protocol. RESULTS: Protocol adherence was observed for 50 (30.9%) patients, and non-adherence was observed for 63 (38.9%) patients, generating an additional cost of $180.40/month. Justified non-adherence in 49 (30.2%) patients generated $514.71/month in savings due to a reduction in the number of daily administrations of unfractionated heparin while still providing an effective method for preventing VTE. Twenty-six patients stratified as having medium to high risk of VTE who did not receive prophylaxis were identified, generating $154.41 in savings. However, these data should be evaluated with caution since the risks and outcomes associated with not preventing VTE outweigh the economy achieved from not prescribing a drug when a patient needs it. The only case of VTE identified during the study period was related to justified non-adherence to the protocol. CONCLUSION: The protocol is based on scientific evidence that describes an effective therapy to prevent VTE. However, the protocol should be updated because the justifications for non-adherence are based on scientific evidence, and this justified non-adherence generates savings and yields effective disease prevention.

Assessment of the adherence to and costs of the prophylaxis protocol for venous thromboembolism

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate adherence to the therapeutic prophylaxis protocol for venous thromboembolism (VTE) as well as the costs of this practice. METHODS: A descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted at a State General Hospital in Brazil through reports of drug dispensions, prescriptions and risk stratification of patients. Adherence to the VTE prophylaxis protocol was monitored. The tests for VTE diagnosis measured the adherence to therapeutic prophylaxis treatment, and the purchase prices of the drugs went into the calculation of drug therapy costs. The level of adherence to prescriptions for VTE prophylaxis in the hospital was classified as "adherence", "non-adherence" and "justified non-adherence" when compared with the protocol. RESULTS: Protocol adherence was observed for 50 (30.9%) patients, and non-adherence was observed for 63 (38.9%) patients, generating an additional cost of $180.40/month. Justified non-adherence in 49 (30.2%) patients generated $514.71/month in savings due to a reduction in the number of daily administrations of unfractionated heparin while still providing an effective method for preventing VTE. Twenty-six patients stratified as having medium to high risk of VTE who did not receive prophylaxis were identified, generating $154.41 in savings. However, these data should be evaluated with caution since the risks and outcomes associated with not preventing VTE outweigh the economy achieved from not prescribing a drug when a patient needs it. The only case of VTE identified during the study period was related to justified non-adherence to the protocol. CONCLUSION: The protocol is based on scientific evidence that describes an effective therapy to prevent VTE. However, the protocol should be updated because the justifications for non-adherence are based on scientific evidence, and this justified non-adherence generates savings and yields effective disease prevention.

Safety assessment of omeprazole use: a review

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Risks regarding hospital admission due to adverse drug reactions and drug interactions from use of omeprazole have been reported. The question guiding the present review was "Which adverse events occur in patients using omeprazole in a Food and Drug Administration-approved and/or off-label manner?" It was also proposed to evaluate the safety of use of omeprazole. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative narrative review with critical evaluation, in a public university. METHODS: The PubMed, SCOPUS, LILACS, SciELO, EMBASE and EBSCO databases were searched on July 31, 2018. Studies evaluating adverse events were screened. RESULTS: 72 articles were included, among which 58 reported on adverse drug events (47, adverse drug reactions; 5, drug interactions; and 6, situations of ineffectiveness). 28 adverse drug reactions not described in compendia and drug leaflets were described in these studies: myocardial infarction (6); stroke (2); spontaneous abortion (1); proliferative changes (1); chills (1); heart failure (1); thrombosis (2); and dementia (1), among others. Severe adverse reactions, for instance cardiac problems, Steven-Johnson syndrome and proliferative changes, were identified. The antiplatelet effects of drugs such as clopidogrel, in patients who underwent heart-related surgery, increased the risk of developing cardiac problems, such as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke. In newly transplanted patients, decreased absorption of mycophenolate mofetil occurred, thus leading to rejection of transplanted organs. CONCLUSION: Use of omeprazole should be monitored primarily in patients with heart disorders using antiplatelet agents concomitantly, and in newly transplanted patients using mycophenolic acid, in order to avoid serious adverse reactions.

Incidents reporting: barriers and strategies to promote safety culture.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to identify the barriers of underreporting, the factors that promote motivation of health professionals to report, and strategies to enhance incidents reporting. METHOD: Group conversations were carried out within a hospital multidisciplinary team. A mediator stimulated reflection among the subjects about the theme. Sixty-five health professionals were enrolled. RESULTS: Complacency and ambition were barriers exceeded. Lack of responsibility about culture of reporting was the new barrier observed. There is a belief only nurses should report incidents. The strategies related to motivation reported were: feedback; educational intervention with hospital staff; and simplified tools for reporting (electronic or manual), which allow filling critical information and traceability of management risk team to improve the quality of report. CONCLUSION: Ordinary and practical strategies should be developed to optimize incidents reporting, to make people aware about their responsibilities about the culture of reporting and to improve the risk communication and the quality of healthcare and patient safety.

Assessment tool for potentially inappropriate medication use in the elderly: a scoping review protocol

Potentially Inappropriate Medication for the elderly (PIM) are drugs in which the safety risks may exceed the benefits, especially when there are safer alternatives. The use of PIM is associated with increased hospitalizations and it is estimated that one every five prescriptions presents at least one PIM. In this context, there are several assessment tools for identification of PIM. The first assessment tool developed was Beers criteria and since its publication, new tools have been developed. The objective of this scoping review is to explore studies presenting assessment tools of PIM to map characteristics, justifications, and therapeutic equivalents. This review will consider studies that developed or validated an assessment tool of PIM. Electronic searches will be performed in PubMed and Scopus with no time limit. Two researchers, independently, will select registries and extract data of studies and tool characteristics, PIM and potentially inappropriate interaction, condition, justification, and therapeutic equivalents. The findings will be presented in narrative form including tables and figures to aid in data presentation, where appropriate.(AU)

Safety assessment of omeprazole use: a review.

BACKGROUND: Risks regarding hospital admission due to adverse drug reactions and drug interactions from use of omeprazole have been reported. The question guiding the present review was "Which adverse events occur in patients using omeprazole in a Food and Drug Administration-approved and/or off-label manner?" It was also proposed to evaluate the safety of use of omeprazole. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative narrative review with critical evaluation, in a public university. METHODS: The PubMed, SCOPUS, LILACS, SciELO, EMBASE and EBSCO databases were searched on July 31, 2018. Studies evaluating adverse events were screened. RESULTS: 72 articles were included, among which 58 reported on adverse drug events (47, adverse drug reactions; 5, drug interactions; and 6, situations of ineffectiveness). 28 adverse drug reactions not described in compendia and drug leaflets were described in these studies: myocardial infarction (6); stroke (2); spontaneous abortion (1); proliferative changes (1); chills (1); heart failure (1); thrombosis (2); and dementia (1), among others. Severe adverse reactions, for instance cardiac problems, Steven-Johnson syndrome and proliferative changes, were identified. The antiplatelet effects of drugs such as clopidogrel, in patients who underwent heart-related surgery, increased the risk of developing cardiac problems, such as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke. In newly transplanted patients, decreased absorption of mycophenolate mofetil occurred, thus leading to rejection of transplanted organs. CONCLUSION: Use of omeprazole should be monitored primarily in patients with heart disorders using antiplatelet agents concomitantly, and in newly transplanted patients using mycophenolic acid, in order to avoid serious adverse reactions.

Imputation of adverse drug reactions: Causality assessment in hospitals.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Different algorithms have been developed to standardize the causality assessment of adverse drug reactions (ADR). Although most share common characteristics, the results of the causality assessment are variable depending on the algorithm used. Therefore, using 10 different algorithms, the study aimed to compare inter-rater and multi-rater agreement for ADR causality assessment and identify the most consistent to hospitals. METHODS: Using ten causality algorithms, four judges independently assessed the first 44 cases of ADRs reported during the first year of implementation of a risk management service in a medium complexity hospital in the state of Sao Paulo (Brazil). Owing to variations in the terminology used for causality, the equivalent imputation terms were grouped into four categories: definite, probable, possible and unlikely. Inter-rater and multi-rater agreement analysis was performed by calculating the Cohen´s and Light´s kappa coefficients, respectively. RESULTS: None of the algorithms showed 100% reproducibility in the causal imputation. Fair inter-rater and multi-rater agreement was found. Emanuele (1984) and WHO-UMC (2010) algorithms showed a fair rate of agreement between the judges (k = 0.36). INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Although the ADR causality assessment algorithms were poorly reproducible, our data suggest that WHO-UMC algorithm is the most consistent for imputation in hospitals, since it allows evaluating the quality of the report. However, to improve the ability of assessing the causality using algorithms, it is necessary to include criteria for the evaluation of drug-related problems, which may be related to confounding variables that underestimate the causal association.

Analysis of extemporaneous oral liquid from commercially available drugs in hospital

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to identify drugs that received dose adjustments (DA) and pharmaceutical alternatives (PA) that avoid DA, and calculate the economic percentage of this replacement. A descriptive, observational and cross-sectional study was performed in a second level hospital. The pharmacy and nursing services was accompanied to identify the drugs that received DA and the compounding techniques. After identifying all the drugs that received DA, was identified in the Brazilian market the corresponding pharmaceutical alternative, with the Drugs Price List of Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency. For those drugs that was not available any PA, was performed a research of studies that describe compounding techniques in international scientific databases. Was identify 88 drugs that received DA, and these, 50 do not have any PA. Were identified compounding techniques to 40 drugs. Although any drug has your own particularity of compounding, the compounding techniques can be grouped in five categories. The standardization of 29 drugs can reduce in 28% the DA procedure and cost saving of 34,85%/month. We can conclude that every three drugs prescribed, one received DA and every three DA, one can be avoided by the selection of 29 PA, saving cost as well. The use and standardization of five techniques would attend the pharmaceutics recommendations for better dissolution, bioavailability and patient safety.

Análise de percentual econômico dos medicamentos adquiridos por via de ações judiciais / Percent economic analysis of acquired drugs purchases through lawsuits

Objetivo: Propôs-se avaliar o percentual econômico do processo de compra dos medicamentos por ação judicial do DRSII (Departamento Regional de Saúde)do estado de São Paulo. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo descritivo. Foram coletados os seguintes dados nas ações judiciais: nome do medicamento, quantidade fornecida, preço de compra e preço de tabela. Calculou-se o preço unitário e o preço total, segundo o valor pago e o preço de tabela de cada medicamento. Para a análise econômica, utilizou-se o indicador de resultado descrito no "Manual de indicadores principias de situação de políticas farmacêuticas", preconizado pela OMS. Resultados: Dados evidenciaram que o processo de aquisição foi efetivo porque gerou uma economia de 51,6% (2,2-99,1%). No entanto, em alguns itens como a enoxaparina e cloridrato de pioglitazona, o processo de aquisição poderia melhorar porque houve um prejuízo de 404,4% e 139,0%, respectivamente. Conclusão: A maioria dos itens adquiridos foi da atenção básica de saúde (89,4 %), evidenciando conhecimento das petições dos medicamentos do Componente Especializado da Assistência Farmacêutica e seus Protocolos Clínicos. Considera-se que a análise do percentual econômico é um indicador de resultado importante porque contribui para avaliar a eficiência do processo de aquisição, identifica os municípios que mais ações peticionam, auxiliando na avaliação e atualização da REMUME (Relação Municipal de Medicamentos Essenciais) e o desempenho da assistência farmacêutica municipal.

Objective: This article aims to evaluate the saving percentage of medicine acquisition from lawsuits in DRSIII (Health Regional Department) of State of São Paulo. Method: This is a descriptive study. The following data from lawsuit documents were collected: drug name, provided quantity, purchasing price and table price. Furthermore, a calculation was made to obtain unitary price, total price based on paid value and table price for each drug. In addition, the "Manual for Core Indicators on Country Pharmaceutical Situations" from WHO was applied to obtain an economic analysis. Results: The collected data from acquisition process showed a saving percentage of 51.6% (range of 2.2-99.1%). However, some items did not have a great saving such as enoxaparin and pioglitazone hydrochloride which showed a leakage of 404.4% and 139.0%, respectively. Conclusion: Most items purchased was health primary care (89.4%), showing knowledge of clinical component specialized pharmaceutical services protocols. Saving percentage of medicine acquisition is a great indicator due to it shows the purchase process efficiency and identifies which municipal had a better medicine acquisition; assisting a REMUME (Essential Medicines Municipal List) upgrade and evaluates the municipal pharmaceutical care performance.

Safety assessment of essential medicines for elderly people: a bibliographic survey

Certain medicines are considered potentially inappropriate (PIM) for elderly people as they increase the risk of adverse drug events (ADE) and because safer alternative therapies are available on the market. In this context, in order to identify the instruments that assess the quality of medical prescriptions for elderly and to determine which drugs are considered PIM, a bibliographic survey was conducted in PUBMED, LILACS and PAHO databases, in February and March/2010. The search strategy included the use of health descriptors and a manual search in the references cited by selected papers. During the period of data collection, 15 instruments were identified. In 2012, with the publication of the update of Beers criteria, this instrument was included in the study. We identified 163 PIM of 25 therapeutic classes, of which 125 (76.7%) are marketed in Brazil. Of these, 31 (24.8%) are essential medicines (RENAME 2012), of which 13 have safer therapeutic equivalents and 19 (15.2%) are over-the-counter drugs. Data suggest the need for inclusion of safer alternatives for the elderly in the national list of essential medicines and the pharmaceutical care for early detection of ADE in this age group, in order to contribute to the safe use of medicines.

Determinados medicamentos são considerados potencialmente inapropriados (MPI) para idosos, por aumentarem o risco de ocorrência de eventos adversos a medicamentos (EAM) e por existirem alternativas terapêuticas mais seguras. Neste contexto, com o intuito de identificar os instrumentos que avaliam a qualidade das prescrições médicas para idosos e verificar quais medicamentos são considerados MPI, levantamento bibliográfico foi realizado nas bases de dados PUBMED, LILACS e PAHO em fevereiro e março de 2010. Para a seleção dos manuscritos utilizaram-se descritores em saúde e busca manual nas referências bibliográficas dos artigos identificados. No período da coleta de dados, foram identificados 15 instrumentos. Em 2012, com a publicação da atualização da lista de Beers, este instrumento foi incluído no estudo. Foram identificados 163 MPI de 25 classes terapêuticas, dos quais 125 (76,7%) são comercializados no Brasil. Destes, 31 (24,8%) são medicamentos essenciais (RENAME 2012), sendo que para 13 deles há equivalentes terapêuticos mais seguros e 19 (15,2%) são medicamentos isentos de prescrição. Os dados sugerem a necessidade de inclusão de medicamentos mais seguros para idosos na lista nacional de medicamentos essenciais e do monitoramento farmacoterapêutico para a detecção precoce de EAM nesta faixa etária para contribuir com o uso seguro de medicamentos.

Intervenções educativas com usuários de medicamentos como estratégias terapêuticas / Educational interventions among medicine users as a therapeutic strategy

Foi realizada uma revisão e análise da literatura sobre intervenções educativas (IE) com usuários de medicamentos. Para isso, foram consultadas bases de dados empregando-se descritores relacionados à educação, saúde e cuidado farmacêutico, no período de 1997 a 28/02/2011. Foram selecionados 21 artigos relacionados à IE com usuários de medicamentos, sendo que 18 (85,7%) deles referiam-se a trabalhos desenvolvidos na atenção básica a saúde. As IE mais comumente relatadas nos artigos selecionados foram: palestras, grupos de discussões e material educativo. Como resultados positivos foram relatados: melhora da qualidade de vida (melhor aceitação da doença), vantagens econômicas (redução de retornos e consultas), melhora clínica (redução dos riscos, prevenção de complicações).

A review and analysis of the literature on educative interventions (EI) for medicine users was carried out. For this purpose, databases were searched by employing descriptors related to pharmaceutical care, education and health, covering the period from 1997 to early 2011. A set of 21 articles related to EI with medicine users were selected, 18 (85.7%) of which referred to studies on basic health care. The EI most commonly reported in the articles were: talks, group discussions and educative material. The positive outcomes reported were: improvement in quality of life (better acceptance of the disease), economic advantages (reduction in number of medical consultations) and clinical improvement (risk reduction, prevention of complications).

Assessment of pharmacotherapeutic safety of medical prescriptions for elderly residents in a long-term care facility

The present study aimed to estimate the prevalence of elderly using potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) and with occurrence of potentially hazardous drug interactions (PHDI); to identify the risk factors for the prescription of PIM and to evaluate the impact of pharmaceutical intervention (PI) for the prescription of safer therapeutic alternatives. Therefore, a cross-sectional study was performed in a long-term care facility in São Paulo State, between December/2010 and January/2011. The medical records of the patients >60 years old who took any drugs were consulted to assess the pharmacotherapeutic safety of the medical prescriptions, in order to identify PIM and PHDI, according to the Beers (2003) and World Health Organization criteria, respectively. PI consisted of a guidance letter to the physician responsible for the institution, with the suggestions of safer equivalent therapeutics. Approximately 88% of the elderly took at least one drug, and for 30% of them the PIM had been prescribed. Most of the PIM identified (53.4%) act on the central nervous system. Among the 13 different DI detected, 6 are considered PHDI. Polypharmacy was detected as a risk factor for PIM prescription. After the PI there was no change in medical prescriptions of patients who had been prescribed PIM or PHDI. The data suggests that PI performed by letter, as the only interventional, method was ineffective. To contribute it a wide dissemination of PIM and PHDI among prescriber professionals is necessary for the selection of safer treatment for elderly. Additionally, a pharmacist should be part of the health care team in order to help promote rational use of medicines.

O presente estudo teve como objetivos estimar a prevalência de idosos em uso de medicamentos potencialmente impróprios (MPI) e com ocorrência de interações medicamentosas potencialmente perigosas (IMPP); identificar os fatores de risco para a prescrição de MPI e avaliar o impacto de intervenção farmacêutica (IF) para a prescrição de alternativas terapêuticas mais seguras. Para tanto, realizou-se estudo transversal em instituição de longa permanência do interior de São Paulo, de dezembro/2010 a janeiro/ 2011. Os prontuários médicos dos pacientes >60 anos e que utilizavam pelo menos um medicamento foram consultados para avaliar a segurança farmacoterapêutica das prescrições médicas, identificando-se os MPI e as IMPP, segundo critérios de Beers (2003) e o critério da Organização Mundial da Saúde, respectivamente. A IF constou de carta de orientação ao médico da instituição, com sugestão de equivalentes terapêuticos mais seguros. Aproximadamente 88% dos idosos haviam utilizado pelo menos um medicamento e, para 30% deles, havia pelo menos um MPI prescrito. A maioria dos MPI identificados (53,4%) age no sistema nervoso central. Entre as 13 interações medicamentosas detectadas, 6 são consideradas IMPP. A polimedicação foi detectada como fator de risco para a prescrição de MPI. Após a IF, não houve alterações nas prescrições médicas dos pacientes que apresentavam MPI e IMPP prescritos. Os dados sugerem que IF realizadas por cartas, como único método interventivo, não são efetivas. Para contribuir com a seleção de farmacoterapia mais segura para idosos é necessária ampla divulgação dos MPI e IMPP entre os profissionais prescritores. Além disso, o farmacêutico deve fazer parte das equipes de saúde para auxiliar na promoção do uso racional de medicamentos.

Opiniões e atitudes dos médicos frente às ações promocionais da indústria farmacêutica / Doctors opinions and attitudes to pharmaceutical industry promotion mix / Opiniones y actitudes de los médicos en relación a las acciones de promoción de la industria farmacéutica

A indústria farmacêutica investe maciçamente na promoção de seus produtos, e estudos sugerem que essas ações influenciam a prescrição médica. O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar as opiniões e atitudes de médicos frente às ações promocionais dos laboratórios. A metodologia adotada foi a investigação de caráter descritivo, transversal e observacional com delineamento do tipo inquérito. Utilizou-se como instrumento de coleta de dados o questionário, que foi encaminhado aos médicos de Araraquara (SP). A análise dos dados incluiu estudo de associação por meio do teste de qui-quadrado. Os resultados indicaram que os médicos relacionam-se com os propagandistas (98por cento) por considerá-los úteis (55por cento), mas não como fonte principal de atualização (86por cento). Para 62por cento, suas prescrições não são influenciadas por tais relacionamentos, enquanto 24por cento, assim como os recém-formados (37por cento), discordam que os médicos em geral são influenciados. A maioria também discorda que sejam influenciados pelas cortesias (86por cento) ou pelas amostras grátis (70por cento), mas apenas 38por cento acreditam que os colegas não sejam influenciados pelas amostras. Quanto à ética desses recebimentos, 57por cento consideram ser apropriado quando beneficiam os pacientes, mas somente 32por cento quando para uso pessoal. Concluiu-se, com base nas evidências dos resultados, que os médicos são vulneráveis às influências do marketing, sendo necessários mecanismos e intervenções para que a prescrição de medicamentos seja pautada unicamente por critérios de eficácia, segurança, conveniência e acessibilidade ao paciente.

The pharmaceutical industry invests heavily in promoting their products, and studies suggest that these actions influence doctor?s prescribing. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the opinions and attitudes of doctors when facing promotional activities of the laboratories. To this end, questionnaires were sent to doctors in Araraquara (SP) containing statements on the subject. Data analysis included study of the association by the chi-square. The results indicated that physicians relate to the propagandists (98percent) by considering them useful (55percent), but not as a main source update (86percent). For 62percent of them their prescriptions are not influenced by such relationships, while 24percent disagree that doctors in general are influenced as well as new graduates (37percent). The majority also disagrees that are influenced by amenities (86percent) or free samples (70percent) but only 38percent believe their colleagues are not influenced by the samples. As for the ethics of these receipts, 57percent considered to be appropriate when benefit patients, but only 32percent while for personal use. The results show that doctors are vulnerable to the influences of marketing. Therefore, mechanisms and interventions are needed for prescribing drugs solely by criteria of effectiveness, safety, convenience and accessibility to the patient.

La industria farmacéutica invierte fuertemente en la promoción de sus productos, y los estudios sugieren que esas acciones influyen en la prescripción médica. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar las opiniones y actitudes de los médicos frente a las acciones promocionales de los laboratorios. Estudio de carácter descriptivo, transversal e de observación, con lineamiento de tipo inquisitorio. Con este fin, se enviaron cuestionarios a los médicos en Araraquara (SP). El análisis de datos incluyó el estudio de asociación por la chi-cuadrado. Los resultados indicaron que los médicos se relacionan con los propagandistas (98por ciento) por considerarlos útiles (55por ciento), pero no como una fuente principal de actualización (86por ciento). El 62por ciento de sus recetas no son influenciados por este tipo de relaciones, mientras que el 24por ciento, así como los nuevos graduados (37por ciento), no están de acuerdo en que los médicos en general estén influenciados. La mayoría también no está de acuerdo que sean influenciados por las cortesías (86por ciento) o por las muestras gratuitas (70por ciento), sin embargo, sólo el 38por ciento creen que sus colegas no estén influenciados por las muestras. En cuanto a la ética de estos ingresos, el 57por ciento lo considera adecuado cuando los pacientes se benefician, mientras que sólo el 32por ciento, cuando es de uso personal. Los resultados muestran que los médicos son vulnerables a las influencias de la comercialización, son necesarias mecanismos e intervenciones para que la prescripción de medicamentos sea guiada únicamente por criterios de eficacia, seguridad, comodidad y accesibilidad para el paciente.