Registry-based trials: a potential model for cost savings?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Registry-based trials have emerged as a potentially cost-saving study methodology. Early estimates of cost savings, however, conflated the benefits associated with registry utilisation and those associated with other aspects of pragmatic trial designs, which might not all be as broadly applicable. In this study, we sought to build a practical tool that investigators could use across disciplines to estimate the ranges of potential cost differences associated with implementing registry-based trials versus standard clinical trials. METHODS: We built simulation Markov models to compare unique costs associated with data acquisition, cleaning, and linkage under a registry-based trial design versus a standard clinical trial. We conducted one-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, varying study characteristics over broad ranges, to determine thresholds at which investigators might optimally select each trial design. RESULTS: Registry-based trials were more cost effective than standard clinical trials 98.6% of the time. Data-related cost savings ranged from $4300 to $600,000 with variation in study characteristics. Cost differences were most reactive to the number of patients in a study, the number of data elements per patient available in a registry, and the speed with which research coordinators could manually abstract data. Registry incorporation resulted in cost savings when as few as 3768 independent data elements were available and when manual data abstraction took as little as 3.4 seconds per data field. CONCLUSIONS: Registries offer important resources for investigators. When available, their broad incorporation may help the scientific community reduce the costs of clinical investigation. We offer here a practical tool for investigators to assess potential costs savings.

Hospital Costs Related to Early Extubation After Infant Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The Pediatric Heart Network Collaborative Learning Study (PHN CLS) increased early extubation rates after infant tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) and coarctation of the aorta (CoA) repair across participating sites by implementing a clinical practice guideline (CPG). The impact of the CPG on hospital costs has not been studied. METHODS: PHN CLS clinical data were linked to cost data from Children's Hospital Association by matching on indirect identifiers. Hospital costs were evaluated across active and control sites in the pre- and post-CPG periods using generalized linear mixed-effects models. A difference-in-difference approach was used to assess whether changes in cost observed in active sites were beyond secular trends in control sites. RESULTS: Data were successfully linked on 410 of 428 eligible patients (96%) from four active and four control sites. Mean adjusted cost per case for TOF repair was significantly reduced in the post-CPG period at active sites ($42,833 vs $56,304, p < 0.01) and unchanged at control sites ($47,007 vs $46,476, p = 0.91), with an overall cost reduction of 27% in active versus control sites (p = 0.03). Specific categories of cost reduced in the TOF cohort included clinical (-66%, p < 0.01), pharmacy (-46%, p = 0.04), lab (-44%, p < 0.01), and imaging (-32%, p < 0.01). There was no change in costs for CoA repair at active or control sites. CONCLUSIONS: The early extubation CPG was associated with a reduction in hospital costs for infants undergoing repair of TOF but not CoA. This CPG represents an opportunity to both optimize clinical outcome and reduce costs for certain infant cardiac surgeries.

Out-of-pocket medical expenses in severe CHD.

IntroductionFamilies of children born with CHD face added stress owing to uncertainty about the magnitude of the financial burden for medical costs they will face. This study seeks to assess the family responsibility for healthcare bills during the first 12 months of life for commercially insured children undergoing surgery for severe CHD. METHODS: The MarketScan ® database from Truven was used to identify commercially insured infants in 39 states from 2010 to 2012 with an ICD-9 diagnosis code for transposition of the great arteries, tetralogy of Fallot, or truncus arteriosus, as well as the corresponding procedure code for complete repair. Data extraction identified payment responsibilities of the patients' families in the form of co-payments, deductibles, and co-insurance during the 1st year of life. RESULTS: There were 481 infants identified who met the criteria. Average family responsibility for healthcare bills during the 1st year of life was $2928, with no difference between the three groups. The range of out-of-pocket costs was $50-$18,167. Initial hospitalisation and outpatient care accounted for the majority of these responsibilities. CONCLUSIONS: Families of commercially insured children with severe CHD requiring corrective surgery face an average of ~$3000 in out-of-pocket costs for healthcare bills during the first 12 months of their child's life, although the amount varied considerably. This information provides a framework to alleviate some of the uncertainty surrounding healthcare financial responsibilities, and further examination of the origination of these expenditures may be useful in informing future healthcare policy discussion.

Cost Variation Across Centers for the Norwood Operation.

BACKGROUND: The Norwood operation is associated with high health care utilization, and prior studies reported substantial variability in Norwood costs across centers. However, specific factors driving this cost variation are unclear. We assessed center variability in Norwood costs and underlying mechanisms in a multicenter cohort. METHODS: Clinical data from the Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction trial were linked with cost data from the Children's Hospital Association Inpatient Essentials database. Center variation was assessed by modeling Norwood costs adjusted for baseline patient characteristics, and the relationship with complications, length of stay (LOS), and specific cost categories was examined. Patients undergoing transplantation or stage 2 palliation during the Norwood admission were excluded. RESULTS: Nine centers (332 patients) were included. Adjusted mean cost/case varied 4.6-fold across centers (range: $50,559 to $230,851, p < 0.001). In addition, variation was found across centers in the adjusted mean number of complications/case (2.6-fold variation) and adjusted mean LOS/case (1.9-fold variation). Differences in complications explained 63% of the cost variation across centers. After accounting for complications, differences in LOS explained 66% of the remaining cost variation. Seven specific complications were found to occur more frequently at high-cost centers: pleural effusion, seizures, wound infection, thrombus, liver dysfunction, sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis (all p < 0.001). With regard to types of cost, room and board/supplies and laboratory costs were the primary drivers of cost variation across centers. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified several factors associated with center variation in Norwood costs, which may be targeted in subsequent initiatives aimed at both improving quality of care and reducing costs.

Impact of postoperative complications on hospital costs following the Norwood operation.

UNLABELLED: Introduction Patients undergoing the Norwood operation consume considerable healthcare resources; however, detailed information regarding factors impacting hospitalisation costs is lacking. We evaluated the association of postoperative complications with hospital costs. METHODS: In the present study, we utilised a unique data set consisting of prospectively collected clinical data from the Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction trial linked at the patient level with cost data for 10 hospitals participating in the Children's Hospital Association Case Mix database during the trial period. The relationship between complications and cost was modelled using linear regression, accounting for the skewed distribution of cost, adjusting for within-centre clustering and baseline patient characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 334 eligible Norwood records (97.5%) were matched between data sets. Overall, 82% suffered from at least one complication (median 2; with a range from 0 to 33). Those with complications had longer postoperative length of stay (25 versus 12 days, p<0.001), more total ventilator days (7 versus 5 days, p<0.001), and higher in-hospital mortality (17.6 versus 3.4%, p<0.006). Mean adjusted hospital cost in those with a complication was $190,689 (95% CI $111,344-$326,577) versus $120,584 (95% CI $69,246-$209,983) in those without complications (p=0.002). Costs increased with the number of complications (1-2 complications=$132,800 versus 3-4 complications=$182,353 versus ⩾5 complications=$309,372 [p<0.001]). CONCLUSIONS: This merged data set of clinical trial and cost data demonstrated that postoperative complications are common following the Norwood operation and are associated with worse clinical outcomes and higher costs. Efforts to reduce complications in this population may lead to improved outcomes and cost savings.

Inpatient costs and charges for surgical treatment of hypoplastic left heart syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) is one of the most serious congenital cardiac anomalies. Typically, it is managed with a series of 3 palliative operations or cardiac transplantation. Our goal was to quantify the inpatient resource burden of HLHS across multiple academic medical centers. METHODS: The University HealthSystem Consortium is an alliance of 101 academic medical centers and 178 affiliated hospitals that share diagnostic, procedural, and financial data on all discharges. We examined inpatient resource use by patients with HLHS who underwent a staged palliative procedure or cardiac transplantation between 1998 and 2007. RESULTS: Among 1941 neonates, stage 1 palliation (Norwood or Sano procedure) had a median length of stay (LOS) of 25 days and charges of $214,680. Stage 2 and stage 3 palliation (Glenn and Fontan procedures, respectively) had median LOS and charges of 8 days and $82,174 and 11 days and $79,549, respectively. Primary neonatal transplantation had an LOS of 87 days and charges of $582,920, and rescue transplantation required 36 days and $411,121. The median inpatient wait time for primary and rescue transplants was 42 and 6 days, respectively. Between 1998 and 2007, the LOS for stage 1 palliation increased from 16 to 28 days and inflation-adjusted charges increased from $122,309 to $280,909, largely because of increasing survival rates (57% in 1998 and 83% in 2007). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HLHS demand considerable inpatient resources, whether treated with the Norwood-Glenn-Fontan procedure pathway or cardiac transplantation. Improved survival rates have led to increased hospital stays and costs.