Ultrafast Gene Fusion Assessment for Nonsquamous NSCLC.

Introduction: Gene fusion testing of ALK, ROS1, RET, NTRK, and MET exon 14 skipping mutations is guideline recommended in nonsquamous NSCLC (NS-NSCLC). Nevertheless, assessment is often hindered by the limited availability of tissue and prolonged next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing, which can protract the initiation of a targeted therapy. Therefore, the development of faster gene fusion assessment is critical for optimal clinical decision-making. Here, we compared two ultrafast gene fusion assays (UFGFAs) using NGS (Genexus, Oncomine Precision Assay, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a multiplex reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (Idylla, GeneFusion Assay, Biocartis) approach at diagnosis in a retrospective series of 195 NS-NSCLC cases and five extrapulmonary tumors with a known NTRK fusion. Methods: A total of 195 NS-NSCLC cases (113 known gene fusions and 82 wild-type tumors) were included retrospectively. To validate the detection of a NTRK fusion, we added five NTRK-positive extrathoracic tumors. The diagnostic performance of the two UFGFAs and standard procedures was compared. Results: The accuracy was 92.3% and 93.1% for Idylla and Genexus, respectively. Both systems improved the sensitivity for detection by including a 5'-3' imbalance analysis. Although detection of ROS1, MET exon 14 skipping, and RET was excellent with both systems, ALK fusion detection was reduced with sensitivities of 87% and 88%, respectively. Idylla had a limited sensitivity of 67% for NTRK fusions, in which only an imbalance assessment was used. Conclusions: UFGFA using NGS and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction approaches had an equal level of detection of gene fusion but with some technique-specific limitations. Nevertheless, UFGFA detection in routine clinical care is feasible with both systems allowing faster initiation of therapy and a broad degree of screening.

Assessment of Treatment Effects and Long-term Benefits in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Trials Using the Flexible Parametric Cure Model: A Systematic Review.

Importance: Compared with standard cytotoxic therapies, randomized immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) phase 3 trials reveal delayed benefits in terms of patient survival and/or long-term response. Such outcomes generally violate the assumption of proportional hazards, and the classical Cox proportional hazards regression model is therefore unsuitable for these types of analyses. Objective: To evaluate the ability of the flexible parametric cure model (FPCM) to estimate treatment effects and long-term responder fractions (LRFs) independently of prespecified time points. Evidence Review: This systematic review used reconstructed individual patient data from ICI advanced or metastatic melanoma and lung cancer phase 3 trials extracted from the literature. Trials published between January 1, 2010, and October 1, 2019, with long-term follow-up periods (maximum follow-up, ≥36 months in first line and ≥30 months otherwise) were selected to identify LRFs. Individual patient data for progression-free survival were reconstructed from the published randomized ICI phase 3 trial results. The FPCM was applied to estimate treatment effects on the overall population and on the following components of the population: LRF and progression-free survival in non-long-term responders. Results obtained were compared with treatment effects estimated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Findings: In this systematic review, among the 23 comparisons studied using the FPCM, a statistically significant association between the time-to-event component and experimental treatment was observed in the main analyses and confirmed in the sensitivity analyses of 18 comparisons. Results were discordant for 4 comparisons that were not significant by the Cox proportional hazards regression model. The LRFs varied from 1.5% to 12.7% for the control arms and from 4.6% to 38.8% for the experimental arms. Differences in LRFs varied from 2% to 29% and were significantly increased in the experimental compared with the control arms, except for 4 comparisons. Conclusions and Relevance: This systematic review of reconstructed individual patient data found that the FPCM was a complementary approach that provided a comprehensive and pertinent evaluation of benefit and risk by assessing whether ICI treatment was associated with an increased probability of patients being long-term responders or with an improved progression-free survival in patients who were not long-term responders.

Assessment of nivolumab in HIV-Infected patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer after prior chemotherapy. The IFCT-1602 CHIVA2 phase 2 clinical trial.

IMPORTANCE: Therapies targeting immune checkpoints, such as the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor, have become the standard-of-care for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but people living with HIV (PLWH) were excluded from these studies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of nivolumab in PLWH with advanced NSCLC. DESIGN: The CHIVA2 study was a nonrandomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial in PLWH with previously treated advanced NSCLC. SETTING: National multicenter prospective study. PARTICIPANTS: patients had viral load of <200 copies/mL, regardless of their CD4+ T-cell count. INTERVENTION: Nivolumab was administered in second or third line, as monotherapy intravenously at 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, until disease progression or limiting toxicity. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary endpoint was disease control rate, evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Adverse events were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. RESULTS: Sixteen patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled: 14 (88 %) were men, median age was 58 years (range: 44-71), and all were smokers. The median duration of nivolumab treatment was 3.5 months (range: 0.5-26.5). The median follow-up was 23.6 months. Disease control rate was 62.5 % for 15 evaluable patients at 8 weeks (2 with partial response, 8 with stable disease, and 5 with disease progression). Twelve (75 %) patients had treatment-related adverse events, which were mild or moderate, except for one patient experiencing severe pruritus, onycholysis, and pemphigoid. There were no opportunistic infections or unexpected immune-related events. HIV viral load was stable during treatment. An increase in proliferating CD8+ and CD4+ T-cells was observed after 3 nivolumab cycles in a subgroup of 9 patients. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Second/third-line nivolumab treatment was well-tolerated and beneficial in PLWH with NSCLC. Future trials should investigate immune checkpoint inhibitors in first-line settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT.ema.europa.eu registration number: 2016-003796-22.

Supporting Clinical Decision-Making during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic through a Global Research Commitment: The TERAVOLT Experience.

To understand the real impact of COVID-19 on cancer patients, an entirely new data collection effort was initiated within the Thoracic Cancers International COVID-19 Collaboration (TERAVOLT). TERAVOLT reported high mortality related to COVID-19 infection in thoracic cancer patients and identified several negative prognostic factors. In this commentary, we discuss the importance and limits of patient registries to support decision-making in thoracic cancer during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Cost-effectiveness of KRAS, EGFR and ALK testing for decision making in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: the French IFCT-PREDICT.amm study.

ALK rearrangement and EGFR/KRAS mutations constitute the primary biomarkers tested to provide targeted or nontargeted therapies in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Our objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of biomarker testing for NSCLC.Between 2013 and 2014, 843 treatment-naive patients were prospectively recruited at 19 French hospitals into a longitudinal observational cohort study. Two testing strategies were compared, i.e. with "at least one biomarker status known" and "at least KRAS status known", in addition to "no biomarker testing" as the reference strategy. The Kaplan-Meier approach was employed to assess restricted mean survival time. Direct medical costs incurred by hospitals were estimated with regard to treatment, inpatient care and biomarker testing.Compared with "no biomarker testing", the "at least one biomarker status known" strategy yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR13 230 per life-year saved, which decreased to EUR7444 per life-year saved with the "at least KRAS status known" testing strategy. In sensitivity analyses, biomarker testing strategies were less costly and more effective in 41% of iterations.In summary, molecular testing prior to treatment initiation proves to be cost-effective in advanced NSCLC management and may assist decision makers in defining conditions for further implementation of these innovations in general practice.