Utility and validity of dynamic chest radiography in cystic fibrosis (dynamic CF): an observational, non-controlled, non-randomised, single-centre, prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Dynamic chest radiography (DCR) uses novel, low-dose radiographic technology to capture images of the thoracic cavity while in motion. Pulmonary function testing is important in cystic fibrosis (CF). The tolerability, rapid acquisition and lower radiation and cost compared with CT imaging may make DCR a useful adjunct to current standards of care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an observational, non-controlled, non-randomised, single-centre, prospective study. This study is conducted at the Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital (LHCH) adult CF unit. Participants are adults with CF. This study reviews DCR taken during routine CF Annual Review (n=150), validates DCR-derived lung volumes against whole body plethysmography (n=20) and examines DCR at the start and end of pulmonary exacerbations of CF (n=20). The primary objectives of this study are to examine if DCR provides lung function information that correlates with PFT, and lung volumes that correlate whole body plethysmography. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received the following approvals: HRA REC (11 December 2019) and LHCH R&I (11 October 2019). Results are made available to people with CF, the funders and other researchers. Processed, anonymised data are available from the research team on request. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 64994816.

Risk assessment of pneumothorax and pulmonary haemorrhage complicating percutaneous co-axial cutting needle lung biopsy.

INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of radiologists to accurately estimate pneumothorax and pulmonary haemorrhage during percutaneous co-axial cutting needle CT-guided lung biopsy. METHODOLOGY: Patients undergoing cutting needle lung biopsy during the study period were identified; the path taken by the cutting needle marked on each pre-biopsy staging CT scan. Each scan was then reviewed independently by two thoracic radiologists blinded to clinical details and complications; pneumothorax and pulmonary haemorrhage risk estimated with a percentage Visual Analogue Scale. RESULTS: In 134 patients, pneumothorax occurred in 24%. The radiologists differed in the estimation of pneumothorax risk in 55% (74 episodes). When pneumothorax risk was estimated <20% by radiologists 1 and 2, 16% and 14% of biopsies resulted in pneumothorax; where risk was estimated at 20-49%, pneumothorax incidence rose to 33% and 31%; where risk was deemed > or =50%, pneumothorax rate was 87% and 100%. Pulmonary haemorrhage occurred in 4%; estimated haemorrhage risk for biopsies complicated by haemorrhage did not differ significantly from where haemorrhage did not occur. CONCLUSION: Radiologists differ markedly in the estimation of pneumothorax risk for a patient undergoing co-axial lung biopsy. Identifying individual patients developing pneumothorax was only possible when risk was estimated at > or =50%. Pulmonary haemorrhage was uncommon and difficult to predict accurately.