Socioeconomic Challenges in the Rural Patient Population in Need of Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Many challenges exist for the rural patient in need of joint arthroplasty. Optimization for surgery is more difficult due to factors such as deprivation, education, employment, household income, and access to proper surgical institutions. Rural individuals have less access to primary care and even less access to surgical specialists, creating a distinct subset of patients who endure higher costs, poorer outcomes, and lack of care. Reducing socioeconomic disparities in rural communities will require policy initiatives addressing the components of socioeconomic status (income, education, and occupation). Hopefully remote patient technologies can help with access and timely addressing of modifiable risk factors.

Price Transparency for Primary Hip & Knee Arthroplasty: An Overview of the Top 50 US News and World Report Orthopedic Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has mandated all hospitals to publish the charges of 300 common procedures to provide price transparency. The aims of our study are to evaluate 50 top orthopedic hospitals to determine compliance with this mandate and to assess the ease of finding cost information for arthroplasty procedures. METHODS: The websites of the top 50 US News and World Report (USNWR) orthopedic hospitals were searched to find publicly accessible procedural charges. Data included the number of clicks to locate pricing documents, number of files provided, and number of data rows pertaining to arthroplasty. Charge data was queried based on Diagnosis related group (DRG) codes (469, 470), Current Procedural Technology (CPT) codes (27130, 27477), and keyword searches ("arthroplasty", "total hip", and "total knee"). RESULTS: Forty-four (88%) of the top 50 USNWR Orthopedic institutions had publicly accessible files containing cost information. Thirty three of the 44 institutions provided results with DRG search while less than 10 institutions used CPT and keyword searches. There was an average of 226,190 (range 304-1,121,876) rows of data per file. Average charges varied depending on the use of DRG, CPT or keyword searches ($6,663-$117,072). CONCLUSION: The majority of compliant hospitals published large data files requiring the use of DRG codes to find cost information with extreme variation in resultant charges provided. These findings underscore the lack of direct patient benefit afforded by the current mandate, as pricing determinations require expert knowledge in medical coding and have a high variability in the reported charges.

The Hip and Femur Fracture Bundle: Preliminary Findings From a Tertiary Hospital.

BACKGROUND: The voluntary hip and femur fracture Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced (BCPI-A) includes Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) 480, 481, and 482, which include diverse and medically complex patients undergoing urgent inpatient surgery without optimization. Concern exists that this bundle is financially unfavorable for hospitals, and this study aimed to identify the costliest services. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a 12-month cohort of 32 consecutive patients in the DRG 480-482 bundle at our academic tertiary referral center. Cost of discharge disposition, readmission, and other variables were analyzed for all patients in the 90-day bundle. RESULTS: Overall, a net financial gain averaging $2,028 per patient (range -$52,128 to +$30,199) was seen. Discharge to facilities (n = 19) resulted in higher costs than discharge to home (n = 11, P < .0001). Use of inpatient rehabilitation (n = 6) averaged a loss of $11,028 per patient and use of skilled nursing facilities (n = 15) averaged a loss of $7,250 per patient, compared to a gain of $15,011 for patients discharged home (n = 11). Episodes with readmission (n = 6) averaged a loss of only $1,390. Total index admission costs averaged $12,489 ± $2,235 per patient (range $9,329-$18,884) while post-inpatient cost averaged $30,150 per patient (range $4,803 - $77,768). CONCLUSION: The BPCI-A hip and femur fracture bundle has a wide variability in costs, with the largest component in the post-acute care phase. Discharge home is favorable in the bundle while discharge to post-acute facilities leads to net losses. Institutions in this bundle need to develop multi-disciplinary teams to promote safe discharge home.

Variations in Cost and Readmissions of Patients in the Bundled Payment for Care Improvement Bundle for Hip and Femur Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: The Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) for hip and femur fractures is an effort to increase care quality and coordination at a lower cost. The bundle includes all patients undergoing an operative fixation of a hip or femur fracture (diagnosis-related group codes 480-482). This study aims to investigate variance in the hospital cost and readmission rates for patients within the bundle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study is a retrospective analysis of patients ≥65 years old billed for a diagnosis-related groups 480-482 in 2016 in the National Readmission Database. Cost of admission and length of stay were compared between patients who were or were not readmitted. Regression analysis was used to determine the effects of the primary procedure code and anatomical location of the femur fracture on costs, length of stay, and readmission rates. RESULTS: Patients that were readmitted within 90 days of surgery had an increased cost on initial admission ($18,427 vs $16,844, P < .0001), and an increased length of stay (6.24 vs 5.42, P < .0001). When stratified by procedure, patients varied in readmission rates (20.7% vs 19.6% vs 21.8%), initial cost, and length of stay (LOS). Stratification by anatomical location also led to variation in readmission rates (20.7% vs 18.3% vs 20.6%), initial cost, and LOS. CONCLUSION: The hip and femur fractures bundle includes a great number of procedures with variance in cost, readmission, and length of stay. This amount of variation may make standardization difficult and may put the hospital at potential financial risk.

Length of Stay After Joint Arthroplasty is Less Than Predicted Using Two Risk Calculators.

BACKGROUND: Predicting the length of stay (LOS) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has become more important with their recent removal from inpatient-only designation. The American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical risk calculator and the CMS' diagnosis-related group (DRG) calculator are two common LOS predictors. The aim of our study was to determine how our actual LOS compared with those predicted by both the ACS and DRG. METHODS: 99 consecutive TJA (49 hips and 50 knee procedures) were reviewed in Medicare-eligible patients from four fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons. Predicted LOS was calculated using the DRG and ACS risk calculators for each patient using demographics, medical histories, and comorbidities. LOS was compared between the predicted and the actual LOS for both total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using paired t-tests. RESULTS: Actual LOS was shorter in the THA group vs the TKA group (1.29 days vs 1.46 days, P < .05). The actual LOS of patients at our institution was significantly shorter than both DRG and ACS predictions for both THA and TKA (P < .05). In both the THA and TKA patients, the actual LOS (1.29 and 1.46 day) was significantly shorter than the DRG-predicted LOS (2.15 and 2.15 days) which was significantly shorter than the ACS-predicted LOS (2.9 and 3.14 days). CONCLUSION: We found the actual LOS was significantly shorter than that predicted by both the DRG and ACS risk calculators. Current risk calculators may not be accurate for contemporary fast-track protocols and newer tools should be developed.

Narcotic Refills and Patient Satisfaction With Pain Control After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction has become an important metric for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) used to reimburse hospitals. Despite ubiquitous narcotic use for post-TJA pain control, there is little understanding regarding patient factors associated with obtaining opioid refills and associations with patient satisfaction. METHODS: Using our state's mandatory opioid prescription monitoring program, we reviewed preoperative and postoperative narcotic prescriptions filled for 438 consecutive TJA patients. Subjects were divided into 3 groups based on the number of post-TJA narcotic refills obtained (0, 1, or >1), and logistic regression analysis was conducted comparing demographics, surgical factors, and satisfaction with pain control. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five patients (25.8%) did not consume preoperative opioids and received no postoperative refills. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients (P = .0004), subjects ≥65 years (P = .0057), and Medicare patients (P = .0058) had significantly higher rates of 0 postdischarge refills. THA recipients had 268% increased odds of not receiving a refill narcotic (adjusted odds ratio = 0.373; 95% confidence interval, 0.224- 0.622). Every 100-morphine milligram equivalent (MME) increase in presurgery use led to a 16% increase in odds of needing >1 opioid refill (adjusted odds ratio = 1.161; 95% confidence interval, 1.085-1.242). Subjects who noted higher satisfaction consumed less overall opioids when receiving a refill (436 vs 1119 MMEs, P = .021). CONCLUSION: Subjects who received fewer narcotic prescriptions and overall MMEs demonstrated higher rates of satisfaction with early pain control. Our results are consistent with other studies in showing that increased preoperative narcotic use portends higher rates of postoperative refills. There appears to be a subset of THA patients >65 years of age who may be candidates for opioid-sparing analgesia.

Demographics, Treatment, and Cost of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: Fixation Versus Revision.

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFX) are complications of both total hip and knee arthroplasty and may be treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or revision arthroplasty. Differences in treatment and fracture location may be related to patient demographics and lead to differences in cost. Our study examined the effects of demographics and treatment of knee and hip PPFXs on length of stay (LOS) and cost. METHODS: Of all, 932 patients were identified with hip or knee PPFXs in the National Inpatient Sample from January 2013 to September 2015. Age, gender, race, mortality, comorbidity level, LOS, total cost, procedure type, geographic region, and hospital type were recorded. A generalized linear regression model was conducted to analyze the effect of fracture type on LOS and cost. RESULTS: Differences in gender (66% vs 83.7% female, P < .01), comorbidities (fewer in hips, P < .01), and costs (US$30 979 vs US$27 944, P < .01) were found between the hip and knee groups. Knees had significantly higher rates of ORIF treatment (80.7% vs 39.1%) and lower rates of revision arthroplasties (19.3% vs 60.9%) than hip PPFXs (P < .01). Within both groups, patients with more comorbidities, revision surgery, and blood transfusions were more likely to have a longer LOS and higher cost. CONCLUSION: Periprosthetic femur fractures patients are not homogenous and treatment varies between hip and knee locations. For knee patients, those treated with ORIF were younger, with fewer comorbidities than those treated with revision. Conversely, hip patients treated with ORIF were older, with more comorbidities than those treated with revision. Hips had higher costs than knees, and cost correlated with revision arthroplasty and more comorbidities. In both hip and knee groups, longer LOS was associated with more comorbidities and being treated in urban teaching hospitals. Total cost had the strongest associations with revision procedures as well as number of comorbidities and blood product use.

Cost Analysis and Bundled Care of Hip and Knee Replacement.

Financial success in a bundled payment system requires knowledge of the costs of care throughout the period of risk. Understanding the significant cost-drivers of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is crucial in this effort. This article inspects the basics of reimbursement under Medicare's bundled care programs as well as some common investigative tools used in the literature to measure cost. Additionally, the effects of standardized enhanced recovery clinical pathways on costs are reviewed. Finally, drivers of implant costs and several proven measures for implant cost-reduction are evaluated. This review provides surgeons and hospitals successful measures to reduce the cost of TJA via enhanced recovery pathways and reduced implant pricing. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 28(4):241-249, 2019).

Inpatient versus Outpatient Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The rise of improved perioperative recovery protocols after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has led to faster, more streamlined hospital stays for many patients. Combined with the implementation of value-based care and bundled payment initiatives, there has been a paradigm shift toward outpatient TKA surgery. This change to practice has been accelerated by recent policy changes enacted by the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services regarding the removal of TKA as an inpatient only procedure as well as some insurance companies denying preauthorization for inpatient stays after TKA. Our review aims to address the inclusion and exclusion criteria for outpatient TKA consideration, examine the outcomes for outpatient joint replacement surgery, and discuss limitations of widespread adoption for same-day discharges.

Depth of sedation as an interventional target to reduce postoperative delirium: mortality and functional outcomes of the Strategy to Reduce the Incidence of Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The Strategy to Reduce the Incidence of Postoperative Delirium in the Elderly trial tested the hypothesis that limiting sedation during spinal anaesthesia decreases in-hospital postoperative delirium after hip fracture repair. This manuscript reports the secondary outcomes of this trial, including mortality and function. METHODS: Two hundred patients (≥65 yr) undergoing hip fracture repair with spinal anaesthesia were randomised to heavier [modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score (OAA/S) 0-2] or lighter (OAA/S 3-5) sedation, and were assessed for postoperative delirium. Secondary outcomes included mortality and return to pre-fracture ambulation level at 1 yr. Kaplan-Meier analysis, multivariable Cox proportional hazard model, and logistic regression were used to evaluate intervention effects on mortality and odds of ambulation return. RESULTS: One-year mortality was 14% in both groups (log rank P=0.96). Independent risk factors for 1-yr mortality included: Charlson comorbidity index [hazard ratio (HR)=1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.49; P=0.03], instrumental activities of daily living [HR=0.74, 95% CI, 0.60-0.91; P=0.005], BMI [HR=0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.998; P=0.04], and delirium severity [HR=1.20, 95% CI, 1.03-1.41; P=0.02]. Ambulation returned to pre-fracture levels, worsened, or was not obtained in 64%, 30%, and 6% of 1 yr survivors, respectively. Lighter sedation did not improve odds of ambulation return at 1 yr [odds ratio (OR)=0.76, 95% CI, 0.24-2.4; P=0.63]. Independent risk factors for ambulation return included Charlson comorbidity index [OR=0.71, 95% CI, 0.53-0.97; P=0.03] and delirium [OR=0.32, 95% CI, 0.10-0.97; P=0.04]. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that in elderly patients having hip fracture surgery with spinal anaesthesia supplemented with propofol sedation, heavier intraoperative sedation was not associated with significant differences in mortality or return to pre-fracture ambulation up to 1 yr after surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00590707.

Standardization of Acrylic Bone Cement Mixing Protocols for Total Knee Arthroplasty Results in Cost Savings.

Cost reduction is important in total joint replacement surgery. Bone cement is used to fixate implants in most knee replacement procedures. The authors instituted a 4-pronged approach to reduce the cost of cement. Their approach included reducing the cost of the cement powder, changing the type of mixing method, using less antibiotic cement, and decreasing the amount of cement required for smaller implants. The authors evaluated the implementation of this program and measured the overall costs of cementation during knee replacement. A retrospective review of total knee replacement cementation technique and cost was performed before and after the cost-reduction program was implemented. The type of cement and cement mixing equipment used, the amount of cement used, and the cost of cement and cement mixing equipment were examined. The authors also reported the short-term complication rate including 90-day readmission rate and 30-day revision rate. The program resulted in an overall decrease in cement-related costs from approximately $310 to $105 per case. Reductions in the amount of cement used and the use of antibiotic cement were shown. Among the 3 surgeons, adoption of the program varied. Bone cement is an expense of modern total knee replacement. Implementing a cost-reduction program can reduce cement costs without changing quality of cementation. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(5):e671-e675.].

Is Rapid Recovery Hip and Knee Replacement Possible and Safe in the Octogenarian Patient?

BACKGROUND: Rapid recovery programs are now aimed to reduce costs of hip and knee arthroplasties by discharging patients directly home, shortening hospital length of stay (LOS), and reducing readmission rates. Although patients aged 80 years and older are included in the Medicare bundle, little work has been performed to determine if older patients can safely participate in rapid recovery programs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 2482 patients undergoing primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasties (THA and TKA) who all participated in a multifaceted rapid recovery program. The goals of this program were next day discharge to home without the use of home services or post-acute care admission. We examined the hospital LOS and the percentage of patients discharged home as well as 90-day readmission rates to determine efficacy and safety of this program in the patients aged 80 years and older. RESULTS: Octogenarians receiving primary THA and TKA were discharged home >90% of the time with LOSs <2 days and low readmission rates. Revision THA and TKA patients aged 80 years and older were discharged home about 70% of the time with significantly longer LOSs than patients aged more than 80 years. The revision THA patients aged more than 80 years had the highest readmission rates. CONCLUSION: Patients aged more than 80 years can successfully and safely participate in rapid recovery programs.

BPCI: Everyone Wins, Including the Patient.

BACKGROUND: Alternative payment models are becoming increasingly more common with the rising cost of the US health care. Bundled payment programs for elective hip and knee arthroplasty have shown promising results by improved outcomes and significant cost reduction. METHODS: All consecutive total joint arthroplasty with diagnosis-related group (DRG) 469/470 were included in this study. And 1427 episodes from 2009 to 2012 were defined as the baseline group; 461 episodes from October 2013 to September 2014 were defined as the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) group. RESULTS: BPCI group had a 14% reduction in cost per episode. The average length of stay decreased from 3.81 to 2.57 days. All-cause readmissions within 90 days of surgery decreased from 16% to 10%. The average cost of readmission decreased by 23%. Net Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) reconciliation payment for BPCI initiative participation was $1,012,962.79 for this 12-month study. CONCLUSION: Our participation in the 2013-2014 CMS BPCI initiative for DRG 469/470 led to decreased readmissions and significant cost savings. In this study, minimizing hospital length of stay and discharging patients to home were the most effective strategies to achieve these outcomes.

The 2016 Austrian-Swiss-German Fellowship.

The Austrian-Swiss-German (ASG) Traveling Fellowship, which began in 1979, is an annual exchange of surgeons between the German-speaking countries of Austria, Switzerland, and Germany and the English-speaking countries of the United States, England, and Canada. In 2016, 4 fellows were chosen to participate in the fellowship, including Eric Edmonds from the University of California, San Diego; Simon Mears from the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Mathew Sewell from the James Cook University in Middlesbrough, England; and Andrea Veljkovic from the University of British Columbia in Vancouver.

Is the 22 modifier worth it?

The 22 modifier is a Current Procedural Terminology code modifier that allows surgeons to receive additional reimbursement for complex procedures. The goal of this study was to evaluate the rate of, time to, and factors affecting reimbursement for 22-modifier cases filed by orthopedic surgeons. The authors reviewed the charts and billing data of the 150 noncharity spine and total joint replacement cases filed with a 22 modifier at 1 academic institution from 2004 through 2011. Of those 150 cases, 63 (42%) were reimbursed at a rate higher than the fee schedule. For all 150 cases, the mean amount and mean percentage of additional reimbursement were -$86±$1966 (P=.7) and 5.5%±37% (P=.04), respectively. The mean reimbursement time for private and public payers was 138±126 days (P<.001) and 118±129 days (P<.001), respectively (standard time, 30 and 15 days, respectively). The mean present values of the amount and percentage received compared with the fee schedule were -$144±$1966 (P=.8) and 4.1%±37% (P=.09), respectively (discount rate, 5%). Anatomic variant was the only cited reason that increased the probability of additional reimbursement (P=.016). Citing that the case required additional time had no bearing on additional reimbursement. The authors conclude that additional reimbursement with the 22 modifier is inconsistent, has significant payment delays, and is not worth the effort for total joint replacement or spine surgery.

Reducing and recycling in joint arthroplasty.

Reducing the need for costly contaminated waste processing after total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) could decrease hospital overhead and the environmental impact. From March through April 2011, we prospectively identified 20 consecutive patients undergoing primary THA or TKA by 1 surgeon in 1 operating room at our institution. For each case, waste (excluding liquids) was collected and sorted as it was produced. The 10 THAs and 10 TKAs produced an average of 30.0 lb (range, 27.1-32.5) and 33.2 lb (range, 30.9-35.2) of waste per procedure, respectively, of which 6.8 lb (range, 6.0-7.8; 22.8%) and 7.3 lb (range, 5.4-8.7; 22.0%), respectively, were potentially recyclable paper or plastic. Waste management programs should focus on recycling clean operating room waste.

A qualitative and quantitative needs assessment of pain management for hospitalized orthopedic patients.

Despite advances in pain management, little formal teaching is given to practitioners and nurses in its use for postoperative orthopedic patients. The goal of our study was to determine the educational needs for orthopedic pain management of our residents, nurses, and physical therapists using a quantitative and qualitative assessment. The needs analysis was conducted in a 10-bed orthopedic unit at a teaching hospital and included a survey given to 20 orthopedic residents, 9 nurses, and 6 physical therapists, followed by focus groups addressing barriers to pain control and knowledge of pain management. Key challenges for nurses included not always having breakthrough pain medication orders and the gap in pain management between cessation of patient-controlled analgesia and ordering and administering oral medications. Key challenges for orthopedic residents included treating pain in patients with a history of substance abuse, assessing pain, and determining when to use long-acting vs short-acting opioids. Focus group assessments revealed a lack of training in pain management and the need for better coordination of care between nurses and practitioners and improved education about special needs groups (the elderly and those with substance abuse issues). This needs assessment showed that orthopedic residents and nurses receive little formal education on pain management, despite having to address pain on a daily basis. This information will be used to develop an educational program to improve pain management for postoperative orthopedic patients. An integrated educational program with orthopedic residents, nurses, and physical therapists would promote understanding of issues for each discipline.

The estimated magnitude and direct hospital costs of prosthetic joint infections in the United States, 1997 to 2004.

To estimate the number and cost of prosthetic joint infection hospitalizations in civilian US hospitals, we analyzed the 1997 to 2004 National Hospital Discharge Survey for the 996.66 International Classification of Diseases discharge code (infection or inflammatory reaction secondary to internal joint prosthesis). The annual number of such hospitalizations averaged 17 589 from 1997 to 2000 and 29 225 from 2001 to 2004. The annual adjusted diagnostic-related group cost for such infection increased from $195 million to $283 million (1997-2004). The mean diagnostic-related group reimbursement ($9034 per hospitalization) did not vary over time or by comorbidity. The nearly doubled number of prosthetic joint infection-related hospitalizations may have been caused by an increased implant rate, changes in patient population, implant procedures, or causative organisms.

Is coding of diagnoses, comorbidities, and complications in total knee arthroplasty accurate?

Coding of diagnoses, comorbidities, and complications is important for health care delivery, not only for appropriate hospital and physician reimbursement, but also for a correct assessment of complication rates. The purpose of this study was to determine the agreement of coding of diagnoses, comorbidities, and complications for total knee arthroplasty between 2 groups of coders. Between January 1, 1997, and November 18, 1997, 100 consecutive primary total knee arthroplasties were done by 2 orthopaedic surgeons. Diagnoses, comorbidities, and complications were coded by professional hospital coders according to the Healthcare Finance Administration guidelines, then recoded by a second team with orthopaedic experience. Although the hospital coders matched diagnoses with the orthopaedic team 96.5% of the time, they determined a complication rate of 1.4 per patient and a comorbidity rate of 2.9 per patient, whereas the orthopaedic team coded for 0.7 complications per patient and 3.7 comorbidities. Based on these results, there should be interaction and communication between hospital coders and health care professionals to check that coding is accurate and reproducible.