Diagnostic approach and management of cow's-milk protein allergy in infants and children: ESPGHAN GI Committee practical guidelines.

OBJECTIVES: This guideline provides recommendations for the diagnosis and management of suspected cow's-milk protein allergy (CMPA) in Europe. It presents a practical approach with a diagnostic algorithm and is based on recently published evidence-based guidelines on CMPA. DIAGNOSIS: If CMPA is suspected by history and examination, then strict allergen avoidance is initiated. In certain circumstances (eg, a clear history of immediate symptoms, a life-threatening reaction with a positive test for CMP-specific IgE), the diagnosis can be made without a milk challenge. In all other circumstances, a controlled oral food challenge (open or blind) under medical supervision is required to confirm or exclude the diagnosis of CMPA. TREATMENT: In breast-fed infants, the mother should start a strict CMP-free diet. Non-breast-fed infants with confirmed CMPA should receive an extensively hydrolyzed protein-based formula with proven efficacy in appropriate clinical trials; amino acids-based formulae are reserved for certain situations. Soy protein formula, if tolerated, is an option beyond 6 months of age. Nutritional counseling and regular monitoring of growth are mandatory in all age groups requiring CMP exclusion. REEVALUATION: Patients should be reevaluated every 6 to 12 months to assess whether they have developed tolerance to CMP. This is achieved in >75% by 3 years of age and >90% by 6 years of age. Inappropriate or overly long dietary eliminations should be avoided. Such restrictions may impair the quality of life of both child and family, induce improper growth, and incur unnecessary health care costs.

Tube feeding and bone marrow transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Children undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT) have poor oral intake during the transplant period, caused mainly by the intensive therapy used for their conditioning. Nutritional support (NS) is almost always needed. Whenever possible, tube feeding (TF) is preferred to parenteral nutrition (PN) because its more physiologic and causes fewer complications. However, children undergoing BMT are usually parenterally fed. We, therefore, studied whether TF was tolerated in children undergoing BMT and whether the nutritional intake was adequate in comparison to PN. PROCEDURE: Two groups were compared: TF (n = 12) and PN (n = 22). If intolerance for TF occurred, additional or total PN was given. Nutritional status, intake, complications, and costs were assessed. RESULTS: Both groups had an adequate nutritional status and reached 85% of their nutritional requirements. TF was possible in 62% of the NS days and three children could be exclusively fed with TF. A longer pre-transplant duration of TF seemed to increase the enteral tolerance. Gastrointestinal symptoms were equally frequent in TF as in PN, but cholestasis was less frequent in TF. The mean nutritional cost per child in the TF group was 440 US dollars less than in the PN group. CONCLUSIONS: TF is possible and equal in efficacy to PN in children undergoing BMT, and may have budgetary benefits.

Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of a new strategy to screen for celiac disease in children with Down syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the best approach to screen for celiac disease (CD) in patients with Down syndrome (DS). STUDY DESIGN: One hundred thirty-seven children with DS were followed up longitudinally. CD screening was offered in 1994, 1996, and 1999 by determination of serum immunoglobulin A-anti-endomysium antibodies (AEA). The HLA-DQA1*0501/DQB1*02 allelic combination known to be strongly positively associated with CD was typed. All IgA-AEA-positive children were given the opportunity to undergo a small bowel biopsy: if villous atrophy was found, the diagnosis of CD was established. RESULTS: CD was diagnosed in 11 (8%) children: 8 in 1994 and 3 in 1996. All of them carried the HLA-DQ alleles associated with CD. The presence of symptoms was not useful in discriminating which children could have CD. CONCLUSIONS: Screening once in a lifetime is not enough to detect CD in patients with DS. We propose a new, accurate, and cost-sparing 2-step strategy for screening, based on selection of the individuals with potential CD by HLA-DQ typing and on longitudinal serologic CD screening in this selected group.