PSMA PET/CT for Response Assessment of 177Lu-PSMA Therapy.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT has been widely integrated into the management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical recurrence, is increasingly used for initial staging in high-risk patients prior to surgery or to identify candidates for PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT). To date, monitoring response in PCa patients in prospective studies remains the domain of conventional imaging, such as magnetic resonance/CT or bone scintigraphy. With the increasing use of PSMA-targeted PET/CT in PCa, however, varying criteria based on molecular imaging have been established to define progressive disease, including "PSMA PET Progression Criteria," "Response evaluation criteria in PSMA PET/CT (RECIP 1.0)" or consensus statements of respective societies. In the present review, we will discuss the current status of PSMA PET/CT for response monitoring, focusing on PSMA RLT with [177Lu]Lu-labeled PSMA ligands, along with a head-to-head comparison of recently published response criteria.

Prognostic Value of Tumor Volume Assessment on PSMA PET After 177Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy Evaluated by PSMA PET/CT Consensus Statement and RECIP 1.0.

Quantitative evaluation of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting PET/CT remains challenging but is urgently needed for the use of standardized PET-based response criteria, such as the PSMA PET/CT consensus statement or Response Evaluation Criteria in PSMA PET/CT (RECIP 1.0). A recent study evaluated the prognostic value of whole-body tumor volume using a semiautomatic method relying on a 50% threshold of lesion SUVmax (PSMATV50). In the present study, we analyzed the suitability of this approach comparing 18F-PSMA-1007 with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans and the potential of PSMATV50 for the prediction of overall survival (OS) in patients before 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT). Moreover, PSMATV50 was integrated into the PSMA PET/CT consensus statement as well as RECIP 1.0, and the prognostic value of these response classification systems was compared. Methods: This retrospective study included 70 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer undergoing PSMA RLT. Thirty-three patients were monitored by 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, and 37 patients by 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. PET/CT scans before (baseline) and at the end of PSMA RLT after 2-4 cycles (follow-up) were separately analyzed by 2 readers. PSMATV50 at baseline and its change at the time of follow-up (ΔPSMATV50, expressed as a ratio) were correlated with OS using Cox proportional-hazards regression. The results of both subgroups were compared. The integration of ΔPSMATV50 in existing response classification systems was evaluated. To assess and compare the discriminatory strength of these classification systems, Gönen and Heller concordance probability estimates were calculated. Results: PSMATV50 determination was technically feasible in all examinations. A higher PSMATV50 at baseline and a higher ΔPSMATV50 were strongly associated with a shorter OS for both 68Ga-PSMA-11 (PSMATV50: hazard ratio [HR] of 1.29 [95% CI, 1.05-1.55], P = 0.009; ΔPSMATV50: HR of 1.83 [95% CI, 1.08-3.09], P = 0.024) and 18F-PSMA-1007 (PSMATV50: HR of 1.84 [95% CI, 1.13-2.99], P = 0.014; ΔPSMATV50: HR of 1.23 [95% CI, 1.04-1.51], P = 0.03). Response assessment provided high discriminatory power for OS for the PSMA PET/CT consensus statement (concordance probability estimate, 0.73) as well as RECIP 1.0 (concordance probability estimate, 0.74). Conclusion: PSMATV50 and ΔPSMATV50 proved to be predictive of OS not only for 68Ga-PSMA-11 but also for 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT scans. Subsequent integration of ΔPSMATV50 into the PSMA PET/CT consensus statement and RECIP 1.0 provided equally high prognostic value for both classification systems.

Determination of whole-body tumour burden on [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT for response assessment of [177Lu]PSMA-617 radioligand therapy: a retrospective analysis of serum PSA level and imaging derived parameters before and after two cycles of therapy.

AIM: In patients with metastasized castration-resistant prostate cancer a reliable imaging-based therapy response assessment in addition to PSA kinetics is desirable. Recently, measurements of whole-body tumour burden by [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT have been reported for response assessment in oligometastasic patients. The present study investigated the association of PSMA PET derived parameters and serum PSA level before and after [177Lu]PSMA-617 radioligand therapy (RLT). METHODS: This retrospective study assessed whole-body PSMA tumour volume (PSMA-TV) in 10 patients with multifocal to diffuse metastases before and after 2 cycles of RLT using volume of interest (VOI) analysis. A standardized uptake value (SUV) threshold-based approach was used to semi-automatically delineate all voxels with a SUV ≥ 2.0 g/ml using the software ROVER® (ABX Radeberg, Germany). Voxels with physiological tracer uptake (e. g. kidneys) were excluded manually. Correlations between PSMA-TV and serum PSA level before and after two cycles of RLT as well as changes thereof (ΔPSMA-TV and ΔPSA, respectively) were calculated. RESULTS: Changes of ΔPSMA-TV and ΔPSA were concordant in 7 of 10 patients. Whereas a good correlation was found between PSMA-TV and PSA before RLT (ρ = 0.81, p = 0.0049), this correlation was attenuated after RLT (ρ = 0.64, p = 0.0479). Consequently, no association was found between ΔPSMA-TV and ΔPSA (ρ = 0.39, p = 0.26). CONCLUSION: The attenuation of the correlation of PSA and PSMA-TV after RLT suggests that in patients with advanced disease the comparison of imaging based parameters such as PSMA-TV and PSA level might be useful for an adequate monitoring of treatment response.