Expanding the access to kidney transplantation: Strategies for kidney transplant programs.

Kidney transplantation is the most successful kidney replacement therapy available, resulting in improved recipient survival and societal cost savings. Yet, nearly 70 years after the first successful kidney transplant, there are still numerous barriers and untapped opportunities that constrain the access to transplant. The literature describing these barriers is extensive, but the practices and processes to solve them are less clear. Solutions must be multidisciplinary and be the product of strong partnerships among patients, their networks, health care providers, and transplant programs. Transparency in the referral, evaluation, and listing process as well as organ selection are paramount to build such partnerships. Providing early culturally congruent and patient-centered education as well as maximizing the use of local resources to facilitate the transplant work up should be prioritized. Every opportunity to facilitate pre-emptive kidney transplantation and living donation must be taken. Promoting the use of telemedicine and kidney paired donation as standards of care can positively impact the work up completion and maximize the chances of a living donor kidney transplant.

Collaborative leadership in transplantation: Blending clinical, business, and regulatory roles.

Transplantation is a high-risk, high-cost treatment for end-stage diseases and is the most strictly regulated area of healthcare in the United States. Thus, achieving success for patients and the program requires skillful and collaborative leadership. Various factors, such as outcomes, volume, and financial health, may measure the success of a transplant program. Strong collaboration between clinical and administrative leaders is key to achieving and maintaining success in those three categories. Clinical leaders of adult programs, such as medical and surgical directors, bear the primary responsibility for a program's volume, outcomes, and patient safety, while administrative directors are focused on business intelligence and regulatory compliance. This paper aims to provide readers with insights into the critical role of collaborative leadership in running a successful program, with a focus on clinical, business, and regulatory perspectives.

The prognostic value of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony using gated myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies show that left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (LVD), measured by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), identifies patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) at higher risk for all-cause mortality but these were in small number of patients. We sought to assess the interaction between LVD and LV perfusion pattern in risk-stratification of a large sample size of patients with ESRD. METHODS: From the renal transplantation database maintained at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, we identified consecutive patients with ESRD who had gated SPECT MPI between 2003 and 2007. MPIs were reprocessed to derive LV ejection fraction (EF), perfusion defect size, and LVD [phase bandwidth (BW) and phase standard deviation (SD)]. The primary end-point was all-cause mortality, which was prospectively collected and verified against the social security death index database. RESULTS: There were 828 patients aged 52.6 ± 0.36 years (45% were women and 60% had diabetes mellitus). The LVEF was 54.8 ± 0.4% and the perfusion pattern was abnormal in 334 patients (41%). During a follow-up period of 61 ± 0.9 months, 230 patients (28%) received renal transplants and 290 patients (35%) died. The phase BW (73.1 ± 2.6° vs 66.3 ± 1.8°, P = .02) and SD (25.2 ± 0.8° vs 23.4 ± 0.5°, P = .06) were greater in patients who died than those who survived indicating greater dyssynchrony. Patients with phase BW >56° or SD ≥21° (median values) had worse 5-year survival (64% vs 72%, and 66% vs 71%, log-rank P = .005 and P = .07, respectively). After adjusting for demographics, co-morbidities, LVEF, and perfusion pattern, phase BW was associated with worse outcome (hazard ratio 1.289 95% CI 1.010-1.644, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: LVD by phase analysis of gated SPECT MPI provides prognostic value in ESRD beyond myocardial perfusion and EF.

QT prolongation is an independent predictor of mortality in end-stage renal disease.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the predominant cause of sudden cardiac death in the general population, and sudden cardiac death is the leading cause of mortality in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). HYPOTHESIS: QT-interval prolongation is an independent prognosticator in ESRD. METHODS: We reviewed clinical, electrocardiographic, stress test, and coronary angiography data on ESRD patients evaluated for transplantation at our institution between 2000 and 2004 who underwent coronary angiography. The QT interval was corrected for heart rate and QRS duration (QTc). All-cause mortality data were prospectively collected and verified against the Social Security Death Index database. RESULTS: During 40 +/- 28 months of follow-up, 132 of the 280 (47%) patients died prior to renal transplantation. Patients with a prolonged QTc (39%) had 1-, 3-, and 5-year death-rates of 12%, 36%, and 47%, respectively, vs 8%, 24%, and 36% for those with normal QTc (log-rank P = 0.03). In a multivariate Cox regression model that adjusted for age, gender, diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, presence and severity of CAD on angiography, left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, LV ejection fraction (EF), and multiple other variables, QTc remained to be an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.008, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.001-1.014, P = 0.016). Female gender, decreasing LVEF, and decreasing severity of CAD on angiography were independent predictors of prolonged QTc. CONCLUSIONS: QTc prolongation is an independent predictor of mortality in ESRD patients being evaluated for renal transplantation. The prognostic information gained from the QTc is additive to that provided by the LVEF and the severity of CAD.