Statewide assessment of telehealth use for obstetrical care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic started a period of rapid transition to telehealth in obstetrical care delivery to maintain social distancing and curb the spread of the virus. The use of telehealth, such as telephone and video visits, remote imaging interpretation, and provider-to-provider consultations, increased in the early months of the pandemic to maintain access to prenatal and postpartum care. Although there is considerable literature on the use of telehealth in obstetrical care, there are limited data on widespread telehealth use among different practice types and patient populations during the pandemic and whether these are preferred technologies. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe variations in telehealth use for obstetrical care among practices in North Carolina during the COVID-19 pandemic and to outline future preferences and needs for continued telehealth use. This study also aimed to delineate telehealth use among rural and micropolitan and metropolitan practices to better understand if telehealth use varied by practice location. STUDY DESIGN: A web-based survey was distributed to practice managers of obstetrical practices in North Carolina from June 14, 2020 to September 14, 2020. Practice managers were contacted through assistance of the Community Care of North Carolina Pregnancy Medical Home program. Practice location was defined as rural, micropolitan, or metropolitan based on the county population. The survey assessed telehealth use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, types of modalities used, and preferences for future use. Descriptive statistics were performed to describe survey responses and compare them by practice location. RESULTS: A total of 295 practice managers were sent a web-based survey and 98 practice managers responded. Responding practices represented 66 of 100 counties in North Carolina with 50 practices from rural and micropolitan counties and 48 practices from metropolitan counties. The most common type of provider reported by practice managers were general obstetrician and gynecologists (85%), and the most common practice type was county health departments (38%). Overall, 9% of practices reported telehealth use before the pandemic and 60% reported telehealth use during the pandemic. The most common type of telehealth modality was telephone visits. There were no significant differences in the uptake of telehealth or in the modalities used by practice location. A total of 40% of practices endorsed a preference for continued telehealth use beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. The most commonly reported need for continuation of telehealth use was assistance with patient access to telehealth technologies (54%). There were no significant differences in the preferences for telehealth continuation or future needs by practice location. CONCLUSION: Telehealth use increased among a variety of practice types during the pandemic with no variation observed by practice location in terms of modalities used, future preferences, or needs. This study assessed statewide uptake of and differences in obstetrical telehealth use during the early COVID-19 pandemic. With telehealth becoming an integral part of obstetrical care delivery, this survey has implications for anticipating the needs of practices and designing innovative solutions for providers and pregnant people beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

The association between care management and neonatal outcomes: the role of a Medicaid-managed pregnancy medical home in North Carolina.

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is a significant clinical and public health issue in the United States. Rates of preterm birth have remained unchanged, and racial disparities persist. Although a causal pathway has not yet been defined, it is likely that a multitude of clinical and social risk factors contribute to a pregnant person's risk. State-based public health and provider programmatic partnerships have the potential to improve care during pregnancy and reduce complications, such as preterm birth. In North Carolina, a state-based Medicaid-managed Pregnancy Medical Home Program screens pregnant individuals for psychosocial and medical risk factors and utilizes community-based care management, to offer support to those at highest risk. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the association between care-management and birth outcomes (low birthweight and preterm birth rates) among high-risk non-Hispanic White and Black pregnant people enrolled in the North Carolina Pregnancy Medical Home. STUDY DESIGN: This was a quasi-experimental study of people in the Medicaid-managed North Carolina Pregnancy Medical Home who had singleton pregnancies and who enrolled in the program between January 2016 and December 2017. Black and White pregnant people were included in the analysis if they had singleton pregnancies, were enrolled in the Pregnancy Medical Home, and for whom there were data regarding care management involvement. Preterm birth and low birthweight were chosen as the outcomes of interest. Two different methodologies were used to test the effect of care management on outcomes: Method 1 evaluated the effect of intensive care management (≥5 face-to-face visits from a care manager) and Method 2 evaluated the effect of the implementation of a specific risk-stratification system. Chi-squared and multivariate logistic regressions were performed as appropriate. RESULTS: From January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, a total of 3564 singleton pregnancies occurred among non-Hispanic Black and White pregnant Medicaid beneficiaries, who were a part of the Pregnancy Medical Home in North Carolina. White pregnant people comprised 57% and Black pregnant people comprised 43% of the sample. In the Method 1 analysis, intensive care management was significantly associated with reductions in preterm birth and low birthweight among Black and White pregnant people whereas in the Method 2 analysis, the implementation of a risk-stratification score only resulted in a significant reduction among Black pregnant people. In multivariable logistic modeling, race, number of prenatal visits, and intensive care management were all significantly associated with the outcomes of interest. CONCLUSION: Care management is associated with reductions in preterm birth and low birthweight in the Medicaid-managed Pregnancy Medical Home in North Carolina. This study contributes to a growing body of literature on the role of state-based initiatives in reducing perinatal morbidity. These results are significant as it demonstrates the importance of care coordination and management, in identifying and providing resources for high-risk pregnant people. In the United States, where pregnancy-related outcomes are poor, programs that address the multitude of economic, social, and clinical complexities are becoming increasingly crucial and necessary.

Preterm Birth and Receipt of Postpartum Contraception Among Women with Medicaid in North Carolina.

OBJECTIVES: To compare receipt of contraception and method effectiveness in the early postpartum period among women with and without a recent preterm birth (PTB). METHODS: We used data from North Carolina birth certificates linked to Medicaid claims. We assessed contraceptive claims with dates of service within 90 days of delivery among a retrospective cohort of women who had a live birth covered by Medicaid between September 2011 and 2012 (n = 58,201). To estimate the odds of receipt of contraception by PTB status (24-36 weeks compared to 37-42 weeks [referent]), we used logistic regression and tested for interaction by parity. To estimate the relationship between PTB and method effectiveness based on the Center for Disease Control and Prevention Levels of Effectiveness of Family Planning Methods (most, moderate and least effective [referent]), we used multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: Less than half of all women with a live birth covered by Medicaid in North Carolina had a contraceptive claim within 90 days postpartum. Women with a recent PTB had a lower prevalence of contraceptive receipt compared to women with a term birth (45.7% vs. 49.6%). Women who experienced a PTB had a lower odds of receiving contraception. When we stratified by parity, women with a PTB had a lower odds of contraceptive receipt among women with more than two births (0.79, 95% CI 0.74-0.85), but not among women with two births or fewer. One-fourth of women received a most effective method. Women with a preterm birth had a lower odds of receiving a most effective method (0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.88) compared to women with a term birth. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Contraceptive receipt was low among women with a live birth covered by Medicaid in North Carolina. To optimize contraceptive use among women at risk for subsequent preterm birth, family planning strategies that are responsive to women's priorities and context, including a history of preterm birth, are needed. SIGNIFICANCE: Access to free or affordable highly effective contraception is associated with reductions in preterm birth. Self-report data indicate that women with a very preterm birth (PTB) are less likely to use highly or moderately effective contraception postpartum compared to women delivering at later gestational ages. Using Medicaid claims data, we found that less than half of all women with a Medicaid covered delivery in North Carolina in 2011-2012 had a contraceptive claim within 90 days postpartum, and one fourth received a most effective method. Women with a PTB and more than two children were least likely to receive any method. Family planning strategies that are responsive to women's priorities and context, including a history of preterm birth, are needed so that women may access their contraceptive method of choice in the postpartum period.

Levels of Maternal Care in the United States: An Assessment of Publicly Available State Guidelines.

Background: Recent increases in maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity highlight the need to improve systems for safe maternity care. We sought to identify whether publicly available state perinatal guidelines incorporate levels of maternal care (LoMC) criteria. Materials and Methods: We searched websites for 50 U.S. states and Washington, D.C. for LoMC guidelines. The Health Resources and Services Administration's Title V Program directors confirmed/updated search results through January 2018. Data abstracted included: (1) definitions of levels; (2) provider types; (3) facility capabilities and services; and (4) programmatic responsibilities as promoted in the 2015 Society for Maternal/Fetal Medicine and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists consensus document on LoMC. Results: LoMC guidelines were identified for 17 states; 12 defined four levels and five defined three levels of care. In Level I, 14/17 states specified obstetric provider availability for every birth and five specified an available surgeon to perform emergency cesareans. Fourteen states specified the availability of blood bank and laboratory services at all times. In the highest level (III or IV), 16/17 state guidelines specified a maternal/fetal medicine specialist; all but two specified anesthesia providers or services. Ten states referenced availability of an onsite intensive care unit in their highest level. All 17 state guidelines specified maternal transport and referral systems. Conclusions: Only one-third of states have publicly available perinatal guidelines incorporating LoMC criteria. Definitions, criteria, and nomenclature varied. Lack of LoMC guidelines with standardized criteria limits monitoring and evaluation of regionalized systems of maternal care.

Potential Effects of Regionalized Maternity Care on U.S. Hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the current patterns of care for women at high risk for delivery-related morbidity to inform discussions about the feasibility of this regionalized approach. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study and linked 2014 American Hospital Association survey and State Inpatient Database data from seven representative states. We used American Hospital Association-reported hospital characteristics and State Inpatient Database procedure codes to assign a level of maternal care to each hospital. We then assigned each patient to a minimum required level of maternal care (I-IV) based on maternal comorbidities captured in the State Inpatient Database. Our outcome was delivery at a hospital with an inappropriately low level of maternal care. Comorbidities associated with delivery at an inappropriate hospital were assessed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The analysis included 845,545 deliveries occurring at 556 hospitals. The majority of women had risk factors appropriate for delivery at level I or II hospitals (85.1% and 12.6%, respectively). A small fraction (2.4%) of women at high risk for maternal morbidity warranted delivery in level III or IV hospitals. The majority (97.6%) of women delivered at a hospital with an appropriate level of maternal care, with only 2.4% of women delivering at a hospital with an inappropriate level of maternal care. However, 43.4% of the 19,988 high-risk patients warranting delivery at level III or IV hospitals delivered at level I or II hospitals. Women with comorbidities likely to benefit from specialized care (eg, maternal cardiac disease, placenta previa with prior uterine surgery) had high rates of delivery at hospitals with an inappropriate level of maternal care (68.2% and 37.7%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Though only 2.41% of deliveries occurred at hospitals with an inappropriate level of maternal care, a substantial fraction of women at risk for maternal morbidity delivered at hospitals potentially unequipped with resources to manage their needs. Promoting triage of high-risk patients to hospitals optimized to provide risk-appropriate care may improve maternal outcomes with minimal effect on most deliveries.

Obstetric Care Consensus #9: Levels of Maternal Care: (Replaces Obstetric Care Consensus Number 2, February 2015).

Maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity, particularly among women of color, have increased in the United States. The leading medical causes of maternal mortality include cardiovascular disease, infection, and common obstetric complications such as hemorrhage and vary by timing relative to the end of pregnancy. Although specific modifications in the clinical management of some of these conditions have been instituted, more can be done to improve the system of care for high-risk women at facility and population levels. The goal of levels of maternal care is to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality, including existing disparities, by encouraging the growth and maturation of systems for the provision of risk-appropriate care specific to maternal health needs. To standardize a complete and integrated system of perinatal regionalization and risk-appropriate maternal care, this classification system establishes levels of maternal care that pertain to basic care (level I), specialty care (level II), subspecialty care (level III), and regional perinatal health care centers (level IV). The determination of the appropriate level of care to be provided by a given facility should be guided by regional and state health care entities, national accreditation and professional organization guidelines, identified regional perinatal health care service needs, and regional resources. State and regional authorities should work together with the multiple institutions within a region, and with the input from their obstetric care providers, to determine the appropriate coordinated system of care and to implement policies that promote and support a regionalized system of care. These relationships enhance the ability of women to give birth safely in their communities while providing support for circumstances when higher level resources are needed. This document is a revision of the original 2015 Levels of Maternal Care Obstetric Care Consensus, which has been revised primarily to clarify terminology and to include more recent data based on published literature and feedback from levels of maternal care implementation.

Emergency Care Utilization Among Pregnant Medicaid Recipients in North Carolina: An Analysis Using Linked Claims and Birth Records.

Objectives To estimate the rate of pregnancy-associated emergency care visits and identify maternal and pregnancy characteristics associated with high utilization of emergency care among pregnant Medicaid recipients in North Carolina. Methods A retrospective cohort study using linked Medicaid hospital claims and birth records of 107,207 pregnant Medicaid recipients who delivered a live-born infant in North Carolina between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2009. Rates were estimated per 1000 member months of Medicaid coverage. High utilization was defined as ≥ 4 visits. Emergency care visits included encounters in the emergency department or obstetric triage unit during pregnancy that did not result in hospital admission. Results During the study period, 57.5% of pregnant Medicaid recipients sought emergency care at least once during pregnancy. There were 171,909 emergency care visits with an overall rate of 202.3 visits per 1000 member months. Among the subset of pregnant women with Medicaid coverage for the majority of their pregnancy (n = 75,157), 18.1% were high utilizers. High emergency care utilization was associated with young age, black race, lower education, tobacco use, late preterm delivery, multifetal gestation, and having ≥ 1 comorbidity. Threatened labor and abdominal pain were the leading indications for visits. Conclusion Utilization of hospital-based emergency care services was common in this cohort of pregnant Medicaid recipients. Additional research is needed to assess the drivers for accessing care through the emergency department, and to examine differences in pregnancy outcomes and health care costs between high and low utilizers.

Postpartum Health Services Requested by Mothers with Newborns Receiving Intensive Care.

Objectives Our pilot study aimed to build knowledge of the postpartum health needs of mothers with infants in a newborn intensive care unit (NICU). Methods Between May 2008 and December 2009, a Certified Nurse Midwife was available during workday hours to provide health care services to mothers visiting their infants in the NICU at a large tertiary care center. Results A total of 424 health service encounters were recorded. Maternal requests for services covered a wide variety of needs, with primary care being the most common. Key health concerns included blood pressure monitoring, colds, coughs, sore throats, insomnia and migraines. Mothers also expressed a need for mental health assessment and support, obstetric care, treatment for sexually transmitted infections, tobacco cessation, breastfeeding assistance, postpartum visits, and provision of contraception. Conclusions Our study suggests that mothers with babies in the NICU have a host of health needs. We also found that women were receptive to receiving health services in a critical care pediatric setting. Intensive care nurseries could feasibly partner with in-patient mother-baby units and/or on-site obstetric clinics to increase access to health care for the mothers of the high-risk newborns in their units. Modifications should be made within health care systems that serve high-risk infants to better address the many needs of the mother/baby dyad in the postpartum period.

Predicting Preterm Birth Among Women Screened by North Carolina's Pregnancy Medical Home Program.

OBJECTIVE: To determine which combination of risk factors from Community Care of North Carolina's (CCNC) Pregnancy Medical Home (PMH) risk screening form was most predictive of preterm birth (PTB) by parity and race/ethnicity. METHODS: This retrospective cohort included pregnant Medicaid patients screened by the PMH program before 24 weeks gestation who delivered a live birth in North Carolina between September 2011-September 2012 (N = 15,428). Data came from CCNC's Case Management Information System, Medicaid claims, and birth certificates. Logistic regression with backward stepwise elimination was used to arrive at the final models. To internally validate the predictive model, we used bootstrapping techniques. RESULTS: The prevalence of PTB was 11 %. Multifetal gestation, a previous PTB, cervical insufficiency, diabetes, renal disease, and hypertension were the strongest risk factors with odds ratios ranging from 2.34 to 10.78. Non-Hispanic black race, underweight, smoking during pregnancy, asthma, other chronic conditions, nulliparity, and a history of a low birth weight infant or fetal death/second trimester loss were additional predictors in the final predictive model. About half of the risk factors prioritized by the PMH program remained in our final model (ROC = 0.66). The odds of PTB associated with food insecurity and obesity differed by parity. The influence of unsafe or unstable housing and short interpregnancy interval on PTB differed by race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the PMH risk screen provides insight to ensure women at highest risk are prioritized for care management. Using multiple data sources, salient risk factors for PTB were identified, allowing for better-targeted approaches for PTB prevention.

Levels of maternal care.

In the 1970s, studies demonstrated that timely access to risk-appropriate neonatal and obstetric care could reduce perinatal mortality. Since the publication of the Toward Improving the Outcome of Pregnancy report, more than 3 decades ago, the conceptual framework of regionalization of care of the woman and the newborn has been gradually separated with recent focus almost entirely on the newborn. In this current document, maternal care refers to all aspects of antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum care of the pregnant woman. The proposed classification system for levels of maternal care pertains to birth centers, basic care (level I), specialty care (level II), subspecialty care (level III), and regional perinatal health care centers (level IV). The goal of regionalized maternal care is for pregnant women at high risk to receive care in facilities that are prepared to provide the required level of specialized care, thereby reducing maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States.

Training needs in operative obstetrics for maternal-fetal medicine fellows.

OBJECTIVE: To define residual operative obstetric training needs for first-year maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) fellows. METHODS: We administered a web-based survey to all 100 first-year fellows. We used descriptive statistics to report frequency data for 13 procedures, and logistic regression to estimate odds ratios for comfort in doing and teaching selected procedures. RESULTS: Response rate was 86% (n = 86). Fellows who completed residency in the Northeast/Midatlantic (n = 26) were less likely to report comfort doing or teaching low forceps deliveries (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05, 0.78; and 0.20, 95% CI 0.04, 0.85, respectively), while those completing fellowship in the West (n = 13), reported more comfort performing breech extraction of a second twin (OR 6.84, 95% CI 1.24, 51.50); fellows completing residency in the Southeast formed the referent group. Fellows reporting completion of the three selected procedures >5 times each during residency were significantly more likely to report comfort doing and teaching them as fellows. Type of residency program (community/academic) was not significantly associated with reported comfort. CONCLUSION: The wide range of operative obstetric experience fellows reported gaining in residency varies by region. Additional research is needed to understand competency and teaching ability for procedural skills, and many MFM fellows may need additional procedural experience.

Putting the "M" back in maternal-fetal medicine.

Although maternal death remains rare in the United States, the rate has not decreased for 3 decades. The rate of severe maternal morbidity, a more prevalent problem, is also rising. Rise in maternal age, in rates of obesity, and in cesarean deliveries as well as more pregnant women with chronic medical conditions all contribute to maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States. We believe it is the responsibility of maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) subspecialists to lead a national effort to decrease maternal mortality and morbidity. In doing so, we hope to reestablish the vital role of MFM subspecialists to take the lead in the performance and coordination of care in complicated obstetrical cases. This article will summarize our initial recommendations to enhance MFM education and training, to establish national standards to improve maternal care and management, and to address critical research gaps in maternal medicine.

Unjustified increase in cost of care resulting from U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of Makena (17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate).

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate for the indication of decreasing the risk of preterm delivery in those high-risk patients who previously had spontaneous preterm birth has come at considerable cost to the health care system. Weekly injections provided by compounding pharmacies starting at 16-20 weeks of gestation and continuing until 36 weeks currently cost the health care system $200 to $300 per pregnancy. This cost is significantly less than the costs associated with delivering and caring for preterm children. Makena, by KV Pharmaceutical, the same 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate product, is priced at $1,500 per injection, or a projected cost of $30,000 per pregnancy. With approximately 132,000 pregnancies being eligible for treatment annually, this increase in cost of 75-150 times what previously had been paid far exceeds the benefits derived from the FDA-approved Makena when compared with previously available compounded versions of 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. This increased health care cost is not justified at this time. The price barrier to access imposed by KV Pharmaceutical actually could result in an increase in preterm deliveries over current rates. Actions are needed by the FDA, national societies, and the manufacturer to ensure that all high-risk patients continue to get the needed therapy to reduce the number of preterm births.

South Carolina Partners for Preterm Birth Prevention: a regional perinatal initiative for the reduction of premature birth in a Medicaid population.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to improve the distribution of preterm deliveries in a Medicaid population through a regional perinatal risk assessment and case management initiative. STUDY DESIGN: An innovative public/private partnership was initiated in the 8 county Lowcountry (LC) perinatal region to reduce preterm birth (PTB) among Medicaid recipient women. Eligible women were identified and underwent telephonic risk assessment, education, and access to a 24 hours, 7 days per week perinatal hotline. Women with predetermined risk factors for PTB were offered patient-centered case management. Medicaid claims and birth certificate data were used to compare obstetric outcomes for 2006 (intervention) and 2004 (control) in both the Lowcountry (LC; program) and Midlands (ML; nonprogram) perinatal regions. RESULTS: There were 6356 Medicaid deliveries in the LC in 2006. Of these, 2111 were referred for telephonic risk assessment; 317 had identifiable PTB risk factors and consented to case management. Compared with 2004, there was a significant improvement in the distribution of preterm birth (P = .05) in the LC region, primarily confined to deliveries less than 28 weeks (1.6% vs 1.1%; P = .029, relative risk [RR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.96). There were also reductions in the frequency (6.7% vs 5.8%; RR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.75-0.98; P = .04) and mean duration (25.0 vs 20.6 days; 95% CI, 1.03-7.77; P = .01) of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions. No changes were identified in the ML region. CONCLUSION: A regional initiative of telephonic risk assessment and case management of Medicaid recipient women significantly reduced deliveries less than 28 weeks and NICU care.