Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Nucl Med ; 28(4): 371-80, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24599824

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Although [(18)F]-FDG is a useful oncologic PET tracer, FDG uptake is known to be low in a certain type of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). [(18)F]-fluoroacetate ((18)F-FACE) is an [(18)F] fluorinated acetate, which is known to be converted into fatty acids, incorporated in membrane and is expected to be a promising oncologic PET tracer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of (18)F-FACE as an oncologic PET tracer in preclinical study in healthy volunteers and in patients with liver tumors. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy volunteers (age 48.2 ± 12.9 years old; 15 male and 9 female) and ten patients with liver tumor (age 72.1 ± 7.0 years old; 6 male and 4 female) were included. We performed whole-body static PET/CT scan using (18)F-FACE (n = 34) and (18)F-FDG (n = 5 for volunteers, n = 8 for patients) on each day, respectively. Qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis of tumors (5 HCCs, 1 cholangiocellular carcinoma, 4 metastatic tumors from colon cancer and P-NET) were performed using SUVmax and tumor-to-normal liver ratio (TNR). RESULTS: In healthy volunteers, (18)F-FACE was metabolically stable in vivo and its biodistribution was almost similar to blood pool, basically uniformly independent of age and gender during PET scan time (up to 3 h). Normal physiological uptake of (18)F-FACE at each organ including liver (SUVmean 1.8 ± 0.2) was lower than that of blood pool (SUVmean 2.3 ± 0.3) at 1 h after injection. Chronic inflammatory uptake around femur of post-operative state of femoral osteotomy and faint uptake of benign hemangioma were observed in a case of healthy volunteer. (18)F-FACE (SUVmax 2.7 ± 0.6, TNR 1.5 ± 0.4) of liver tumors was significantly lower than those of (18)F-FDG uptake (6.5 ± 4.2, 2.6 ± 1.7, respectively). In qualitative analysis, (18)F-FDG was positive in 4 tumors (3 HCCs, 1 CCC) and negative in the other 6 tumors, while (18)F-FACE was also positive in 4 tumors which were the same tumors with positive (18)F-FDG uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Biodistribution of (18)F-FACE was appropriate for oncologic imaging. Tumor (18)F-FACE uptake was positive in four patients with HCC and CCC, but the uptake pattern was similar to (18)F-FDG. Further evaluation was needed.


Assuntos
Fluoracetatos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagem , Colangiocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Feminino , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imagem Multimodal/métodos , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/métodos , Distribuição Tecidual , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Imagem Corporal Total/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA