Assessment of the alveolar bone loss in fresh socket implant procedures with immediate implant loading via temporary preformed anatomical healing caps: Comparison of two different lengths of the implant collar.

PURPOSES: The aim of the present clinical and radiologic retrospective study was to evaluate alveolar bone remodeling, in terms of alveolar width and peri­implant bone level, two years after immediate implant positioning (with two different collar lengths, 0.8 mm and 2.0 mm) and loading of preformed healing cap. The Null hypothesis, H0 is: there was no difference between the two groups of implants. METHODS: Patients suffering from single-tooth edentulous areas in premolar, cuspid, and incisive areas were treated with fresh-socket implants and immediate preformed anatomical healing caps. Each final crown restoration was fabricated 3 months later. Primary outcomes (related to loss of the alveolar width and peri­implant bone level) and secondary outcomes (testing adverse events, and measuring implant/prosthesis survival) were acquired and analyzed. RESULTS: A two-year retrospective analysis was conducted on 31 patients (19 female and 12 male), who underwent dental implant placement with implants having two different lengths of the collar: group A, 0.8 mm, and group B, 2.0 mm. As for the width of the alveolar crest, there was a negligible loss (less than half a millimeter) reported for both the groups, anyway reaching a statistical significance. Preoperative alveolar widths (9.50±0.67 mm and 9.45±0.90 mm, respectively for groups A and B) were different from the two-year alveolar widths (9.20±0.74 mm and 8.93±0.99 mm, respectively for groups A and B) with p-values ≤ 0.0049. When the marginal bone loss was assessed, significant differences were registered between the two procedure groups (-1.42±0.34 mm for group A and -0.11±0.15 mm for group B with a p-value < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The proper design of a healing abutment was very important to preserve the emergence profile immediately after extraction and implant placement. The length of the implant collar used with an immediate healing abutment appeared to affect the preservation of the alveolar crest with predictable final results.

Bone assessment around the delayed dental implant with and without preformed anatomical caps: A 1-year retrospective case-control study.

PURPOSES: To investigate the amount of first-year peri­implant bone loss and the development of the papillae when delayed dental implants loaded with anatomic cover screw and those underwent conventional healing protocol were compared. METHODS: Edentulous healed sites had undergone delayed implants placement. In the anatomical cap group, patients were treated with a guided tissue healing, tooth-like cross-linkable acrylic resin caps had been immediately screwed on dental implants. The marginal loss of the alveolar bone height 1 year after surgery and Jemt's papillae index were obtained. Non-parametric statistics were performed with a level of significance of 1% RESULTS: Forty patients were included in the present retrospective analysis. After a follow-up of 1 year, none of the 40 included implants showed a failure. The Jemt's papilla index was 1.76±0.44 and 1.34±0.50 respectively for guided tissue healing and conventional healing group, without any significant difference. Within the first year of survey a bone loss of -1.27±0.26 mm for conventional healing treatment showed a statistically significant difference (p-value<0.0001) when it was compared to the negligible of the other group (-0.06±0.31 mm). CONCLUSIONS: A guided healing procedure with preformed caps seemed to give better outcomes regarding marginal bone loss and papilla index than those of conventional abutments.

Volume assessment of the external contour around immediate implant with or without immediate tooth-like crown provisionalization: A digital intraoral scans study.

PURPOSES: To examine differences between immediate and delayed dental implant loading in maxillary aesthetic areas. METHODS: In this retrospective controlled analysis, 43 subjects who underwent immediate placement of the dental implant in a post-extraction socket were ranked into either immediate (24 implants loaded with non-occlusal tooth-like profile provisional prostheses fabricated by virtual diagnostic impressions and an in-office dental milling machine) or delayed group (19 implants loaded with conventional cover screws and secondary intention healing). Intraoperatively and then four months later, scans of the external layers were acquired with an optical scanner. The width of the alveolar crest and Jemt papilla index were acquired. Non-parametric tests were applied with a level of significance set at p < 0.01. RESULTS: In both groups, the volumes and areas showed significant reductions from the baseline to the 4-month survey. Reductions in volume appeared to be statistically different between the two groups (-39±31 mm3 for the immediate and 89 ± 30 mm3 for the delayed group). The final Jemt papilla index appeared significantly different between the immediate (mesial, 2.5 and, distal, 3) and delayed groups (2 for both aspects). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate provisionalization significantly reduced volume loss and area shrinkage at the external layer when data were compared to a delayed rehabilitation strategy.

Bone Assessment in Grafted and Ungrafted Sockets After Dental Implant Placement: A 10-year Follow-up Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare success and outcomes among implants positioned either in grafted or ungrafted alveoli during 10 years of follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis was conducted on data of subjects who underwent tooth extraction and alveolar ridge preservation. Sites, one per patient, were ranked into three groups: postextraction ungrafted alveoli, and postextraction grafted alveoli with either synthetic magnesium-enriched hydroxyapatite or porcine bone. An absorbable collagen sheet was used to completely cover all the sockets. A secondary intention healing was sought for all procedures. Data regarding implant survival and marginal bone loss around implants were gathered until the 10-year follow up. Pairwise comparisons were performed with nonparametric tests, and statistical significance was set at .01. RESULTS: Sixty-three subjects were included: 42 implants (19 and 23 in the magnesium-enriched hydroxyapatite and porcine bone groups, respectively) placed in grafted sites and 21 in nongrafted sites. The success rate of the grafted groups was 88.1% (CI: 78.3% to 97.9%) at the 10-year follow-up. On the other hand, in the ungrafted group, the overall success rate was 85.7% (CI: 70.8% to 100%). Peri-implant marginal bone loss at the 10-year follow-up for the magnesium-enriched hydroxyapatite group was 1.2 (0.7) mm, while for the porcine bone group, it was close to 0. The behavior of the ungrafted group appeared to be significantly different compared with both grafted groups; however, marginal bone levels ranging from 0.1 to 0.4 mm were observed from 3 to 10 years. CONCLUSION: A difference in terms of long-term success rates between grafted and ungrafted sites was not revealed. Bone loss was significantly higher in the magnesium-enriched hydroxyapatite grafted group compared with those in the other groups (without or with other bone substitute material).