RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Symptoms of depersonalization (DP) and derealization (DR) are a risk factor for more severe impairment, non-response to various treatments, and a chronic course. In this study, we investigated the effects of DP/DR symptoms in patients with clinically significant depressive symptoms on clinical characteristics and various outcomes in a representative population-based sample with a 5-year follow-up. METHODS: The middle-aged sample comprised n = 10,422 persons at baseline, of whom n = 9,301 were free from depressive and DP/DR symptoms. N = 522 persons had clinically significant depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 10) and co-occurring DP/DR symptoms, and n = 599 persons had clinically significant depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 10) without DP/DR symptoms. RESULTS: There were substantial health disparities between persons with and without depression. These disparities concerned a wide range of life domains, including lower quality of the recalled early life experiences with the parents, current socioeconomic status, social integration (partnership, loneliness), current social and interpersonal stressors (family, work), functional bodily complaints (e.g., tinnitus, migraine, chest pain), unhealthy lifestyle, and the prevalence of already developed physical diseases. These disparities persisted to the 5-year follow-up and were exceptionally severe for depressed persons with co-occurring DP/DR symptoms. Among the depressed persons, the co-occurrence of DP/DR symptoms more than doubled the risk for recurrence or persistence of depression. Only 6.9% of depressed persons with DP/DR symptoms achieved remission at the 5-year follow-up (PHQ-9 < 5). Depression with and without co-occurring DP/DR worsened self-rated physical health significantly. The impact of depression with co-occurring DP/DR on the worsening of the self-rated physical health status was stronger than those of age and major medical diseases (e.g., heart failure). However, only depression without DP/DR was associated with mortality in a hazard regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, and lifestyle. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that DP/DR symptoms represent an important and easily assessable prognostic factor for the course of depression and health outcomes. Given the low remission rates for depression in general and depression with DP/DR in particular, efforts should be made to identify and better support this group, which is disadvantaged in many aspects of life.
Assuntos
Despersonalização , Depressão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Humanos , Depressão/complicações , Depressão/epidemiologia , Despersonalização/epidemiologia , Despersonalização/diagnóstico , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Questionário de Saúde do PacienteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The EQ-5D and the SF-6D are examples of commonly used generic preference-based instruments for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, their suitability for mental disorders has been repeatedly questioned. OBJECTIVE: To assess the responsiveness and convergent validity of the EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D in patients with depressive symptoms. METHODS: The data analyzed were from cardiac patients with depressive symptoms and were collected as part of the SPIRR-CAD (Stepwise Psychotherapy Intervention for Reducing Risk in Coronary Artery Disease) trial. The EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D were compared with the HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire) as disease-specific instruments. Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation. Effect sizes were calculated and ROC analysis was performed to determine responsiveness. RESULTS: Data from 566 patients were analysed. The SF-6D correlated considerably better with the disease-specific instruments (|rs|= 0.63-0.68) than the EQ-5D-3L (|rs|= 0.51-0.56). The internal responsiveness of the SF-6D was in the upper range of a small effect (ES: - 0.44 and - 0.47), while no effect could be determined for the EQ-5D-3L. Neither the SF-6D nor the EQ-5D-3L showed acceptable external responsiveness for classifying patients' depressive symptoms as improved or not improved. The ability to detect patients whose condition has deteriorated was only acceptable for the EQ-5D-3L. CONCLUSION: Overall, both the convergent validity and responsiveness of the SF-6D are better than those of the EQ-5D-3L in patients with depressive symptoms. The SF-6D appears, therefore, more recommendable for use in studies to evaluate interventions for this population.
Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Depressão , Inquéritos e Questionários , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Little is known on optimal screening population for detecting new atrial fibrillation (AF) in the community. We describe characteristics and estimate cost-effectiveness for a single timepoint electrocardiographic screening. METHODS: We performed a 12-lead ECG in the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study between 2007 and 2012 (n=15 010), mean age 55±11 years, 51% men and collected more than 120 clinical and biomarker variables, including N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (Nt-proBNP), risk factors, disease symptoms and echocardiographic variables. RESULTS: Of 15 010 individuals, 466 (3.1%) had AF. New AF was found in 32 individuals, 0.2% of the total sample, 0.5% of individuals aged 65-74 years and predominantly men (86%). The classical risk factor burden was high in individuals with new AF. The median estimated stroke risk was 2.2%/year, while risk of developing heart failure was 21% over 10 years. In the 65-74 year age group, the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained resulting from a single timepoint screening was 30 361. In simulations, the costs were highly sensitive to AF detection rates, proportion of treatment and type of oral anticoagulant. Prescreening by Nt-proBNP measurements was not cost-effective in the current setting. CONCLUSIONS: In our middle-aged population cohort, we identified 0.2% new AF by single timepoint screening. There was a significant estimated risk of stroke and heart failure in these individuals. Cost-effectiveness for screening may be reached in individuals aged 65 years and older. The simple age cut-off is not improved by using Nt-proBNP as a biomarker to guide a screening programme.
Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Adulto , Idoso , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Biomarcadores , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peptídeo Natriurético Encefálico , Fragmentos de Peptídeos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controleRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic status (SES) has a strong association with depression or physical and mental health in general. However, as SES is a multifaceted construct these associations are not easy to explain. Further, there are several indicators and many studies only investigating two or less indicators at the same time. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the cross-sectional and longitudinal association of three defined SES dimensions (education, occupational position and household net-income) with the occurrence of elevated symptoms of depression relative to the impact of important covariates. METHODS: The study included observational data from 12,484 participants of the Gutenberg Health Study. The outcome was "elevated depressive symptoms" as defined by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) ≥ 2 at the 2.5-year follow-up. Regression coefficients were adjusted for baseline covariates (age, sex, partnership, depression, anxiety, medical history of depressive or anxiety disorder and major medical diseases (MMD)) in addition to SES sum score and the three single indicators. We further examined interaction terms of the SES with sex, partnership and major medical diseases. We analyzed the sample stratified by elevated depressive symptoms at baseline, as we expected different trajectories in both subgroups. RESULTS: SES, education and household net-income were lower in the group of persons with PHQ-2 ≥ 2 at baseline, and they predicted the occurrence of PHQ-2 ≥ 2 at 2.5 year follow-up in the group of persons without elevated depressive symptoms at baseline after multivariable adjustment (SES: Odds Ratio (OR) 0.96, 0.95-0.98, p < 0.0001; education: OR 0.96, 0.93-0.99, p = 0.036; household net-income: OR 0.96, 0.92-0.99, p = 0.046) but not in the group of persons with elevated depressive symptoms at baseline. Further, we found that the impact of major medical diseases on the development of elevated depressive symptoms was buffered by high income. In addition, living in a partnership buffered the impact of a low occupational position. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding the SES, the dimensions education and household net-income seem to play the most important role for socioeconomic inequalities in persons in Mid-West Germany with depressive symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Reference no. 837.020.07; original vote: 22.3.2007, latest update: 20.10.2015.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Escolaridade , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Classe Social , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bearing in mind the multicultural background of a national population, little is known about the measurement invariance across different cultures or ethnicities of frequently used screeners for depression. For this reason, the main objective of the current study is to assess the measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) across groups with different migration backgrounds. METHODS: We provided psychometric analyses (descriptive statistics at item and scale level, reliability analysis, exploratory [EFA] and confirmatory factor analyses [CFA]) comparing a native population with first- and second-generation migrants of the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study with N = 13,973 participants completing the PHQ-9. Furthermore, we conducted measurement invariance analyses among different groups of first-generation migrants. RESULTS: Comparing the native population with first- and second-generation migrants, a higher prevalence for mental distress was found for first generation. Although mean score patterns were similar for all groups, analyses of item loadings among first-generation migrants yielded some variance in patterns pointing out that certain items have a distinct impact on depression for specific groups. With regard to the factorial validity for all groups, EFA and CFA provided evidence for the proposed one latent factor structure of the PHQ-9. Depression assessed by the PHQ-9 turned out to be equivalent from a psychometric perspective across different groups stratified by their migration background. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, results of thorough scale and item analyses, especially multigroup confirmatory analyses, provided support that depression, assessed by the PHQ-9, can be considered as psychometrically equivalent across all analyzed groups.
Assuntos
Cultura , Depressão/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Questionário de Saúde do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Depressão/etnologia , Transtorno Depressivo/etnologia , Feminino , Alemanha/etnologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Questionário de Saúde do Paciente/normas , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
Aim of the study was the development and validation of the psychometric properties of a six-item bi-factorial instrument for the assessment of social support (emotional and tangible support) with a population-based sample. A cross-sectional data set of N = 15,010 participants enrolled in the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS) in 2007-2012 was divided in two sub-samples. The GHS is a population-based, prospective, observational single-center cohort study in the Rhein-Main-Region in western Mid-Germany. The first sub-sample was used for scale development by performing an exploratory factor analysis. In order to test construct validity, confirmatory factor analyses were run to compare the extracted bi-factorial model with the one-factor solution. Reliability of the scales was indicated by calculating internal consistency. External validity was tested by investigating demographic characteristics health behavior, and distress using analysis of variance, Spearman and Pearson correlation analysis, and logistic regression analysis. Based on an exploratory factor analysis, a set of six items was extracted representing two independent factors. The two-factor structure of the Brief Social Support Scale (BS6) was confirmed by the results of the confirmatory factor analyses. Fit indices of the bi-factorial model were good and better compared to the one-factor solution. External validity was demonstrated for the BS6. The BS6 is a reliable and valid short scale that can be applied in social surveys due to its brevity to assess emotional and practical dimensions of social support.
Assuntos
Emoções , Apoio Social , Adulto , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Alemanha , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Personalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Depersonalization (DP) involves unpleasant experiences of detachment from one's sense of self or unreality in the environment. DP may occur in a broad range of conditions, among healthy persons due to sleep loss, drug induced, secondary to anxiety disorders or primary in depersonalization disorder. Although DP has an early age of onset, little is known about the prevalence and correlates of DP among adolescents. METHODS: Between January and June 2011, we conducted a questionnaire-based representative survey of pupils aged 12-18 years in the federal state Rhineland-Palatinate of Germany. The final sample comprised 3,809 pupils. We analyzed the prevalence of depersonalization and its correlates regarding sociodemographic characteristics, substance abuse, global mental distress and resilience factors. RESULTS: One-third of the sample showed severe global mental distress, and 11.9 % were in the range of clinically significant depersonalization. Depersonalized students were less often living with both parents (67.3 vs. 75.7 %), came more often from an disadvantaged socioeconomic background, had a very severe level of global mental distress (comparable to psychiatric inpatients), were more often smoking and abusing cannabis and they suffered from specific impairments regarding social insecurity, global self-efficacy and active coping abilities. CONCLUSIONS: Experiences of depersonalization were very common among adolescents and may indicate an increased risk for poor academic achievement and mental health in the long term. Prospective studies are needed to investigate the course and clinical relevance of depersonalization for the development of the adolescents.
Assuntos
Despersonalização/epidemiologia , Fumar/epidemiologia , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Criança , Comorbidade , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Fumar Maconha , Saúde Mental , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , EstudantesRESUMO
Patients with mental disorders have an increased risk for somatic diseases. Especially life style risk factors contribute to this increased risk. In order to identify targets for preventive measures, we aimed to determine the prevalence of an unhealthy lifestyle in a clinical sample and to analyze associations with severity of mental disorders and somatic complaints. We analyzed the medical records of n=1 919 outpatients, who were treated between 2009-2011 in the Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy of the University Medical Center Mainz. 62.4% of the patients were physically inactive, 33.2% were smokers and 17.4% were obese. Lifestyle risk factors were associated with increased symptom burden and impairment. Smoking was strongly associated with more previous psychiatric or psychosomatic inpatient treatments. These results indicate an urgent need for targeting health behavior more rigorously in the treatment of patients with common mental disorders.
Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Estilo de Vida , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Psiquiatria , Transtornos Psicofisiológicos/psicologia , Transtornos Psicofisiológicos/terapia , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/psicologia , Comportamento Sedentário , Fumar/psicologia , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Adulto JovemRESUMO
This study investigated the association of depersonalization (DP) experiences with dizziness and its impact on subjective impairment and health care use. Trained interviewers surveyed a representative sample of 1287 persons using standardized self-rating questionnaires on dizziness, DP, and mental distress. Symptoms of dizziness were reported by 15.8% (n = 201). Thereof, 62.7% endorsed at least one symptom of DP, 40% reported impairment by symptoms of DP, and 8.5% reported clinically significant DP. Regression analyses identified DP as a significant, independent predictor for dizziness symptom severity, health care use, and impairment by dizziness. With regard to the Vertigo Symptom Scale, DP explained 34.1% (p < 0.001) of the variance for severity of symptoms of dysfunction in the balance system. In conclusion, symptoms of DP, highly prevalent in patients complaining of dizziness and vertigo, were independently associated with increased impairment and health care use. The presence of DP symptoms should actively be explored in patients complaining of dizziness.
Assuntos
Despersonalização/epidemiologia , Tontura/epidemiologia , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Vertigem/epidemiologia , Adulto , Depressão/epidemiologia , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Fóbicos/epidemiologia , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Análise de Regressão , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recently, the two item version of the Cambridge Depersonalization Scale (CDS-2) has been validated in a clinical sample and has demonstrated that it is a useful tool for the detection of clinically significant depersonalization (DP). In order to provide a framework for the interpretation of the CDS-2 scores the aim of this study was to achieve normative data of a representative sample of the German population and to evaluate the associations with depression, anxiety and sociodemographic characteristics. METHODS: A nationally representative face-to-face household survey was conducted during the mid of 2009 in Germany. The sample comprised N = 2512 participants. The survey questionnaire consisted of the CDS-2, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Case level of DP was found for 3.4% of the participants without significant sex and age differences. Although DP was strongly associated with depression and anxiety, principal component analysis clearly supported the distinctiveness of the psychopathological syndromes of depression, anxiety and DP. LIMITATIONS: A criterion standard diagnostic interview for DP, anxiety and depression was not included. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide a framework for the interpretation of the CDS-2 scores and support the view that DP is a common and distinct psychopathological syndrome.
Assuntos
Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Despersonalização/diagnóstico , Depressão/diagnóstico , Inventário de Personalidade , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Ansiedade/psicologia , Comorbidade , Despersonalização/epidemiologia , Despersonalização/psicologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/psicologia , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inventário de Personalidade/normas , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos de Amostragem , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The survey aimed to investigate the prevalence of depersonalization (DP) experiences, its sociodemographic characteristics and its associations with medical conditions, illness behavior, and potential etiologic factors. A representative face-to-face household survey was conducted. The sample consists of n = 1,287 participants aged 14 to 90 years. Sociodemographic variables, medical conditions, current mental disorders, health care utilization, and childhood adversities were assessed. A total of 1.9% participants scored in the range of clinically significant DP (DP-C) and 9.7% reported at least some impairment through DP (DP-I). DP-C/DP-I were strongly associated with depression and anxiety. After adjustment for depression and anxiety, DP-C and DP-I were independently associated with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic pulmonary disease, severe pain, and childhood adversities. We conclude that DP is common, it can not be reduced to a negligible variant of depression or anxiety and that more awareness about DP with respect to detection and research is urgently required.
Assuntos
Despersonalização/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Sobreviventes Adultos de Maus-Tratos Infantis/psicologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Despersonalização/diagnóstico , Despersonalização/psicologia , Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Comportamento de Doença , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade , Prevalência , Probabilidade , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study is to investigate the applicability of the German adaptation of the Dissociative Experiences Scale, the "Fragebogen zu dissoziativen Symptomen (FDS)", for research on depersonalization (DP) and derealization (DR), and to elucidate the phenomenology of DP / DR. METHODS: 101 consecutively recruited inpatients were diagnosed with the German version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders for depersonalization/derealization. Furthermore, the FDS and the SCL-90-R were administered. RESULTS: 47 of 101 Patients were diagnosed with pathological DP / DR. The mean score of the DES scale of the FDS was 32.00 +/- 15.52. A cut-off score of 17.5 for the DES scale of the FDS yielded a 83.0 % sensitivity and 77.8 % specificity. Depressive disorders, anxiety disorders and trauma-associated disorders were the most common comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The findings are comparable to the Anglo-American samples. The FDS was found to be quite effective for screening of DP / DR. The three-factor solution of the FDS was not well supported in this sample.