A Rabbit Femoral Condyle Defect Model for Assessment of Osteochondral Tissue Regeneration.

Osteochondral tissue repair represents a common clinical need, with multiple approaches in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine being investigated for the repair of defects of articular cartilage and subchondral bone. A full thickness rabbit femoral condyle defect is a clinically relevant model of an articulating and load bearing joint surface for the investigation of osteochondral tissue repair by various cell-, biomolecule-, and biomaterial-based implants. In this protocol, we describe the methodology and 1.5- to 2-h surgical procedure for the generation of a reproducible, full thickness defect for construct implantation in the rabbit medial femoral condyle. Furthermore, we describe a step-by-step procedure for osteochondral tissue collection and the assessment of tissue formation using standardized histological, radiological, mechanical, and biochemical analytical techniques. This protocol illustrates the critical steps for reproducibility and minimally invasive surgery as well as applications to evaluate the efficacy of cartilage and bone tissue engineering implants, with emphasis on the usage of histological and radiological measures of tissue growth. Impact statement Although multiple surgical techniques have been developed for the treatment of osteochondral defects, repairing the tissues to their original state remains an unmet need. Such limitations have thus prompted the development of various constructs for osteochondral tissue regeneration. An in vivo model that is both clinically relevant and economically practical is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of different tissue engineered constructs. In this article, we present a full thickness rabbit femoral condyle defect model and describe the analytical techniques to assess the regeneration of osteochondral tissue.

Assessment methodologies for extrusion-based bioink printability.

Extrusion-based bioprinting is one of the leading manufacturing techniques for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Its primary limitation is the lack of materials, known as bioinks, which are suitable for the bioprinting process. The degree to which a bioink is suitable for bioprinting has been described as its 'printability.' However, a lack of clarity surrounding the methodologies used to evaluate a bioink's printability, as well as the usage of the term itself, have hindered the field. This article presents a review of measures used to assess the printability of extrusion-based bioinks in an attempt to assist researchers during the bioink development process. Many different aspects of printability exist and many different measurements have been proposed as a consequence. Researchers often do not evaluate a new bioink's printability at all, while others simply do so qualitatively. Several quantitative measures have been presented for the extrudability, shape fidelity, and printing accuracy of bioinks. Different measures have been developed even within these aspects, each testing the bioink in a slightly different way. Additionally, other relevant measures which had little or no examples of quantifiable methods are also to be considered. Looking forward, further work is needed to improve upon current assessment methodologies, to move towards a more comprehensive view of printability, and to standardize these printability measurements between researchers. Better assessment techniques will naturally lead to a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms which affect printability and better comparisons between bioinks. This in turn will help improve upon the bioink development process and the bioinks available for use in bioprinting.