Assessment of Maraviroc Exposure-Response Relationship at 48 Weeks in Treatment-Experienced HIV-1-Infected Patients in the MOTIVATE Studies.

Efficacy exposure-response relationships of the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc were evaluated across two phase III clinical trials. This post-hoc analysis used 48-week efficacy data from 841 treatment-experienced patients infected with CCR5-tropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), identified by the enhanced sensitivity Trofile assay. Probability of treatment success (viral RNA <50 copies/ml) was modeled using generalized additive logistic regression, testing exposure, clinical, and virologic variables. Prognostic factors for treatment success (in decreasing order of Akaike information criterion (AIC) change) were: maraviroc treatment, high-weighted overall susceptibility to background treatment, absence of an undetectable maraviroc concentration, high baseline CD4 count (BCD4), low viral load (VL), race (other than black), absence of non-R5 baseline tropism (BTRP), and absence of fosamprenavir (FPV). No concentration-response relationship was found with treatment (maraviroc vs. placebo) and presence/absence of undetectable maraviroc concentration (adherence marker) in the model. The maraviroc doses studied (300 or 150 mg with potent CYP3A4 inhibitors once (q.d.)/twice daily (b.i.d.)) deliver concentrations near the top of the concentration-response curve.CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology (2013) 2, e64; doi:10.1038/psp.2013.42; published online 14 August 2013.

Counting the costs: comparing depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and norethisterone oenanthate utilisation patterns in South Africa.

BACKGROUND: In South Africa, where health care resources are limited, it is important to ensure that drugs provision and use is rational. The Essential Drug List includes depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and norethisterone oenanthate (NET-EN) as injectable progestagen-only contraceptives (IPCs), and both products are extensively used. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: Utilisation patterns of the injectable contraceptive products DMPA and NET-EN are compared in the context of current knowledge of the safety and efficacy of these agents. Utilisation patterns were analysed by means of a Pareto (ABC) analysis of IPCs issued from 4 South African provincial pharmaceutical depots over 3 financial years. A case study from rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, is used to examine utilisation patterns and self-reported side effects experienced by 187 women using IPCs. RESULTS: IPCs accounted for a substantial share of total state expenditure on drugs. While more DMPA than NET-EN was issued, NET-EN distribution from 2 depots increased over the 3-year period. Since DMPA was cheaper, if all NET-EN clients in the 1999/2000 financial year (annualised) had used DMPA, the 4 depots could have saved 4.95 million South African Rands on product acquisition costs alone. The KZN case study showed slightly more NET-EN (54%) than DMPA (46%) use; no significant differences in self-reported side effects; and that younger women were more likely to use NET-EN than DMPA (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Providing IPCs on the basis of age is not appropriate or cost effective. Rational use of these products should include consideration of the cost of prescribing one over another.

Earlier discharge with community-based intervention for low birth weight infants: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged hospitalization of low birth weight infants increases the risk of medical and psychosocial complications. The feasibility of earlier discharge with community-based follow-up of infants of < or = 2000 g birth weight, without the use of home apnea monitors, was investigated. METHODS: One hundred infants of < or = 2000 g birth weight were randomized to either an intervention or control group. Intervention infants were discharged when readiness criteria were met. Based on assessed need, intervention group families received public health nursing and homemaker services for up to 8 weeks. Control infants were discharged to their homes at the discretion of the attending physician. All infants were assessed blindly at age 1 year with the Bayley and Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) scales. RESULTS: There were no group differences in baseline infants' characteristics or in neonatal complications. Infants in the intervention group were discharged from the hospital at an earlier postconceptional age (mean +/- SD 36.6 +/- 1.5 weeks vs 37.3 +/- 1.6 weeks; P < .04). Median length of hospital stay (23 days vs 31.5 days) and mean weight at the time of discharge (2200 +/- 288 g vs 2275 +/- 301 g) were lower, but not significantly, for infants in the intervention group. A secondary analysis by birth weight strata (< or = 1500 g and 1501 through 2000 g) revealed that the most significant reductions in hospital stay and weight at discharge were realized in infants of 1501 through 2000 g birth weight. The persistence of apneic episodes and need for electronic monitoring prevented earlier discharge of infants of < or = 1500 g birth weight. Postdischarge services to the intervention group included 185 public health nurse home visits (3.8 +/- 0.91), 410 phone contacts (8.4 +/- 5), and 2298 homemaker hours (46 +/- 78) of service. At 1 year, there were no deaths and no group differences in rehospitalization rates, use of ambulatory services, or Bayley scores. Intervention families had significantly higher 1-year HOME scores. Minimum cost of hospital care was $873 per day, while the total cost of community-based services averaged $626 per infant. CONCLUSIONS: A significant reduction in average length of hospital stay was achieved for infants of 1501 through 2000 g birth weight. Earlier discharge of infants weighing < or = 1500 g at birth was hampered by persistent apneic episodes and feeding difficulties. A community-based program designed to provide individualized support and education for families of low birth weight infants was cost-effective and had a positive influence on the home environment.