Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Urol ; 177(6): 2050-7, 2007 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17509285

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We quantified the burden of prostatitis in the United States by identifying trends in the use of health care resources and estimating the economic impact of the disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analytical methods used to generate these results were described previously. RESULTS: The rate of national inpatient hospitalizations for a diagnosis of prostatitis decreased by 21% between 1994 and 2000. Hospitalization rates were 2 to 2.5 times higher for Medicare beneficiaries with a 42% decrease between 1992 and 2001. Combined physician outpatient and hospital outpatient visits revealed an age adjusted, annualized visit rate for prostatitis of 1,798/100,000 population. More than 6% of visits with a primary diagnosis of prostatitis had a concomitant diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The most common medications associated with any visits for prostatitis were quinolones (annualized rate 319/100,000 population) and the rate remained about the same even after visits for infectious prostatitis were removed from the data. The cost of prostatitis was about $84 million annually, exclusive of pharmaceutical spending. Of 897 privately insured men with a medical claim for prostatitis in 2002, 14% missed some work because of the condition. CONCLUSIONS: Overall spending in the United States for the diagnosis and management of prostatitis, exclusive of pharmaceutical spending, totaled $84 million in 2000 and it appears to be increasing with time. Given the extensive gaps in our understanding of the diagnosis of and treatment for prostatitis, many of these expenditures may represent a waste of resources.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Prostatite/economia , Prostatite/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/tendências , Gastos em Saúde/tendências , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos em Saúde/tendências , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prostatite/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr ; (33): 78-101, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15504921

RESUMO

Prostate cancer outcomes research incorporates a broad spectrum of endpoints, from clinical or intermediate endpoints, such as tumor shrinkage or patient compliance, to final endpoints, such as survival or disease-free survival. Three types of nontraditional endpoints that are of growing interest-health-related quality of life (QOL), satisfaction with care, and economic cost impact-hold the promise of improving our ability to understand the full burden of prostate cancer screening and treatment. In this article we review the last decade's published literature regarding the health-related QOL, satisfaction, and economic outcomes of prostate cancer screening and treatment to determine the "state of the science" of outcomes measurement. The focus is the enumeration of the types of outcome measurement used in the studies not the determination of the results of the studies. Studies were identified by searching Medline (1990-2000). Articles were included if they presented original data on any patient-centered outcome (including costs or survival alone) for men screened and treated for prostate cancer. Review papers were excluded unless they were quantitative syntheses of the results of other primary studies. Economic and decision analytic papers were included if they presented information on outcomes of real or hypothetical patient cohorts. Each retrieved article was reviewed by one of the authors. Included papers were assigned one primary, mutually exclusive study design. For the "primary data" studies, information was abstracted on care setting, dates of the study, sample size, racial distribution, age, tumor differentiation, tumor stage, survival, statistical power, and types of outcomes measures (QOL-generic, QOL-cancer specific, QOL-prostate cancer specific, satisfaction, costs, utilities, and other). For the "economic and decision analytic" papers, information was abstracted on stage of disease, age range, outcomes, costs, and whether utilities were measured. Of the 198 included papers, there were 161 primary data papers categorized as follows: randomized trial (n = 28), nonrandomized trial (n = 13), prospective or retrospective cohort study (n = 55), case-control study (n = 0), cross-sectional study (n = 63), and meta-analysis (n = 2). The remaining 37 papers were economic and decision analytic papers. Among the 149 primary data papers that contained patient outcome data, there were 42 standard instruments used, accounting for 44% (179 of 410) of the measures overall. Almost three-quarters (71%) of papers included one, two, or three outcomes measures of all types (standard and nonstandard); three papers included seven outcomes measures, and one paper included nine. Over the 11-year time period, there was a nonstatistically significant trend toward more frequent use of standardized QOL instruments and a statistically significant trend toward increased reporting of race (P = .003). Standardization of measurement of health-related QOL, satisfaction with care, and economic cost effect among men screened and treated for prostate cancer is needed. A core set of similar questions, both generic and disease-specific, should ideally be asked in every study, although investigators should be encouraged to include additional question sets as appropriate to individual studies to get a more complete picture of how patients screened and treated for this condition are doing over time.


Assuntos
Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Satisfação do Paciente , Neoplasias da Próstata/economia , Neoplasias da Próstata/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia
4.
Arch Intern Med ; 164(11): 1231-6, 2004 Jun 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15197050

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little information exists on the economic impact of chronic prostatitis. The objective of this study was to determine the direct and indirect costs associated with chronic prostatitis. METHODS: Outcomes were assessed using a questionnaire designed to capture health care resource utilization. Resource estimates were converted into unit costs with direct medical cost estimates based on hospital cost-accounting data and indirect costs based on modified labor force, employment, and earnings data from the US Census Bureau. RESULTS: The total direct costs for the 3 months prior to entry into the cohort, excluding hospitalization, were $126 915 for the 167 study participants for an average of $954 per person among the 133 consumers. Of the men, 26% reported work loss valued at an average of $551. The average total costs (direct and indirect) for the 3 months was $1099 per person for those 137 men who had resource consumption with an expected annual total cost per person of $4397. For those study participants with any incurred costs, tests for association revealed that the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (P<.001) and each of the 3 subcategories of pain (P =.003), urinary function (P =.03), and quality-of-life (P =.002) were significantly associated with resource use, although the quality-of-life subscale score from the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index was the only predictor of resource consumption. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic prostatitis is associated with substantial costs and lower quality-of-life scores, which predicted resource consumption. The economic impact of chronic prostatitis warrants increased medical attention and resources to identify and test effective treatment strategies.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Prostatite/economia , Absenteísmo , Adulto , Doença Crônica/economia , Estudos de Coortes , Custos Diretos de Serviços/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Prostatite/diagnóstico , Prostatite/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
5.
World J Urol ; 21(2): 86-9, 2003 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12682773

RESUMO

Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a common condition, affecting men of all ages. Since mortality and serious complications are extremely uncommon, CP/CPPS is primarily a quality-of-life disease, and, therefore, the patient's perspective is of paramount importance. As with other non-life threatening diseases, the goal of treatment is to maximize quality not quantity of life. Scientifically validated methods to measure patients' health related quality of life have been applied in other urological diseases such as benign prostatic hyperplasia and interstitial cystitis; the same process is now underway in the study of CP/CPPS. Recent studies have shown that CP/CPPS takes a substantial toll on physical and mental health. In addition to examining the health related quality of life of patients with CP/CPPS, future studies should address additional patient-centered outcomes, such as satisfaction with care and the economic burden of the illness, in order to allow a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of this condition on patients.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Dor Pélvica/diagnóstico , Prostatite/diagnóstico , Qualidade de Vida , Doença Crônica , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Dor Pélvica/complicações , Dor Pélvica/psicologia , Prostatite/complicações , Prostatite/psicologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA