RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Fluid resuscitation is a ubiquitous intervention in the management of patients treated in the intensive care unit, which has implications for intensive care unit resourcing and budgets. Our objective was to calculate the relative cost of resuscitation fluids in several countries to inform future economic evaluations. METHODS: We collected site-level data regarding the availability and cost of fluids as part of an international survey. We normalised costs to net present values using purchasing power parities and published inflation figures. Costs were also adjusted for equi-effective dosing based on intravascular volume expansion effectiveness and expressed as US dollars (USD) per 100 mL crystalloid equivalent. RESULTS: A total of 187 sites had access to cost data. Between countries, there was an approximate six fold variation in the cost of crystalloids and colloids overall. The average cost for crystalloids overall was less than 1 USD per 100 mL. In contrast, colloid fluids had higher average costs (59 USD per 100 mL). After adjusting for equi-effective dosing, saline was â¼27 times less costly than albumin (saline: 0.6 USD per 100 mL crystalloid equivalent; albumin 4-5%: 16.4 USD; albumin 20-25%: 15.8 USD) and â¼4 times less costly than hydroxyethyl starch solution (saline: 0.6 USD; hydroxyethyl starch solution: 2.5 USD). Buffered salt solutions, such as compound sodium acetate solutions (e.g., Plasmalyte®), had the highest average cost of crystalloid fluids, costing between 3 and 4 USD per 100 mL. CONCLUSION: The cost of fluid varies substantially between fluid types and between countries, although normal (0.9%) saline is consistently less costly than colloid preparations and some buffered salt solutions. These data can be used to inform future economic evaluations of fluid preparations.
Assuntos
Hidratação/economia , Substitutos do Plasma , Soluções para Reidratação , Soluções Cristaloides/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Soluções Isotônicas/economia , Substitutos do Plasma/economia , Substitutos do Plasma/uso terapêutico , Soluções para Reidratação/economia , RessuscitaçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine long-term mortality, resource utilization, and healthcare costs in sepsis patients compared to hospitalized nonsepsis controls. DESIGN: Propensity-matched population-based cohort study using administrative data. SETTING: Ontario, Canada. PATIENTS: We identified a cohort of adults (≥ 18) admitted to hospitals in Ontario between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2016, with follow-up to March 31, 2017. Sepsis patients were flagged using a validated International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision-coded algorithm (Sepsis-2 definition), including cases with organ dysfunction (severe sepsis) and without (nonsevere). Remaining hospitalized patients were potential controls. Cases and controls were matched 1:1 on propensity score, age, sex, admission type, and admission date. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Differences in mortality, rehospitalization, hospital length of stay, and healthcare costs were estimated, adjusting for remaining confounders using Cox regression and generalized estimating equations. Of 270,669 sepsis cases, 196,922 (73%) were successfully matched: 64,204 had severe and 132,718 nonsevere sepsis (infection without organ dysfunction). Over follow-up (median 2.0 yr), severe sepsis patients had higher mortality rates than controls (hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.63-1.68). Both severe and nonsevere sepsis patients had higher rehospitalization rates than controls (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.50-1.55 and hazard ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.40-1.43, respectively). Incremental costs (Canadian dollar 2018) in sepsis cases versus controls at 1-year were: $29,238 (95% CI, $28,568-$29,913) for severe and $9,475 (95% CI, $9,150-$9,727) for nonsevere sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Severe sepsis was associated with substantially higher long-term risk of death, rehospitalization, and healthcare costs, highlighting the need for effective postdischarge care for sepsis survivors.
Assuntos
Assistência ao Convalescente/economia , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Alta do Paciente/economia , Sepse/economia , Sepse/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Infecção Hospitalar/economia , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Pontuação de Propensão , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Sepse/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND.: This study estimates the maximum price at which mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy is deemed cost-effective for septic shock patients and identifies parameters that are most important in making treatment decisions. METHODS: We developed a probabilistic Markov model according to the sepsis care trajectory to simulate costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of septic shock patients receiving either MSC therapy or usual care over their lifetime. We calculated the therapeutic headroom by multiplying the gains attributable to MSCs with willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold and derived the maximum reimbursable price (MRP) from the expected net monetary benefit and savings attributable to MSCs. We performed scenario analyses to assess the impact of changes to assumptions on the study findings. A value of information analysis is performed to identify parameters with greatest impact on the uncertainty around the cost-effectiveness of MSC therapy. RESULTS: At a WTP threshold of $50,000 per QALY, the therapeutic headroom and MRP of MSC therapy were $20,941 and $16,748, respectively; these estimates increased with the larger WTP values and the greater impact of MSCs on in-hospital mortality and hospital discharge rates. The parameters with greatest information value were MSC's impact on in-hospital mortality and the baseline septic shock in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: At a common WTP of $50,000/QALY, MSC therapy is deemed to be economically attractive if its unit cost does not exceed $16,748. This ceiling price can be increased to $101,450 if the therapy significantly reduces both in-hospital mortality and increases hospital discharge rates.
Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Economia Médica , Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/economia , Choque Séptico/terapia , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Isotonic crystalloid fluid bolus therapy is used in critically ill children to restore or maintain hemodynamic stability. However, the ideal choice of crystalloid remains to be determined. The most easily available and most frequently used crystalloid is 0.9% saline, an unbalanced crystalloid, that has been associated with hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis and acute kidney injury (AKI). Balanced fluids such as Ringer's lactate (RL) were developed to be closer to the composition of serum. However, they are more expensive and less readily available than 0.9% saline. Few trials have found RL to be associated with more favorable outcomes, but pediatric data is limited and inconsistent. The objective of the present systematic review is to review existing literature to determine the effect of balanced versus unbalanced fluid bolus therapy on metabolic acidosis in critically ill children. METHODS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines, we will conduct a systematic review to retrieve all controlled trials and observational studies comparing balanced and unbalanced resuscitative fluids in critically ill children from age 28 days to 18 years old in any resuscitation settings. Search strategy was developed in collaboration with an experienced clinical research librarian. The primary outcome is the incidence and/or time to resolution of metabolic acidosis. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of hyperchloremia, AKI, duration of renal replacement therapy, vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, total volume of rehydration needed per day, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and length of stay and mortality. Study screening, inclusion, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias will be performed independently by two authors. We intend to perform a meta-analysis with studies that are compatible on the basis of population and outcomes. DISCUSSION: Isotonic crystalloid fluid bolus therapy is a ubiquitous treatment in resuscitation of critically ill pediatric patients and yet there is no clear recommendation to support the choice of balanced versus unbalanced fluid. The present review will summarize current available data in the literature and assess whether recommendations can be generated regarding the choice of crystalloids or otherwise identify knowledge gaps which will open the door to a large-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Assuntos
Acidose , Estado Terminal , Soluções Cristaloides , Hidratação , Ressuscitação , Lactato de Ringer , Adolescente , Criança , Humanos , Acidose/terapia , Injúria Renal Aguda , Estado Terminal/terapia , Soluções Cristaloides/administração & dosagem , Soluções Cristaloides/economia , Hidratação/efeitos adversos , Substitutos do Plasma , Terapia de Substituição Renal/efeitos adversos , Lactato de Ringer/administração & dosagem , Lactato de Ringer/economia , Metanálise como Assunto , Revisões Sistemáticas como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite advances in treatment, acute myocardial infarction (MI) is still associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially in patients with extensive damage and scar formation. Based on some promising preclinical studies, there is interest in the use of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) to promote cardiac repair after acute MI. However, there is a need for a systematic review of this evidence to summarize the efficacy and safety of MSCs in preclinical models of MI. This will better inform the translation of MSC therapy for acute MI and guide the design of a future clinical trial. METHODS/DESIGN: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and BIOSIS Previews will be conducted. We will identify comparative preclinical studies (randomized and non-randomized) of myocardial infarction that include animals given MSC therapy versus a vehicle/placebo. The primary outcome will be left ventricular ejection fraction. Secondary and tertiary outcomes will include death, infarct size, measures of cardiac function, biochemical outcomes, and MSC retention and differentiation. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Subgroup analyses will be performed to measure how various sources of preclinical study heterogeneity affect the direction and magnitude of the primary outcome. We will meta-analyze data using inverse variance random effects modeling. DISCUSSION: This systematic review of preclinical evidence will provide a summary of the efficacy and safety of MSCs in animal models of MI. The results will help determine whether sufficient evidence exists to conduct a clinical trial in humans and inform its design.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais , Células-Tronco Mesenquimais , Infarto do Miocárdio/cirurgia , Animais , Humanos , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto , Função Ventricular EsquerdaRESUMO
Cell dose limits greater use of umbilical cord blood (UCB) in hematopoietic cell transplantation. The clinical benefits of ex vivo expansion need clarity to understand its potential impact. A systematic search of studies addressing UCB ex vivo expansion was conducted. Fifteen clinical studies (349 transplanted patients) and 13 registered trials were identified. The co-infusion of an expanded unit and a second unmanipulated unit (8 studies), the fractional expansion of 12% to 60% of a single unit (5 studies), and the infusion of a single expanded unit (2 studies) were reported. More recently, published studies and 12 of 13 ongoing trials involve the use of novel small molecules in addition to traditional cytokine cocktails. Higher total cell number was closely associated with faster neutrophil engraftment. Compared with historical controls, neutrophil engraftment was significantly accelerated in more recent studies using small molecules or mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) co-culture, and in some cases, platelet recovery was also statistically improved. Recent studies using nicotinamide and StemRegenin-1 reported long-term chimerism of the expanded unit. No significant improvement in survival or other transplant-related outcomes was demonstrated for any of the strategies. Ex vivo expansion of UCB can accelerate initial neutrophil engraftment after transplant. More recent studies suggest that long-term engraftment of ex vivo expanded cord blood units is achievable. Results of larger randomized controlled trials are needed to understand the impact on patient outcomes and health care costs.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco de Sangue do Cordão Umbilical/métodos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Adulto , Plaquetas/citologia , Células da Medula Óssea/citologia , Transplante de Medula Óssea , Criança , Quimerismo , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Técnicas de Cocultura , Criopreservação , Citocinas/metabolismo , Sangue Fetal/citologia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/citologia , Neutrófilos/citologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA) are a new class of regulatory molecules with diverse cellular functions. Recent reports have suggested that extracellular lncRNAs are detectable in human plasma and may serve as biomarkers. Here, we sought to investigate circulating lncRNAs as potential biomarkers for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Eighty-four lncRNAs, representing some of the most abundant and functionally relevant candidates identified in cellular studies, were assessed via RT-qPCR in plasma from PAH and healthy subjects. However, despite preamplification, the majority of lncRNAs were surprisingly undetectable or sporadically detectable, and showed no differential changes. Systematic characterization of plasma/RNA quality and technical performance via internal and external controls revealed no evidence of RNA degradation or RT-qPCR inhibition, and most lncRNAs were robustly detectable in pulmonary tissue. In plasma, lncRNA levels were the lowest among several different RNA species examined, and this was generalizable to other chronic and acute vascular conditions including coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndrome, and septic shock. In addition, two of three previously reported circulating lncRNA biomarker candidates were not detectable in any of the plasma samples. This study reveals new insight on the relative levels of lncRNAs in circulation, which has important implications for their potential development as biomarkers.
Assuntos
Hipertensão Pulmonar/sangue , RNA Longo não Codificante/sangue , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa/métodos , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangue , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Altered levels of circulating extracellular miRNA in plasma and serum have shown promise as non-invasive biomarkers of disease. However, unlike the assessment of cellular miRNA levels for which there are accepted housekeeping genes, analogous reference controls for normalization of circulating miRNA are lacking. Here, we provide an approach to identify and validate circulating miRNA reference controls on a de novo basis, and demonstrate the advantages of these customized internal controls in different disease settings. Importantly, these internal controls overcome key limitations of external spike-in controls. METHODS: Using a global RT-qPCR screen of 1066 miRNAs in plasma from pulmonary hypertension patients (PAH) and healthy subjects as a case example, we identified a large pool of initial candidate miRNAs that were systematically ranked according to their plasma level stability using a predefined algorithm. The performance of the top candidates was validated against multiple comparators, and in a second independent cohort of PAH and control subjects. The broader utility of this approach was demonstrated in a completely different disease setting with 372 miRNAs screened in plasma from septic shock patients and healthy controls. RESULTS: Normalization of data with specific internal reference controls significantly reduced the overall variation in circulating miRNA levels between subjects (relative to raw data), provided a more balanced distribution of up- and down-regulated miRNAs, replicated the results obtained by the benchmark geometric averaging of all detected miRNAs, and outperformed the commonly used external spike-in strategy. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility of identifying circulating reference controls that can reduce extraneous technical variations, and improve the assessment of disease-related changes in plasma miRNA levels. This study provides a novel conceptual framework that addresses a critical and previously unmet need if circulating miRNAs are to advance as reliable diagnostic tools in medicine.
Assuntos
Hipertensão Pulmonar/sangue , MicroRNAs/sangue , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/normas , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa/normas , Choque Séptico/sangue , Hipertensão Pulmonar/genética , MicroRNAs/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , Padrões de Referência , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa/métodos , Choque Séptico/genéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication of critical illness with important clinical consequences. The Prophylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT) is a multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the two most common pharmocoprevention strategies, unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) dalteparin, in medical-surgical patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). E-PROTECT is a prospective and concurrent economic evaluation of the PROTECT trial. METHODS/DESIGN: The primary objective of E-PROTECT is to identify and quantify the total (direct and indirect, variable and fixed) costs associated with the management of critically ill patients participating in the PROTECT trial, and, to combine costs and outcome results to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of LMWH versus UFH, from the acute healthcare system perspective, over a data-rich time horizon of ICU admission and hospital admission. We derive baseline characteristics and probabilities of in-ICU and in-hospital events from all enrolled patients. Total costs are derived from centers, proportional to the numbers of patients enrolled in each country. Direct costs include medication, physician and other personnel costs, diagnostic radiology and laboratory testing, operative and non-operative procedures, costs associated with bleeding, transfusions and treatment-related complications. Indirect costs include ICU and hospital ward overhead costs. Outcomes are the ratio of incremental costs per incremental effects of LMWH versus UFH during hospitalization; incremental cost to prevent a thrombosis at any site (primary outcome); incremental cost to prevent a pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, major bleeding event or episode of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (secondary outcomes) and incremental cost per life-year gained (tertiary outcome). Pre-specified subgroups and sensitivity analyses will be performed and confidence intervals for the estimates of incremental cost-effectiveness will be obtained using bootstrapping. DISCUSSION: This economic evaluation employs a prospective costing methodology concurrent with a randomized controlled blinded clinical trial, with a pre-specified analytic plan, outcome measures, subgroup and sensitivity analyses. This economic evaluation has received only peer-reviewed funding and funders will not play a role in the generation, analysis or decision to submit the manuscripts for publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00182143 . Date of registration: 10 September 2005.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/economia , Dalteparina/administração & dosagem , Dalteparina/economia , Custos de Medicamentos , Fibrinolíticos/administração & dosagem , Fibrinolíticos/economia , Heparina/administração & dosagem , Heparina/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Tromboembolia Venosa/economia , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Austrália , Brasil , Protocolos Clínicos , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Cuidados Críticos , Dalteparina/efeitos adversos , Fibrinolíticos/efeitos adversos , Heparina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Modelos Econômicos , América do Norte , Estudos Prospectivos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Projetos de Pesquisa , Arábia Saudita , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologiaRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication of acute illness, and its prevention is a ubiquitous aspect of inpatient care. A multicenter blinded, randomized trial compared the effectiveness of the most common pharmocoprevention strategies, unfractionated heparin (UFH) and the low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) dalteparin, finding no difference in the primary end point of leg deep-vein thrombosis but a reduced rate of pulmonary embolus and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia among critically ill medical-surgical patients who received dalteparin. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the comparative cost-effectiveness of LMWH vs UFH for prophylaxis against VTE in critically ill patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective economic evaluation concurrent with the Prophylaxis for Thromboembolism in Critical Care Randomized Trial (May 2006 to June 2010). The economic evaluation adopted a health care payer perspective and in-hospital time horizon; derived baseline characteristics and probabilities of intensive care unit and in-hospital events; and measured costs among 2344 patients in 23 centers in 5 countries and applied these costs to measured resource use and effects of all enrolled patients. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Costs, effects, incremental cost-effectiveness of LMWH vs UFH during the period of hospitalization, and sensitivity analyses across cost ranges. RESULTS: Hospital costs per patient were $39,508 (interquartile range [IQR], $24,676 to $71,431) for 1862 patients who received LMWH compared with $40,805 (IQR, $24,393 to $76,139) for 1862 patients who received UFH (incremental cost, -$1297 [IQR, -$4398 to $1404]; P = .41). In 78% of simulations, a strategy using LMWH was most effective and least costly. In sensitivity analyses, a strategy using LMWH remained least costly unless the drug acquisition cost of dalteparin increased from $8 to $179 per dose and was consistent among higher- and lower-spending health care systems. There was no threshold at which lowering the acquisition cost of UFH favored prophylaxis with UFH. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: From a health care payer perspective, the use of the LMWH dalteparin for VTE prophylaxis among critically ill medical-surgical patients was more effective and had similar or lower costs than the use of UFH. These findings were driven by lower rates of pulmonary embolus and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and corresponding lower overall use of resources with LMWH.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/economia , Estado Terminal/economia , Dalteparina/economia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Heparina/economia , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dalteparina/efeitos adversos , Dalteparina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Heparina/efeitos adversos , Heparina/uso terapêutico , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/economia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Embolia Pulmonar/economia , Embolia Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Trombocitopenia/induzido quimicamente , Trombocitopenia/economia , Tromboembolia Venosa/economiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to describe the epidemiology and management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in noncardiac surgery critically ill patients in a retrospective, observational study at 3 mixed medical-surgical, university-affiliated intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted during a 1-year period with any documentation of AF during ICU stay were identified. Demographic data, risk factors, interventions, and outcomes were collected from the medical record. RESULTS: A total of 3081 patients were admitted during the 1-year study period in which 348 consecutive patients (10.5%) had documented AF. Atrial fibrillation was of new onset in 139 patients (4.5%) and preexisting in 186 patients (6.0%). Hemodynamic instability developed in 37% and 10% of patients with new-onset AF and patients with preexisting AF, respectively. Most (73%) patients with new-onset AF had at least 1 modifiable risk factor. Pharmacologic rhythm conversion was attempted in 76% and 26% of patients with new-onset AF and patients with preexisting AF, respectively. Although initially successful in 87% of new-onset cases, 42% reverted back to AF. Electrical conversion was successful in 7 (27%) of 26 and 0 (0%) of 5 of patients with new-onset AF and patients with preexisting AF, respectively. In total, 18% and 62% of patients with new-onset AF and patients with preexisting AF, respectively, who survived to ICU discharge left the ICU in AF. CONCLUSIONS: Atrial fibrillation is common but transient in most ICU patients. Electrical cardioversion is often unsuccessful, and pharmacologic rhythm conversion is often only transiently effective. Modifiable risk factors are common among these patients. Future studies are needed to address the management of AF in the ICU.