Partial Versus Total Thyroidectomy: What Influences Most Surgeons' Decision? Analysis of a Nationwide Cohort of 375,810 Patients Over 10 Years.

National and international guidelines about thyroid surgery seem to be moving more and more towards less radical surgical procedures but everyday practice does not seem to always align with them. We describe for the first time the role of non-surgical parameters in the surgeon's choice for thyroid surgery. OBJECTIVE: The ain of this study was to describe thyroid surgery and to identify the factors leading to either a total or a partial thyroidectomy regardless of the severity of the thyroid disease. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: National and international guidelines about thyroid surgery seem to be moving more and more toward less radical surgical procedures but everyday practice does not seem to always align with them. METHODS: We based this nationwide retrospective cohort study on a national database that compiles discharge abstracts for every admission for thyroidectomy to French acute healthcare facilities (PMSI database 2010 to 2019). RESULTS: In this study, 375,810 patients (male: 23%; age = 53 ±â€Š15 years) had a thyroidectomy (partial: 28%) for cancer (17%), hyperthyroidism (16%), nonfunctioning goiter (64%), or other (3%). We noticed a global trend toward more partial thyroidectomy (P < 0.001) with a significant increase in the proportion of lobectomy in the post-ATA recommendations' period (P < 0.001) as well as in the "French Levothyrox crisis" period, in which we saw an unexpected rise of adverse events notifications associated with the marketing of a new formula of Levothyrox (P < 0.001) amid widespread media coverage. In a multivariate analysis, we also identified that complete resection was more frequently performed in centers with a caseload >40/year [P < 0.001, odds ratio (OR) = 1.48], for obese patients (body mass index >30 kg/m2; P < 0.001, OR = 1.42), and according to the indication of surgery (OR benign = 1, OR cancer = 2.25, OR hyperthyroidism = 4.13). CONCLUSION: We describe for the first time the role of non-surgical parameters in the surgeon's choice for thyroid surgery.

Self-assessment of voice outcomes after total thyroidectomy using the Voice Handicap Index questionnaire: Results of a prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Voice disorders are frequent after thyroidectomy. We report the long-term voice quality outcomes after thyroidectomy using the voice handicap index self-questionnaire. METHODS: Eight hundred patients who underwent total thyroidectomy between 2014 and 2017 in 7 French hospitals were prospectively included. All patients filled in voice handicap index questionnaires, preoperatively and 2 and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Median (range) voice handicap index scores were significantly increased at month 2 (4 [0; 108]) compared to preoperative values (2 [0; 76]) and were unchanged at month 6 (2 [2; 92]). Clinically significant voice impairment (voice handicap index score difference ≥18 points) was reported in 19.7% at month 2 and 13% at month 6. Thirty-seven (4.6%) had postoperative vocal cord palsy. In patients with vocal cord palsy compared to those without, median voice handicap index scores were increased at month 2 (14 [0; 107] vs 4 [0; 108]; P = .0039), but not at month 6 (5 [0; 92] vs 2 [0; 87]; P = .0702). Clinically significant impairment was reported in 38% vs 19% at month 2 (P = .010), and in 19% vs 13% at month 6 (P = .310). Thyroid weight, postoperative hypocalcemia, vocal cord palsy, and absence of intraoperative neuromonitoring utilization were associated with an increased risk of clinically significant self-perceived voice impairment at month 2. CONCLUSION: Thyroidectomy impairs patients' voice quality perception in patients with and without vocal cord palsy.

Assessment of the Aldosteronona resolution score as a predictive resolution score of hypertension after adrenalectomy for aldosteronoma in French patients.

PURPOSE: Aldosteronoma Resolution Score (ARS) is a predictive score for cure of hypertension after adrenalectomy for hyperaldosteronism and has been validated in American patients. The aim of the study was to validate this score in a French population. METHOD: Data concerning patients operated from 2002 to 2015 in 7 French University Hospitals were retrospectively collected. Diagnosis of Aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) was confirmed with clinical and biochemical hyperaldosteronism and adrenal nodule on CT scan. Adrenal venous sampling was performed when CT failed to identify laterality. ARS is based on four variables: female sex, BMI ≤25 kg/m2, duration of hypertension ≤6 years, number of antihypertensive medications ≤2. One point is attributed for the first three and 2 points for the last. Patients were considered as cured if they had no hypertension and no antihypertensive medications at least 6 months after surgery. Patients with bilateral adrenal hyperplasia were excluded. RESULTS: This multicenter study included 310 patients with APA. ARS and follow-up were obtained in 257 patients. 46.6% of patients were cured and potassium serum level was normalized in 97.7%. In multivariate analysis, odds ratio for female sex, BMI ≤25 kg/m2, duration of hypertension ≤6 years, and number of antihypertensive medications ≤2 were 1.60 (p = 0.09), 1.77 (p = 0.04), 1.28 (p = 0.4), 3.41 (p < 0.001), respectively. Cure rate were, respectively, 22.2, 41.4 and 74% for patients with a score ARS 0-1, 2-3, 4-5. The area under the curve (AUC) of ARS was 0.715. CONCLUSION: ARS is not a predictive score efficient enough in a French population maybe due to different metabolic data and genetic conditions.

Influence of geriatric consultation with comprehensive geriatric assessment on final therapeutic decision in elderly cancer patients.

Elderly patients represent a heterogeneous population in which decisions on cancer treatment are often difficult. The present study aims to report a 2-year period of the activity of geriatric assessment consultations and the impact on treatment decisions. Since January 2007, we have systematically carried out geriatric consultations, using well-known international scales, for elderly patients in whom treatment decisions appear complex to oncologists. From January 2007 to November 2008, 161 patients (57 men, 104 women; median age 82.4 years, range 73-97) were seen at geriatric consultations. Most of the patients (134/161) were undergoing first-line treatment and cancer was metastatic in 86 patients (53%). Geriatric assessment found severe comorbidities (grade 3 or 4 in CIRS-G scale) in 75 patients, dependence for at least one activity of daily living (ADL) in 52 patients, cognitive impairment in 42 patients, malnutrition in 104 patients (65%) and depression in 39 patients. According to the oncologists' prior decisions, there were no changes in treatment decisions in only 29 patients. Cancer treatment was changed in 79 patients (49%), including delayed therapy in 5 patients, less intensive therapy in 29 patients and more intensive therapy in 45 patients. Patients for whom the final decision was delayed or who underwent less intensive therapy had significantly more frequent severe comorbidities (23/34, p<0.01) and dependence for at least one ADL (19/34, p<0.01). In this study, we have found that comprehensive geriatric evaluation did significantly influence treatment decisions in 82% of our older cancer patients.