A survey of United States obstetric anesthesiologists' perceived value of obstetric anesthesiology fellowship.

INTRODUCTION: Subspecialty training in obstetric anesthesiology is associated with improved patient outcomes and reduced anesthesia-related morbidity and mortality. Despite this, the demand for fellowship-trained obstetric anesthesiologists far exceeds the supply. This survey study aimed to evaluate the perceived value of obstetric anesthesiology subspecialty training on career trajectory, job satisfaction, quality of life, and job autonomy. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, we conducted a cross-sectional study of fellowship-trained obstetric anesthesiologists in the United States of America. In March and April 2022, program directors of obstetric anesthesiology fellowships distributed an electronic survey link containing 29 multiple-choice questions to their program alumni. Survey content included respondent demographic characteristics, practice models, career information, and perceived value of an obstetric anesthesiology fellowship. RESULTS: We surveyed 217/502 (43%) fellowship-trained obstetric anesthesiologists with a response rate of 158/217 (73%). Most worked in urban, academic, and level IV perinatal health centers. The majority believed an obstetric anesthesiology fellowship was "extremely beneficial" (77%), enhanced quality of life (84%), improved the quality of patient care (99%), and was influential in helping obtain their first post-training job (86%). The perceived value of the fellowship included an enhanced career trajectory, a sense of purpose, improved job satisfaction, a sense of work community, lower burnout, involvement in maternal health initiatives, increased mentorship, and departmental leadership. CONCLUSION: In this survey study, fellowship-trained obstetric anesthesiologists perceived a positive impact of fellowship training on career trajectory, job protection and autonomy, quality of life, and job satisfaction. This information may be meaningful to trainees considering pursuing a fellowship and a career in obstetric anesthesiology.

The Berlin Questionnaire for assessment of sleep disordered breathing risk in parturients and non-pregnant women.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy is associated with alteration in sleep patterns and quality. We wished to investigate whether pregnant women have a higher likelihood of a positive Berlin Questionnaire than non-pregnant women. METHODS: Pregnant women ages 18-45 years (n=4074) presenting for delivery, and non-pregnant women ages 18-45 years (n=490) presenting for outpatient surgery provided demographic information and completed the Berlin Questionnaire evaluating self-reported snoring and daytime sleepiness. For the pregnant patients, the infant's birth weight and Apgar scores were also recorded. RESULTS: Of the 1439 patients with a positive Berlin Questionnaire, 96 were in the non-pregnant control population versus 1343 in the pregnant population (20% vs. 33%, respectively, P<0.001; odds ratio 2.0 [95% CI: 1.6-2.5]). There was a positive correlation between infant weight and a positive Berlin Questionnaire. The incidence of preeclampsia was greater (odds ratio 3.9) in the pregnant patients with a positive Berlin Questionnaire as compared with the parturients with a negative Berlin Questionnaire (odds ratio 1.1). CONCLUSION: Parturients are more likely to have a positive Berlin Questionnaire than non-pregnant women. This may indicate an increased likelihood of sleep disordered breathing.

The role of pedometers in the assessment of intermittent claudication.

OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the role of pedometers in the assessment of patients with intermittent claudication by comparing them with treadmill testing, post-exercise ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) and physical function questionnaires. PATIENTS AND METHODS: fifty patients with intermittent claudication were prospectively assessed by treadmill examination measuring maximum walking distance (MWD) and post-exercise ABPI. Three physical function questionnaires: (1) Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 (MOS SF-36), Physical Function (PF). (2) MOS SF-36 Role limitation due to Physical Problems (RP). (3) Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) were completed. Pedometers were used for one week and the daily average number of steps taken by each patient recorded. Pedometers scores were compared with MWD, post-exercise ABPI and physical function questionnaires scores using Spearman correlation test. RESULTS: pedometers estimation of daily physical activity moderately correlated with MWD (Rho=0.35, p=0.01), post-exercise ABPI (Rho=0.35, p=0.01), MOS-SF 36 PF (Rho=0.31, p=0.02), MOS-SF RP (Rho=0.28, p=0.05) and with WIQ (Rho=0.42, p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: they moderately correlate with treadmill testing, post-exercise ABPI, and with physical function questionnaires. Pedometers may provide a simple and cheap alternative for the assessment of physical and functional disability in intermittent claudication.

Preoperative airway assessment: predictive value of a multivariate risk index.

Using readily available and objective airway risk criteria, a multivariate model for stratifying risk of difficult endotracheal intubation was developed and its accuracy compared to currently applied clinical methods. We studied 10,507 consecutive patients who were prospectively assessed prior to general anesthesia with respect to mouth opening, thyromental distance, oropharyngeal (Mallampati) classification, neck movement, ability to prognath, body weight, and history of difficult tracheal intubation. After induction of anesthesia, the laryngeal view during rigid laryngoscopy was graded and the ability of experienced anesthesia personnel to ventilate via a mask was determined. Poor intubating conditions (laryngoscopy Grade IV) and inability to achieve adequate mask ventilation were identified in 107 (1%) and 8 (0.07%) cases, respectively. Logistic regression identified all seven criteria as independent predictors of difficulty with laryngoscopic visualization. A composite airway risk index (derived from nominalized odds ratios calculated from the multivariate model) as well a simplified (0 = low, 1 = medium, 2 = high) risk weighting exhibited higher positive predictive value for laryngoscopy Grade IV at scores with similar sensitivity to Mallampati class III, as well as higher sensitivity at scores with similar positive predictive value. Compared to Mallampati class I fewer false-negative predictions were observed at a risk index value of 0. We conclude that improved risk stratification for difficulty with visualization during rigid laryngoscopy (Grade IV) can be obtained by use of a simplified preoperative multivariate airway risk index, with better accuracy compared to oropharyngeal (Mallampati) classification at both low- and high-risk levels.

Morbidity and duration of ICU stay after cardiac surgery. A model for preoperative risk assessment.

Although risk factors for mortality after cardiac surgery have been identified, there is no widely applicable method for readily determining risk of postoperative morbidity based on preoperative severity of illness. The goal of this study was to develop a model for stratifying the risk of serious morbidity after adult cardiac surgery using readily available and objective clinical data. After univariate analysis of risk factors in 3,156 operations, 11 variables were identified as important predictors by logistic regression (LR) analysis and used to construct an additive model to calculate the probability of serious morbidity. Reliable correlation was found between a simplified additive model for clinical use and the LR model. The clinical and logistic models were then tested prospectively in 394 patients and demonstrated a pattern of increasing morbidity with ascending scores similar to that predicted by the reference group. Increasing clinical risk score was also associated with a greater frequency of individual complications as well as prolongation of ICU stay. This study demonstrates that it is feasible to design a simple method to stratify the risk of serious morbidity after adult cardiac surgery. With further prospective multicenter refinement and testing, such a model is likely to be useful for adjusting severity of illness when reporting outcome statistics as well as planning resource utilization.

The Hopkins Competency Assessment Test: a brief method for evaluating patients' capacity to give informed consent.

The Hopkins Competency Assessment Test (HCAT), a brief instrument for evaluating the competency of patients to give informed consent or write advance directives, consists of a short essay and a questionnaire for determining patients' understanding of the essay. In a study to validate the instrument, 41 medical and psychiatric inpatients answered the questionnaire after reading the essay while bearing it read aloud. A forensic psychiatrist who was blind to the HCAT scores later examined the patients for competency. A subject's number of correct answers to the HCAT questionnaire was an accurate indicator of clinical competency as assessed by the psychiatrist. The results suggest that the HCAT is a useful tool for rapidly screening patients for competency to make treatment decisions.