Prospective Assessment of the Abdominal Hernia-Q (AHQ)-Patient Burden, Reliability, and Longitudinal Assessment of Quality of Life in Hernia Repair.

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the user burden, reliability, and longitudinal validity of the AHQ, a novel VH patient-reported outcomes measure (PROM). BACKGROUND: We developed and psychometrically validated the AHQ as the first VH-specific, stakeholder-informed PROM. Yet, there remains a need to assess the AHQ's clinical applicability and further validate its psychometric properties. METHODS: To assess patient burden, pre- and postoperative patients were timed while completing the corresponding AHQ form. To measure test-retest reliability, a subset of patients completed the AHQ within a week of initial completion, and consecutive responses were correlated. Lastly, patients undergoing VH repair were prospectively administered the pre- and postoperative AHQ forms, the Hernia-Related Quality of Life Survey and the Short Form-12 both preoperatively and at postoperative intervals, up to over a year after surgery. Quality-of-Life scores were correlated from the 3 PROMs and effect sizes were compared using analysis of normal variance. RESULTS: Median response times for the pre- and postoperative AHQ were 1.1 and 2.7 minutes, respectively. The AHQ demonstrates high test-retest reliability coefficients for pre- and postoperative instruments ( r = 0.91, 0.89). The AHQ appropriately and proportionally measures expected changes following surgery and significantly correlates with all times points of theHernia-Related Quality of Life Survey and Short Form-12 MS and 4/5 (80%) SF12-PS. CONCLUSION: The AHQ is a patient-informed, psychometrically-validated, clinical instrument for measuring, quantifying, and tracking PROMs in VH patients. The AHQ exhibits low response burden, excellent reliability, and effectively measures hernia-specific changes in quality-of-Life following ventral hernia repair.

Redesign of US Medical Schools: A Shift from Health Service to Population Health Management.

The integration of medical schools and clinical partners is effectively established through the formation of academic medical centers (AMCs). The tripartite mission of AMCs emphasizes the importance of providing critical clinical services, medical innovation through research, and the education of future health care leaders. Although AMCs represent only 5% of all hospitals, they contribute substantially to serving disadvantaged populations of patients, including an estimated 37% of all charity care and 26% of all Medicaid hospitalizations. Currently, most AMCs use a business model centered upon revenue generated from hospital services and/or practice plans. In the last decade, mounting financial demands have placed significant pressure on AMC finances because of the rising costs associated with complex clinical care and operating diverse graduate medical education programs. A shift toward population health-centric health care management strategies will profoundly influence the predominant forms of health care delivery in the United States in the foreseeable future. Health systems are increasingly pursuing new strategies to manage financial risk, such as forming Accountable Care Organizations and provider-sponsored plans to provide value-based care. Refocusing research and operational capacity toward population health management fosters collaboration and enables reintegration with hospital and clinical partners across care networks, and can potentially create new revenue streams for AMCs. Despite the benefits of population health integration, current literature lacks a blueprint to guide AMCs in the transformation toward sustainable population health management models. The purpose of this paper is to propose a modern conceptual framework that can be operationalized by AMCs in order to achieve a sustainable future.

Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Complex Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Outcomes and Costs for Biologically Based, Local Tissue Rearrangement, and Free Flap Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Various surgical techniques exist for lower extremity reconstruction, but limited high-quality data exist to inform treatment strategies. Using multi-institutional data and rigorous matching, the authors evaluated the effectiveness and cost of three common surgical reconstructive modalities. METHODS: All adult subjects with lower extremity wounds who received bilayer wound matrix, local tissue rearrangement, or free flap reconstruction were retrospectively reviewed (from 2010 to 2017). Cohorts' comorbidities and wound characteristics were balanced. Graft success at 180 days was the primary outcome; readmissions, reoperations, and costs were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Five hundred one subjects (166 matrix, 190 rearrangement, and 145 free flap patients) were evaluated. Matched subjects (n = 312; 104/group) were analyzed. Reconstruction success at 180 days for matrix, local tissue rearrangement, and free flaps was 69.2 percent, 91.3 percent, and 93.3 percent (p < 0.001), and total costs per subject were $34,877, $35,220, and $53,492 (p < 0.001), respectively. Median length of stay was at least 2 days longer for free flaps (p < 0.0001). Readmissions and reoperations were greater for free flaps. Local tissue rearrangement, if achievable, provided success at low cost. Free flaps were effective with large, traumatic wounds but at higher costs and longer length of stay. Matrices successfully treated older, obese patients without exposed bone. CONCLUSIONS: Lower extremity reconstruction can be performed effectively using multiple modalities with varying degrees of success and costs. Local tissue rearrangement and free flaps demonstrate success rates greater than 90 percent. Bilayer wound matrix-based reconstruction effectively treats a distinct patient population. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Retromuscular Mesh Repair Using Fibrin Glue: Early Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness of an Evolving Technique.

BACKGROUND: Retromuscular hernia repairs (RHRs) decrease hernia recurrence and surgical site infections but can cause significant pain. We aimed to determine if pain and postoperative outcomes differed when comparing suture fixation (SF) of mesh to fibrin glue fixation (FGF). METHODS: Patients undergoing RHR (n = 87) between December 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017 were retrospectively identified. Patients received SF of mesh (n = 59, 67.8%) before the senior author changing his technique to FGF (n = 28, 32.2%). These 2 cohorts were matched (age, body mass index, number of prior repairs, mesh type, defect size, and wound class). Outcomes were analyzed using a matched pairs design with multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: Two matched groups (21 FGF and 21 SF) were analyzed (45.2% female, average age 56 years, average body mass index 34.7 kg/m2, and average defect size 330 cm2). Statistical significance was observed for FGF compared with SF: length of stay (3.7 versus 7.1 days, P = 0.032), time with a drain (17.2 versus 27.5 days, P = 0.012), 30-day postoperative visits (2 versus 3, P = 0.003), pain scores (5.2 versus 3.1, P = 0.019) and activity within the first 24 hours (walking versus sitting, P = 0.002). Operative time decreased by 23.1 minutes (P = 0.352) and postoperative narcotic represcription (3 versus. 8 patients, p=0.147) also decreased. Average cost for patients receiving SF was $36,152 compared to $21,782 for FGF (P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Sutureless RHR using FGF may result in decreased pain when compared with a matched cohort receiving SF, translating to enhanced recovery time, shortened hospital stay, and decreased costs.

Ultrasonic debridement management of lower extremity wounds: retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes and cost.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess wound healing outcomes following direct, low-frequency, high-intensity, ultrasonic debridement as a surgical adjunct for non-healing lower extremity wounds. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for patients undergoing lower extremity wound treatment with direct, low-frequency (22.5 kHz), high-intensity (~60 W/cm2) ultrasonic debridement between January 2010 and January 2016. Clinical outcomes were assessed up to 180-days post-ultrasonic debridement. Descriptive statistics, cost and univariate analysis were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 82 wounds in 51 patients were included. Mean age was 57.0 years (range: 32-69), and average body mass index (BMI) was 30.8 kg/m². Patient comorbidities consisted of smoking (47%; n=24), hypertension (75%; n=38), diabetes (45%; n=23), and peripheral vascular disease (51%, n=26). Average wound age at initial presentation was 1013 days (range: 2-5475 days) with an average wound size of 9.0cm x 7.4cm. At 180-days post-debridement, 60% (n=49) of wounds had completely healed. Readmission (47%; n=24) and reoperation (45%; n=23) rates were characterised by the reason for readmission and reoperation respectively. Readmission for wound healing (70%, n=39) was primarily for further debridements (41%; n=16). Wound infection (30%; n=7) was the most common readmission for wound complications (30%; n=17). Reoperations primarily consisted of treatments for further wound healing 96% (n=51). Cost analysis showed a lower total treatment cost for patients with improved healing ($78,698), compared with non-improved wounds ($137,707). CONCLUSION: In a complex, heterogeneous cohort of chronic extremity wounds, the use of direct, low-frequency, high-intensity, ultrasonic debridement is a safe and reliable adjunctive therapy for the management of these wounds.

Comparative Effectiveness of Retromuscular and Intraperitoneal Repair: What Is the Value of Posterior Sheath Reconstruction?

BACKGROUND: The authors hypothesize that posterior sheath reconstruction to achieve retromuscular mesh placement provides outcomes comparable to traditional retromuscular mesh placement and superior to intraperitoneal repair. METHODS: Patients were divided into three groups: (1) retromuscular mesh placement with repaired posterior sheath defects, (2) retromuscular repair with an intact posterior sheath, and (3) intraperitoneal repair. Primary outcomes included recurrence, surgical-site occurrences, and cost. RESULTS: Overall, 179 patients were included. Posterior sheath defects were repaired primarily with absorbable suture or biological mesh. Recurrence rates differed significantly between standard retromuscular repair and intraperitoneal repair groups (p < 0.009), trended toward significance between repaired posterior sheath and intraperitoneal repair groups (p < 0.058), and showed no difference between repaired posterior sheath and standard retromuscular repair (p < 0.608). Retromuscular repair was clinically protective and cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of posterior sheath reconstruction suggests outcomes comparable to traditional retromuscular repair and a trend toward superiority compared with intraperitoneal repair. Achieving retromuscular closure appears to demonstrate clinical and cost efficacy. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.