Addressing discrepancies: personal experience of a cardiac mission programme in Africa.

The worldwide incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is increasing, reflecting a combination of ongoing infective diseases and a rapid rise in traditional 'western' risk factors. It is estimated that in the next 20 years that CVD be the leading cause of death in developing nations. There are high incidences of rheumatic heart disease, coronary artery disease, cardiomyopathies, uncorrected congenital heart disease and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) associated disease in many low-income countries. Such high levels combined with a lack of diagnostic tests and therapeutic options means mortality and morbidity rates are high. A number of charities and organizations have tried to address the discrepancy of cardiac care within developing areas although the needs remain great. However there is no one global cardiac organization that coordinates such humanitarian work. The challenges of missionary work include the need for appropriate facilities, financial constraints of clinical consumables, and lack of education of local healthcare staff, making the move away from the mission model difficult. The strategy for delivery of care in developing countries should be long term educational and technical support, so that local case volumes increase. However it must be realized that there are many different levels of local services within developing nations with different health and educational needs, including some countries with very high facilities and skills levels, yet high case loads. This paper highlights the personal experience of our organization and the types of diseases encountered in developing countries.

A comparison of Diamond Forrester and coronary calcium scores as gatekeepers for investigations of stable chest pain.

To determine if calcium scores (CS) could act as a more effective gatekeeper than Diamond Forrester (DF) in the assessment of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). A sub-study of the Cardiac CT for the Assessment of Chest Pain and Plaque (CAPP) study, a randomised control trial evaluating the cost-effectiveness of cardiac CT in symptomatic patients with stable chest pain. Stable pain was defined as troponin negative pain without symptoms of unstable angina. 250 patients undergoing cardiac CT had both DF scores and CS calculated, with the accuracy of both evaluated against CT coronary angiogram. Criteria given in UK national guidelines were compared. Of the 250 patients, 4 withdrew. 140 (57 %) patients were male. The mean DF was 47.8 and mean CS 172.5. Of the 144 patients with non-anginal pain 19.4 % had significant disease (>50 % stenosis). In general the DF over estimated the presence of CAD whereas the CS reclassified patients to lower risk groups, with 91 in the high risk DF category compared to 26 in the CS. Both receiver operating curve and McNemar Bowker test analysis suggested the DF was less accurate in the prediction of CAD compared to CS [Formula: see text] Projected downstream investigations were also calculated, with the cost per number of significant stenoses identified cheaper with the CS criteria. Patients with suspected stable CAD are more accurately risk stratified by CS compared to the traditional DF. CS was more successful in the prediction of significant stenosis and appears to be more effective at targeting clinical resources to those patients that are in need of them.