Parental assessment of pain control following pediatric adenotonsillectomy: Do opioids make a difference?

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative prescribing of opioids following pediatric adenotonsillectomy can have negative consequences including unnecessary opioid exposure and potential for respiratory depression. While guidelines from The American Academy of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery recommend treatment of post adenotonsillectomy pain using acetaminophen and ibuprofen, many providers continue to prescribe opioids and may do so, in part with concern for parental dissatisfaction with post-operative analgesia. Our aim was to determine whether a post-operative prescription for opioids affects parental assessment of pain control following pediatric adenotonsillectomy. METHODS: This post-operative survey assessed the parental assessment of pain control in 324 patients, ages 1-17 years undergoing adenotonsillectomy. This study was conducted at a quaternary care children's hospital in Houston, Texas from December 1, 2018 through March 31, 2019. Post-operative pain regimens included acetaminophen and ibuprofen or combination hydrocodone/acetaminophen in addition to ibuprofen for post-operative analgesia based on the attending surgeons prescribing preferences. The primary study outcome was identification of the proportion of parents rating their child's analgesia following pediatric adenotonsillectomy as poor or inadequate based on the post-operative analgesic regimen including opioids. RESULTS: Of the 798 surveys sent, the response rate was 42% (324/775) of those who received the survey email, and 69% (324/470) for those who opened the email. Between the opioid and non-opioid groups, there was no difference in gender (male; 48% vs. 51.3%; p = 0.58), race/ethnicity (white; 53% vs. 46%; p = 0.35) or insurance status (insured; 62% vs. 50.9%; p = 0.06). The proportion of parents who rated their child's pain as poor or inadequately controlled following adenotonsillectomy was relatively rare: 9% and 5% in the non-opioid and opioid groups, respectively. Parents rating their child's pain as excellent with regards to pain control following adenotonsillectomy were 58% and 50% in the non-opioids and opioid groups respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that non-opioid analgesic regimens following pediatric adenotonsillectomy were not associated with decreased parental satisfaction or an increasing assessment of poor or inadequately controlled pain. Limiting opioid exposure following pediatric adenotonsillectomy is feasible and does not result in worse parental satisfaction with the analgesic plan.

Advanced practice providers and children's hospital-based pediatric otolarynology practices.

INTRODUCTION: Advanced practice providers (APPs), including nurse practitioners and physician assistants, have been deployed in children's hospital-based academic pediatric otolaryngology practices for many years. However, this relationship in terms of prevalence, roles, financial consequences and satisfaction has not been examined. The objective of this study is to explore how APPs impact healthcare delivery in this setting. METHODS: Pediatric otolaryngology chiefs of all academic children's hospitals in the US were electronically surveyed about the ways APPs intersected clinically and financially in their respective practice. RESULTS: A total of 29 of 36 children's hospital-based pediatric otolaryngology practices completed the survey, of which 26 practices (90%) utilized APP. There were large variances within the APP practice cohort in faculty size (mean/median/range = 9.4/8.5/3-29); annual patient visits (mean/median = 18,373/17,600); number of practice site (mean/median/range = 4.3/4/2-9) and number of outpatient APP (mean/median/range = 6.3/5/1-30). No factors (faculty size, annual visits and number of practice sites) differentiated between the APP and non-APP practices. Among APP practices, significant correlation (p<.00001) was observed between size of APP cohort to faculty size and annual visits. 69% of the practices did not differentiate job functions of nurse practitioners and physician assistants. 85% of the practices utilized APPs in all practice sites and 19% utilized APPs in the operating room. 77% of APPs billed independently and 46% had on-site supervision. The most prevalent APP salary bracket based on 0-5, 6-10 and > 11 years of tenure were $76-100K (65%), $100-150K (77%) and $100-150K (86%), respectively. In 46% of the practices, APPs were able to generate enough revenue to cover more than 75% of their salary and 23% of practices generated a profit. 81% of the chiefs ranked the effectiveness of APPs as high (4 and 5) on a 5-point Likert scale. DISCUSSION: The majority of academic pediatric otolaryngology practices employed APPs. Despite the diversity seen in practice complexity, APP functionality and financial impact, most found the APP model to be beneficial in improving patient care, patient access and faculty productivity.