RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Characterize factors raised in carotid endarterectomy litigation. METHODS: Outcomes, alleged causes of malpractice, and other factors were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 37 verdicts and settlements, defendants were not liable in 25 (67.5%) cases. Frequently reported complications included stroke (51.3%) and hypoglossal nerve injury (27.0%), with other complications including airway compromise, vocal cord injury, and death. No cases reported myocardial infarction. Cerebral monitoring was mentioned in 2 cases, while inadequate informed consent, delayed diagnosis, and requirement of additional surgery were alleged in numerous instances. Settlements and jury awards averaged US$895 833 and US$1.53 million, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Stroke and hypoglossal nerve injury are the most frequently litigated complications, and mean damages awarded were considerable. Knowledge of issues raised in our analysis may be included in a comprehensive consent process, potentially minimizing liability and improving patient safety.
Assuntos
Endarterectomia das Carótidas/efeitos adversos , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/legislação & jurisprudência , Responsabilidade Legal , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Compensação e Reparação , Diagnóstico Tardio/legislação & jurisprudência , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Responsabilidade Legal/economia , Masculino , Imperícia/economia , Erros Médicos/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Segurança do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Reoperação/legislação & jurisprudência , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: (1) Analyze otologic procedural malpractice litigation in the United States of America. (2) Discuss ways to prevent future malpractice litigation. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Case series with record review. METHODS: The study is a case series with review of court records pertaining to otologic procedures using the Westlaw legal database. The phrase medical malpractice was searched with terms related to otology and neurotology obtained from the AAO-HNS website. RESULTS: Of the 47 claims that met inclusion criteria, 63.8% were decided in the physician's favor, 25.5% were decided in the plaintiff's favor (average payment $446,697), and 10.6% were settled out of court (average payment $372,607). Cerumen removal was the most common procedure leading to complaint (21.3%) and the most likely procedure to lead to payment (50.0%). Hearing loss was the most common injury claimed among all cases (53.2%) and resulted in a high proportion of cases that led to payment (40.0%). Other common alleged injuries were facial nerve injury (27.7%), tympanic membrane perforation (23.4%), need for additional surgery (42.6%), and lack of informed consent (31.9%). In addition, cases resulting from acoustic neuroma or stapedectomy resulted in higher payments to the plaintiffs (average $3,498,597 and $2,733,000, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Malpractice trials were resolved in the defendant's favor in the majority of cases. Cerumen removal was the most common procedure leading to complaint and the procedure most likely to result in payment. Hearing loss was the most common injury cited. Payment was highest in acoustic neuroma and stapedectomy cases.
Assuntos
Imperícia , Otolaringologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otológicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Cerume , Humanos , Imperícia/economia , Imperícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neuroma Acústico/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otológicos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otológicos/economia , Cirurgia do Estribo/economia , Cirurgia do Estribo/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The potentially severe complications resulting from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak makes iatrogenic injury a medicolegal area of concern for otolaryngologists and neurosurgeons. The objectives of this analysis were to study legal outcomes as well as medical and nonmedical elements affecting malpractice litigation. METHODS: Public court records available in the Westlaw legal database (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY) were searched for medical malpractice litigation related to iatrogenic CSF leak. Of the 18 jury verdicts and settlements included, outcomes and awards, patient demographic data, and other factors instrumental in determining legal responsibility were recorded for comparison. RESULTS: Ten (55.6%) cases were resolved in the defendant's favor, 2 (11.1%) resulted in damages awarded by a jury, and 6 (33.3%) were settled out of court before resolution of trial. Mean damages awarded were $1.1 million, while out of court settlements averaged $966,887. Malpractice stemming from patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery comprised 77.8% of cases analyzed. The most frequent alleged factors cited for litigation included having to undergo additional surgery (88.9%), developing meningitis (50.0%), and failing to recognize complications in a timely manner (44.4%). Perceived deficits in informed consent were alleged in one-third of cases. CONCLUSION: Although a slight majority of cases were resolved in the defendant's favor, payments made were considerable, averaging approximately $1 million. Strategies to decrease liability and allow patients to make more informed decisions should include clear communication with patients that explicitly states potential risks, such as meningitis, and possible need to undergo additional reparative surgery.
Assuntos
Rinorreia de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/etiologia , Compensação e Reparação/legislação & jurisprudência , Endoscopia/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Otolaringologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano , Rinorreia de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/prevenção & controle , Endoscopia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica/prevenção & controle , Responsabilidade Legal/economia , Masculino , Imperícia/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: In this study, we detailed factors governing legal outcomes in iatrogenic orbital injury, with the purpose of discussing strategies to minimize liability and enhance patient safety. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. METHODS: Jury verdict and settlement reports were searched from publically available federal and state court records using the Westlaw database (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY). After exclusion of nonrelevant cases, 20 cases of iatrogenic orbital injuries were examined for factors such as legal outcome, damages awarded, defendant specialty, alleged causes of malpractice, and patient demographic information. RESULTS: The majority (60.0%) of cases were resolved in the defendant's favor. Payment was considerable for the cases decided in support of the plaintiff, averaging $1.13 million. Out-of-court settlements averaged $1.78 million (range, $487,500-$3.9 million), whereas jury-awarded damages averaged $472,661 (range, $75,000-$763,214). Complications stemming from endoscopic sinus surgery were most common (50.0%). Diplopia was the most common medical complaint (50.0%), whereas permanent deficits and having to undergo additional surgery were each present in 65.0% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The potential for permanent sequelae of iatrogenic orbital injury makes this complication susceptible to malpractice litigation. Otolaryngologists were the most common defendants. Although cases were resolved in the defendant's favor 60% of the time, payments made were considerable, averaging $1.13 million. Steps to minimize liability and improve patient safety include an informed consent process explicitly listing risks, including diplopia and blindness, and obtaining timely ophthalmology consultation when a complication is recognized.
Assuntos
Doença Iatrogênica/epidemiologia , Responsabilidade Legal , Imperícia/economia , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Órbita/lesões , Adulto , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica/economia , Incidência , Masculino , Imperícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Otolaringologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Seios Paranasais/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Medicolegal factors contribute to increasing healthcare costs through the direct costs of malpractice litigation, malpractice insurance premiums, and defensive medicine. Malpractice litigation trends are constantly changing as a result of technological innovations and changes in laws. In this study, we examine the most recent legal decisions related to Otolaryngology and characterize the factors responsible for determining legal responsibility. METHODS: The Westlaw legal database (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY) was used to search for jury verdicts since 2008 in Otolaryngology malpractice cases. The 44 cases included in this analysis were studied to determine the procedures most commonly litigated and progressing to trial, as well as the year, location, alleged cause of malpractice, specialty of co-defendants, and case outcomes. RESULTS: Out of the 44 cases included in this analysis, physicians were not found liable in 36 (81.8%) cases. Rhinologic procedures comprised 38.6% of cases litigated, and rulings were in physicians' favor in 66.7% of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) cases and all non-ESS rhinologic cases. A perceived lack of informed consent was noted in 34.1% of cases. The 8 jury awards averaged $940,000 (range, $148,000-$3,600,000). CONCLUSION: Otolaryngologists were not found liable in the majority of cases reviewed. Rhinologic surgeries were the most common procedures resulting in litigation. Adenotonsillectomies, thyroidectomies, and airway management are also well-represented. Perceived deficits in informed consent and misdiagnosis were noted in a considerable proportion of otolaryngologic malpractice cases resulting in jury decisions.