Economic evaluation of microbiological and host biomarker-based tests for the diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis in a high burden setting.

Background: Pleural tuberculosis (TB) remains difficult to diagnose. Tests measuring host biomarkers, such as adenosine deaminase (ADA) and unstimulated interferon-gamma, perform better than conventional microbiological tests for TB diagnosis using pleural fluid. However, there is no data on the cost-effectiveness of these diagnostic approaches. Methods: A cost-consequence analysis was performed from the South African healthcare provider perspective to determine the cost-effectiveness of the following strategies for the diagnosis of pleural TB: (I) Smear microscopy (SM); (II) Mycobacterial-Growth-In-Tube liquid culture (MGIT); (III) adenosine deaminase (ADA); (IV) Xpert ULTRA (Xpert); (V) unstimulated interferon-gamma using IRISA-TB™ (IRISA-TB). Costs (2019 USD) were derived from national sources and outcomes from published literature. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as the cost per pleural TB case diagnosed and initiated on treatment (per 1,000 patients screened). Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Total strategy costs ranged from $354,632 (SM) to $390,363 (ADA). Strategies incorporating highly specific tests, including IRISA-TB and Xpert, had the lowest costs associated with unnecessary treatment. In terms of outcomes (per 1,000 screened), IRISA-TB and ADA correctly identified the most pleural TB cases (8.4 and 8.0 cases, respectively), almost double that of MGIT (4.2 cases) and Xpert ULTRA (3.7 cases). IRISA-TB was the most cost-effective strategy, as the cost per pleural TB patient diagnosed and initiated on treatment was $44,084, ~$5,000 less than ADA (the second most cost-effective strategy; $49,065). These values were most sensitive to changes in pleural TB prevalence, treatment costs, and empirical treatment rates. The cost difference, compared to ADA, equated to a potential saving of ~US$45 million per year in South Africa. Conclusions: IRISA-TB offers good value for money and is a potentially more cost-effective alternative to ADA for pleural TB diagnosis.

Burden of tuberculosis in intensive care units in Cape Town, South Africa, and assessment of the accuracy and effect on patient outcomes of the Xpert MTB/RIF test on tracheal aspirate samples for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a prospective burden of disease study with a nested randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There are few prospective data about the incidence and mortality associated with pulmonary tuberculosis in intensive care units (ICUs), and none on the accuracy and clinical effect of the Xpert-MTB/RIF assay in this setting. We aimed to measure the frequency of culture-positive tuberculosis in ICUs in Cape Town, South Africa and to assess the performance and effect on patient outcomes of Xpert MTB/RIF versus smear microscopy for diagnosis of tuberculosis. METHODS: We did a prospective burden of disease study with a randomised controlled substudy at the ICUs of four hospitals in Cape Town. Mechanically ventilated adults (≥18 years) with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis admitted between Aug 1, 2010, and July 31, 2013 (irrespective of the reason for admission), were prospectively investigated by culture, and by Xpert-MTB/RIF testing or smear microscopy, of tracheal aspirate samples. In the substudy, patients were randomly assigned (1:1), via a computer-generated allocation list, to smear microscopy or Xpert MTB/RIF. Participants, caregivers, and outcome assessors were not masked to group assignment. Only the laboratory staff were blinded to the clinical details of the participants. In November, 2012, Xpert MTB/RIF was adopted as the initial diagnostic test for respiratory samples in Western Cape province. Thereafter, patients received Xpert MTB/MIF and culture as standard of care. For the whole study cohort, the primary outcome was the frequency of bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis. The primary endpoint of the randomised substudy was the proportion of culture-positive patients on treatment at 48 h after enrolment. The randomised substudy is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01530568. FINDINGS: We investigated 341 patients for suspected pulmonary tuberculosis out of a total of 2309 ICU admissions. 46 (15%) of 317 patients included in the final analysis had a positive test for tuberculosis (Xpert MTB/RIF or culture). Culture-positive patients who failed to initiate treatment (adjusted HR 4·49, 95% CI 1·45-13·89) or who received inotropes (4·33, 1·49-12·60) were more likely to die. However, tuberculosis status was not associated with 28-day or 90-day mortality. In the substudy, we randomly assigned 115 patients to smear microscopy and 111 to Xpert MTB/RIF. Smear microscopy detected six (43%) of 14 culture-positive patients, and Xpert MTB/RIF detected 11 (100%) of 11 culture-positive patients (p=0·002). The proportion of culture-positive patients on treatment at 48 h was higher in the Xpert MTB/RIF group than in the smear microscopy group (11 [92%] of 12 vs nine [53%] of 17; p=0·043), although use of Xpert MTB/RIF had no effect on mortality or other patient outcomes. INTERPRETATION: Tuberculosis is fairly common in ICUs in high-burden settings, and clinicians should screen and test patients for tuberculosis with Xpert MTB/RIF where available. This test improves diagnostic yield and rates of treatment initiation, and reduces unnecessary treatment, but might not increase the total number of patients on treatment when empirical treatment is widely used. A suspected diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis should not exclude patients from ICU care in resource-limited settings because mortality is unaffected by the presence of this disease. FUNDING: European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership, South African Medical Research Council, and the Discovery Foundation.

Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative PCR (Xpert MTB/RIF) for tuberculous pericarditis compared to adenosine deaminase and unstimulated interferon-γ in a high burden setting: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculous pericarditis (TBP) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and is an important treatable cause of heart failure in developing countries. Tuberculous aetiology of pericarditis is difficult to diagnose promptly. The utility of the new quantitative PCR test (Xpert MTB/RIF) for the diagnosis of TBP is unknown. This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF test compared to pericardial adenosine deaminase (ADA) and unstimulated interferon-gamma (uIFNγ) in suspected TBP. METHODS: From October 2009 through September 2012, 151 consecutive patients with suspected TBP were enrolled at a single centre in Cape Town, South Africa. Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture and/or pericardial histology served as the reference standard for definite TBP. Receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis was used for selection of ADA and uIFNγ cut-points. RESULTS: Of the participants, 49% (74/151) were classified as definite TBP, 33% (50/151) as probable TBP and 18% (27/151) as non TBP. A total of 105 (74%) participants were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive. Xpert-MTB/RIF had a sensitivity and specificity (95% confidence interval (CI)) of 63.8% (52.4% to 75.1%) and 100% (85.6% to 100%), respectively. Concentration of pericardial fluid by centrifugation and using standard sample processing did not improve Xpert MTB/RIF accuracy. ADA (≥35 IU/L) and uIFNγ (≥44 pg/ml) both had a sensitivity of 95.7% (88.1% to 98.5%) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.05 (0.02 to 0.10). However, the specificity and positive likelihood ratio of uIFNγ was higher than ADA (96.3% (81.7% to 99.3%) and 25.8 (3.6 to 183.4) versus 84% (65.4% to 93.6%) and 6.0 (3.7 to 9.8); P = 0.03) at an estimated background prevalence of TB of 30%. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of both uIFNγ and ADA were higher than Xpert-MT/RIF (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: uIFNγ offers superior accuracy for the diagnosis of microbiologically confirmed TBP compared to the ADA assay and the Xpert MTB/RIF test.

Do adjunct tuberculosis tests, when combined with Xpert MTB/RIF, improve accuracy and the cost of diagnosis in a resource-poor setting?

Information regarding the utility of adjunct diagnostic tests in combination with Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is limited. We hypothesised adjunct tests could enhance accuracy and/or reduce the cost of tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis prior to MTB/RIF testing, and rule-in or rule-out TB in MTB/RIF-negative individuals. We assessed the accuracy and/or laboratory-associated cost of diagnosis of smear microscopy, chest radiography (CXR) and interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs; T-SPOT-TB (Oxford Immunotec, Oxford, UK) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (Cellestis, Chadstone, Australia)) combined with MTB/RIF for TB in 480 patients in South Africa. When conducted prior to MTB/RIF: 1) smear microscopy followed by MTB/RIF (if smear negative) had the lowest cost of diagnosis of any strategy investigated; 2) a combination of smear microscopy, CXR (if smear negative) and MTB/RIF (if imaging compatible with active TB) did not further reduce the cost per TB case diagnosed; and 3) a normal CXR ruled out TB in 18% of patients (57 out of 324; negative predictive value (NPV) 100%). When downstream adjunct tests were applied to MTB/RIF-negative individuals, radiology ruled out TB in 24% (56 out of 234; NPV 100%), smear microscopy ruled in TB in 21% (seven out of 24) of culture-positive individuals and IGRAs were not useful in either context. In resource-poor settings, smear microscopy combined with MTB/RIF had the highest accuracy and lowest cost of diagnosis compared to either technique alone. In MTB/RIF-negative individuals, CXR has poor rule-in value but can reliably rule out TB in approximately one in four cases. These data inform upon the programmatic utility of MTB/RIF in high-burden settings.