Long-term costs and cost-effectiveness of adjunctive corticosteroids for patients with septic shock in New Zealand.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine whether adjunctive hydrocortisone reduced healthcare expenditure and was cost-effective compared with placebo in New Zealand patients in the Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock (ADRENAL) trial. DESIGN: This is a health economic analysis using data linkage to New Zealand Ministry of Health databases to determine resource use, costs, and cost-effectiveness for a 24-month period. SETTING: The study was conducted in New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION: Patients with septic shock were randomised to receive a 7-day continuous infusion of 200 mg of hydrocortisone or placebo in the ADRENAL trial. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Healthcare expenditure was associated with all hospital admissions, emergency department presentations, outpatient visits, and pharmacy expenditure. Effectiveness outcomes included mortality at 6 months and 24 months and quality of life at 6 months. Cost-effectiveness outcomes were assessed with reference to quality-adjusted life years gained at 6 months and life years gained at 24 months. RESULTS: Of 3800 patients in the ADRENAL trial, 419 (11.0%) were eligible, and 405 (96.7% of those eligible) were included. The mean total costs per patient over 24 months were $143,627 ± 100,890 and $143,772 ± 97,117 for the hydrocortisone and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.99). Intensive care unit costs for the index admission were $50,492 and $62,288 per patient for the hydrocortisone and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.09). The mean number of quality-adjusted life years gained at 6 months and mean number of life years gained at 24 months was not significantly different by treatment group, and the probability of hydrocortisone being cost-effective was 55% at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: In New Zealand, adjunctive hydrocortisone did not reduce total healthcare expenditure or improve outcomes compared with placebo in patients with septic shock.

The intensivist's assessment of gastrointestinal function: A pilot study.

Gastrointestinal dysfunction/failure (GDF) is a common cause of concern in critically ill patients. Although the gut plays an important role in the genesis of organ failure, its exclusion from organ severity scoring systems has made it challenging for intensivists to score it sufficiently at the bedside. We aimed to survey intensive care specialists about their perceptions, attitudes, and approaches towards the assessment of the gut in Australia and New Zealand intensive care units (ICUs). An electronic (online) questionnaire was used to survey intensive care specialists from the Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS). The survey comprised 10 questions focused on four key areas: (i) the extent of the problem with GDF in ICUs, (ii) the use and reliability of the current gut scoring tools, (iii) personal approaches and practices associated with GDF assessment, and (4) potential value of a novel GDF scoring system and its incorporation into an organ severity score. Our results showed that GDF was a significant concern amongst ICUs in Australia and New Zealand intensivists (84%; 66/79), with a small number of participants (14%; 3/79) using a gut scoring tool in their ICUs. Despite this, we have no established objective scoring tool for its assessment. The survey highlighted the need for developing a novel scoring tool to assess the gut was considered important amongst majority of the intensivists (92%; 72/78), which would prove useful in clinical practice and potentially lead to incorporation into an organ severity score in the future.

Measured energy expenditure in mildly hypothermic critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury: A sub-study of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Prophylactic hypothermia, often used in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury, reduces energy expenditure and may affect energy delivered by nutrition therapy. The primary objective of this study was to measure energy expenditure in hypothermic patients over the first 3 days after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Secondary objectives included comparison of measured energy expenditure and nutrition delivery to day 7. METHODS: A prospective sub-study of a randomized controlled trial conducted in patients with severe TBI, investigating prophylactic hypothermia (33-35 °C) as a neuroprotective therapy. In two centers, indirect calorimetry was initiated within 24 h of randomization and repeated up to twice daily to day 7. Data are presented as n (%), mean (standard deviation (SD)), median [interquartile range (IQR)], and mean difference (95% confidence interval (CI)). RESULTS: Forty patients were included (20 in each group), with 17 patients in the hypothermic and 16 in the normothermic group having an indirect calorimetry measurement in the first 3 days. Over the first 3 days, the mean temperature in the hypothermic and normothermic groups was 33.5 (0.6) ºC (n = 17) and 37 (0.5) ºC (n = 16), p < 0.0001, and the mean measured energy expenditure, was 21 (5) and 27 (4) kcal/kg, p = 0.002, representing a mean difference of 5 (95% CI: 2-8) kcal/kg. Energy expenditure was 20% (95% CI: 9.5-29%) less in hypothermia patients compared to normothermia patients. Hypothermia patients also had higher gastric residual volumes across the 7 day study period (438 (237) mls vs 184 (103) mls, p < 0.0001) and higher use of metoclopramide and erythromycin as prokinetics. Despite enteral nutrition intolerance, hypothermia patients received 93% of measured energy expenditure over 7 days. CONCLUSION: In TBI patients, energy expenditure was 20% less when receiving prophylactic hypothermia compared to normothermia. Greater gastric residual volumes, use of prokinetics and energy delivery that approximated measured energy expenditure was also observed in hypothermia patients. TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: POLAR-RCT: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00987688; Anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12609000764235. This sub-study was not registered separately.

The health and economic burden of respiratory syncytial virus associated hospitalizations in adults.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is increasingly recognized as an important cause of illness in adults; however, data on RSV disease and economic burden in this age group remain limited. We aimed to provide comprehensive estimates of RSV disease burden among adults aged ≥18 years. METHODS: During 2012-2015, population-based, active surveillance of acute respiratory infection (ARI) hospitalizations enabled estimation of the seasonal incidence of RSV hospitalizations and direct health costs in adults aged ≥18 years in Auckland, New Zealand. RESULTS: Of 4,600 ARI hospitalizations tested for RSV, 348 (7.6%) were RSV positive. The median (interquartile range) length of hospital stay for RSV positive patients was 4 (2-6) days. The seasonal incidence rate (IR) of RSV hospitalizations, corrected for non-testing, was 23.6 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 21.0-26.1) per 100,000 adults aged ≥18 years. Hospitalization risk increased with age with the highest incidence among adults aged ≥80 years (IR 190.8 per 100,000, 95% CI 137.6-244.0). Being of Maori or Pacific ethnicity or living in a neighborhood with low socioeconomic status (SES) were independently associated with increased RSV hospitalization rates. We estimate RSV-associated hospitalizations among adults aged ≥18 years to cost on average NZD $4,758 per event. CONCLUSIONS: RSV infection is associated with considerable disease and economic cost in adults. RSV disproportionally affects adult sub-groups defined by age, ethnicity, and neighborhood SES. An effective RSV vaccine or RSV treatment may offer benefits for older adults.

Cost-Effectiveness of Erythropoietin in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multinational Trial-Based Economic Analysis.

The EPO-TBI multi-national randomized controlled trial found that erythropoietin (EPO), when compared to placebo, did not affect 6-month neurological outcome, but reduced illness severity-adjusted mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), making the cost-effectiveness of EPO in TBI uncertain. The current study uses patient-level data from the EPO-TBI trial to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of EPO in patients with moderate or severe TBI from the healthcare payers' perspective. We addressed the issue of transferability in multi-national trials by estimating costs and effects for specific geographical regions of the study (Australia/New Zealand, Europe, and Saudi Arabia). Unadjusted mean quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs; 95% confidence interval [CI]) at 6 months were 0.027 (0.020-0.034; p < 0.001) higher in the EPO group, with an adjusted QALY increment of 0.014 (0.000-0.028; p = 0.04). Mean unadjusted costs (95% CI) were $US5668 (-9191 to -2144; p = 0.002) lower in the treatment group; controlling for baseline IMPACT-TBI score and regional heterogeneity reduced this difference to $2377 (-12,446 to 7693; p = 0.64). For a willingness-to-pay threshold of $US50,000 per QALY, 71.8% of replications were considered cost-effective. Therefore, we did not find evidence that EPO was significantly cost-effective in the treatment of moderate or severe TBI at 6-month follow-up.

Early detection of severe maternal morbidity: a retrospective assessment of the role of an Early Warning Score System.

BACKGROUND: The Early Warning Scoring (EWS) surveillance system is used to identify deteriorating patients and enable appropriate staff to be called promptly. However, there is a lack of evidence that EWS surveillance systems lead to a reduction in severe morbidity. AIMS: To determine whether as EWS may have improved the detection of severe maternal morbidity or lessened the severity of illness among women with severe morbidity at a large tertiary maternity unit at Auckland City Hospital (ACH), New Zealand. METHODS: Admissions to intensive care, cardiothoracic and vascular intensive care, or an obstetric high-dependency unit (HDU) were identified from clinical and hospital administrative databases. Case reviews and transcribed observation charts were presented to a multidisciplinary review group who, through group consensus, determined whether an EWS might have hastened recognition and/or escalation and effective treatment. RESULTS: The multidisciplinary review team determined that an EWS might have reduced the seriousness of maternal morbidity in five cases (7.6%), including three admissions for obstetric sepsis to intensive care unit and two to obstetric HDU for post-partum haemorrhage. No patient had a complete set of respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure and temperature recordings at every time period. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have been used to support introduction of an EWS to the maternity unit at ACH.

Epidemiologic and virologic assessment of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic on selected temperate countries in the Southern Hemisphere: Argentina, Australia, Chile, New Zealand and South Africa.

UNLABELLED: INTRODUCTION AND SETTING: Our analysis compares the most comprehensive epidemiologic and virologic surveillance data compiled to date for laboratory-confirmed H1N1pdm patients between 1 April 2009 - 31 January 2010 from five temperate countries in the Southern Hemisphere-Argentina, Australia, Chile, New Zealand, and South Africa. OBJECTIVE: We evaluate transmission dynamics, indicators of severity, and describe the co-circulation of H1N1pdm with seasonal influenza viruses. RESULTS: In the five countries, H1N1pdm became the predominant influenza strain within weeks of initial detection. South Africa was unique, first experiencing a seasonal H3N2 wave, followed by a distinct H1N1pdm wave. Compared with the 2007 and 2008 influenza seasons, the peak of influenza-like illness (ILI) activity in four of the five countries was 3-6 times higher with peak ILI consultation rates ranging from 35/1,000 consultations/week in Australia to 275/100,000 population/week in New Zealand. Transmission was similar in all countries with the reproductive rate ranging from 1.2-1.6. The median age of patients in all countries increased with increasing severity of disease, 4-14% of all hospitalized cases required critical care, and 26-68% of fatal patients were reported to have ≥1 chronic medical condition. Compared with seasonal influenza, there was a notable downward shift in age among severe cases with the highest population-based hospitalization rates among children <5 years old. National population-based mortality rates ranged from 0.8-1.5/100,000. CONCLUSIONS: The difficulty experienced in tracking the progress of the pandemic globally, estimating its severity early on, and comparing information across countries argues for improved routine surveillance and standardization of investigative approaches and data reporting methods.

Cost of medical injury in New Zealand: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost of treating medical injury associated with hospital admissions in New Zealand and the patient characteristics of costly adverse events. METHODS: As part of the New Zealand Quality in Healthcare Study (NZQHS), a retrospective examination of medical records in 13 public hospitals identified the occurrence of clinical procedures and hospital bed days attributable to adverse events. The prices charged to foreign patients were used to estimate the cost of the health care resources used. RESULTS: 850 adverse events were identified in the NZQHS which cost an average of $NZ 10,264 per patient. For New Zealand, adverse events are estimated to cost the medical system $NZ 870 million, of which $NZ 590 million went toward treating preventable adverse events. The results suggest that up to 30% of public hospital expenditure goes toward treating an adverse event. The results also suggest that older patients, neonates and those with moderately serious co-morbidity tended to have more costly adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events lead to a significant use of health care resources in New Zealand. These findings suggest that substantial resources could be saved by eliminating preventable adverse events.