RESUMO
We conducted a study to analyze hospital and patient costs, outcomes, and patient satisfaction among adults undergoing in-office and operating room procedures for the treatment of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Our final study population was made up of 17 patients-1 man and 16 women, aged 30 to 86 years (mean: 62). The mean number of in-office laser procedures per patient was 4.2, and the mean interval between procedures was 5.4 months (although 10 patients underwent only 1 office procedure); the mean number of operating room procedures was 13.5, and the mean interval between procedures was 14.3 months. An equal number of patients reported complications or adverse events with the two types of procedures-5 each. The difference in cost between the office procedure (mean: $3,413.00) and the operating room procedure (mean: $12,382.59) was almost $9,000, but these savings were offset by the fact that the office procedures needed to be performed three times as often. Patients reported slightly more anxiety and discomfort during the office procedures and, overall, they appeared to prefer the operating room procedure. We conclude that office procedures are significantly more cost-effective than operating room procedures, but their use may be limited by patient tolerance and the increased frequency of the procedure.
Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Salas Cirúrgicas/economia , Papiloma/cirurgia , Consultórios Médicos/economia , Neoplasias do Sistema Respiratório/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , RecidivaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the variables that contribute to repeated patient non-compliance with showing up to clinic appointments. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Single tertiary care academic institution. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients who did not show up to 3 or more clinic appointments in the otolaryngology department in the Henry Ford Health System in metro Detroit, Michigan between July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012 area were compared to control patients randomly chosen from those who had appointments on the same day with the same provider as the no-show patients. RESULTS: 105 patients were identified who no-showed to 3 or more clinic appointments. Younger age, black race, and lower income were all found to be significant factors for patients missing appointments in a multiple variate model. On logistic regression, Medicaid insurance, closer distance from home to appointment, less bus transfers, and less time by bus travel were also found to correlate with no-showing. CONCLUSION: Age, race, and income are significantly related to patient non-compliance with clinic appointments. Paradoxically, proximity to the clinical appointment location is also significantly related - we hypothesize this may be the result of significant income inequality in the metro Detroit population distribution. Follow up studies include analyzing factors that precluded patient access and interventions to improve compliance and decrease cost.