Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 8(2): e55012, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23390509

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite a broad consensus that communities should be actively involved in improving their own health, evidence for the effect of community participation on specific health outcomes is limited. We examine the effectiveness of community participation interventions in maternal and newborn health, asking: did participation improve outcomes? We also look at how the impact of community participation has been assessed, particularly through randomised controlled trials, and make recommendations for future research. We highlight the importance of qualitative investigation, suggesting key areas for qualitative data reporting alongside quantitative work. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Systematic review of published and 'grey' literature from 1990. We searched 11 databases, and followed up secondary references. Main outcome measures were the use of skilled care before/during/after birth and maternal/newborn mortality/morbidity. We included qualitative and quantitative studies from any country, and used a community participation theoretical framework to analyse the data. We found 10 interventions. Community participation had largely positive impacts on maternal/newborn health as part of a package of interventions, although not necessarily on uptake of skilled care. Interventions improving mortality or use of skilled care raised awareness, encouraged dialogue and involved communities in designing solutions-but so did those showing no effect. DISCUSSION: There are few high-quality, quantitative studies. We also lack information about why participation interventions do/do not succeed - an area of obvious interest for programme designers. Qualitative investigation can help fill this information gap and should be at the heart of future quantitative research examining participation interventions - in maternal/newborn health, and more widely. This review illustrates the need for qualitative investigation alongside RCTs and other quantitative studies to understand complex interventions in context, describe predicted and unforeseen impacts, assess potential for generalisability, and capture the less easily measurable social/political effects of encouraging participation.


Assuntos
Participação da Comunidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Bem-Estar do Lactente/estatística & dados numéricos , Bem-Estar Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Bases de Dados Bibliográficas , Feminino , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Projetos de Pesquisa
2.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 32(3): 427-30, 2010 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20335184

RESUMO

The Coroners and Justice Act (2009) represents the latest in a long series of legislative and policy measures aimed at reforming the coroner system. Unfortunately, the Act represents a continued failure to recognize that the legal orientation of the coroner system threatens its capability to contribute to adequate cause-specific disease surveillance and, in doing so, to fulfil its proper role in a public health system.


Assuntos
Médicos Legistas/legislação & jurisprudência , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde , Saúde Pública , Inglaterra , Humanos , País de Gales
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA