Factors Associated With the Likelihood of Hospitalization Following Emergency Department Visits for Behavioral Health Conditions.

OBJECTIVES: Behavioral health-related emergency department (ED) visits have been linked with ED overcrowding, an increased demand on limited resources, and a longer length of stay (LOS) due in part to patients being admitted to the hospital but waiting for an inpatient bed. This study examines factors associated with the likelihood of hospital admission for ED patients with behavioral health conditions at 16 hospital-based EDs in a large urban area in the southern United States. METHODS: Using Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Service Use for guidance, the study examined the relationship between predisposing (characteristics of the individual, i.e., age, sex, race/ethnicity), enabling (system or structural factors affecting healthcare access), and need (clinical) factors and the likelihood of hospitalization following ED visits for behavioral health conditions (n = 28,716 ED visits). In the adjusted analysis, a logistic fixed-effects model with blockwise entry was used to estimate the relative importance of predisposing, enabling, and need variables added separately as blocks while controlling for variation in unobserved hospital-specific practices across hospitals and time in years. RESULTS: Significant predisposing factors associated with an increased likelihood of hospitalization following an ED visit included increasing age, while African American race was associated with a lower likelihood of hospitalization. Among enabling factors, arrival by emergency transport and a longer ED LOS were associated with a greater likelihood of hospitalization while being uninsured and the availability of community-based behavioral health services within 5 miles of the ED were associated with lower odds. Among need factors, having a discharge diagnosis of schizophrenia/psychotic spectrum disorder, an affective disorder, a personality disorder, dementia, or an impulse control disorder as well as secondary diagnoses of suicidal ideation and/or suicidal behavior increased the likelihood of hospitalization following an ED visit. CONCLUSION: The block of enabling factors was the strongest predictor of hospitalization following an ED visit compared to predisposing and need factors. Our findings also provide evidence of disparities in hospitalization of the uninsured and racial and ethnic minority patients with ED visits for behavioral health conditions. Thus, improved access to community-based behavioral health services and an increased capacity for inpatient psychiatric hospitals for treating indigent patients may be needed to improve the efficiency of ED services in our region for patients with behavioral health conditions. Among need factors, a discharge diagnosis of schizophrenia/psychotic spectrum disorder, an affective disorder, a personality disorder, an impulse control disorder, or dementia as well as secondary diagnoses of suicidal ideation and/or suicidal behavior increased the likelihood of hospitalization following an ED visit, also suggesting an opportunity for improving the efficiency of ED care through the provision of psychiatric services to stabilize and treat patients with serious mental illness.

Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of a Web-Based Intervention to Promote Healthy Eating, Physical Activity and Meaningful Social Connections Compared with Usual Care Control in People of Retirement Age Recruited from Workplaces.

BACKGROUND: Lifestyle interventions delivered during the retirement transition might promote healthier ageing. We report a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a web-based platform (Living, Eating, Activity and Planning through retirement; LEAP) promoting healthy eating (based on a Mediterranean diet (MD)), physical activity (PA) and meaningful social roles. METHODS: A single blinded, two-arm RCT with individual allocation. Seventy-five adult regular internet users living in Northeast England, within two years of retirement, were recruited via employers and randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive LEAP or a 'usual care' control. Intervention arm participants were provided with a pedometer to encourage self-monitoring of PA goals. Feasibility of the trial design and procedures was established by estimating recruitment and retention rates, and of LEAP from usage data. At baseline and 8-week follow-up, adherence to a MD derived from three 24-hour dietary recalls and seven-day PA by accelerometry were assessed. Healthy ageing outcomes (including measures of physiological function, physical capability, cognition, psychological and social wellbeing) were assessed and acceptability established by compliance with measurement protocols and completion rates. Thematically analysed, semi-structured, qualitative interviews assessed acceptability of the intervention, trial design, procedures and outcome measures. RESULTS: Seventy participants completed the trial; 48 (96%) participants in the intervention and 22 (88%) in the control arm. Participants had considerable scope for improvement in diet as assessed by MD score. LEAP was visited a median of 11 times (range 1-80) for a mean total time of 2.5 hours (range 5.5 min- 8.3 hours). 'Moving more', 'eating well' and 'being social' were the most visited modules. At interview, participants reported that diet and PA modules were important and acceptable within the context of healthy ageing. Participants found both trial procedures and outcome assessments acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The trial procedures and the LEAP intervention proved feasible and acceptable. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of LEAP to promote healthy lifestyles warrant evaluation in a definitive RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02136381.

Effectiveness of nonnarcotic protocol for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic nonmalignant pain.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is a growing problem. Frequent visits for chronic pain are a significant subset of patients. The use of narcotics in these patients is controversial. The purpose of this study was to test a strict nonnarcotic protocol in reducing need for and number of ED visits for chronic pain while at the same time addressing their pain. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study. We identified patients with more than 10 ED visits for exacerbations of chronic nonmalignant pain in the last 12 calendar months. Each patient and their physician were sent letters informing them of the concern of frequent ED use and the use of opioids for rescue therapy. Furthermore, the patient would receive medications other than narcotics in subsequent ED visits, and follow-up with the primary physician for alternatives was encouraged. Use of the ED for pain-related visits was then monitored for the subsequent 12-month period. Clinic use and outpatient medication uses were also monitored. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were identified for the initial study. These patients averaged 19 ED visits per 12 months for pain-related complaints. All of them had a regular physician. After notification of the new protocol, ED visits decreased to an average of 2 visits per year. Visits with primary care physicians also dropped from an average of 19 visits per year to 7 visits. There were 7 patients who had been weaned off narcotic medications, 4 who had been converted to methadone maintenance, and 1 who had been switched to a fentanyl patch. CONCLUSIONS: Initiation of a strict nonnarcotic protocol for treatment of patients with frequent ED visits for chronic nonmalignant pain results in a significant drop in the number of pain-related visits to the ED. These visits were not offset by a significant elevation in the number of clinic visits for pain complaints, and many were weaned off narcotics. Nonnarcotic protocols for acute exacerbations of chronic nonmalignant pain may be a viable alternative for reducing frequent pain-related ED visits in a select population.

The HCL-32: towards a self-assessment tool for hypomanic symptoms in outpatients.

BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorders (BP) are frequently diagnosed and treated as pure depression initially; accurate diagnosis often being delayed by 8 to 10 years. In prospective studies, the presence of hypomanic symptoms in adolescence is strongly predictive of later bipolar disorders. As such, an instrument for self-assessment of hypomanic symptoms might increase the detection of suspected and of manifest, but under-treated, cases of bipolar disorders. METHODS: The multi-lingual hypomania checklist (HCL-32) has been developed and is being tested internationally. This preliminary paper reports the performance of the scale in distinguishing individuals with BP (N=266) from those with major depressive disorder (MDD; N=160). The samples were adult psychiatry patients recruited in Italy (N=186) and Sweden (N=240). RESULTS: The samples reported similar clinical profiles and the structure for the HCL-32 demonstrated two main factors identified as "active/elated" hypomania and "risk-taking/irritable" hypomania. The HCL-32 distinguished between BP and MDD with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 51%. LIMITATIONS: Although the HCL-32 is a sensitive instrument for hypomanic symptoms, it does not distinguish between BP-I and BP-II disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Future studies should test if different combinations of items, possibly recording the consequences of hypomania, can distinguish between these BP subtypes.