Physician Reimbursement: From Fee-for-Service to MACRA, MIPS and APMs.

To a significant degree, "healthcare reform" is a movement to change how both physicians and healthcare facilities are compensated, with value replacing volume as the key compensation metric. The goal of this movement has not yet been accomplished, but the process is accelerating. In this article, we track how the arc of physician compensation is bending, how the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act will drive further changes to physician compensation models, and how these changes may affect physician practice patterns and physician staffing in the future.

The Medical Profession's Future: A Struggle Between Caring For Patients And Bottom-Line Pressures.

In this issue of Health Affairs, Lawrence Casalino and coauthors establish that physicians in common specialty practices spend an average of 2.6 hours per week dealing with external quality measures. This gives rise to general questions about the future of the medical profession. To what extent will quality-tracking requirements and similar practice intrusions reshape who physicians are, how many physicians there are, and how they practice? In turn, how will these changes affect patients' access to care? Data derived from the 2014 Survey of America's Physicians: Practice Patterns and Perspectives, conducted by Merritt Hawkins on behalf of the Physicians Foundation, make it clear that physician practice patterns are evolving. Responding to an increasingly intrusive practice environment, physicians report that they will choose a variety of practice models likely to reduce patients' access to care or that they will retire early, which will exacerbate the physician shortage and fundamentally change the nature of the medical profession.

The Economic Role of Physicians in Today's Evolving Healthcare System.

Physicians provide millions of patients with essential medical care each year on which a dollar value cannot be placed. However, the economic role physicians play in healthcare delivery can be calibrated. According to a new Merritt Hawkins survey indicating net annual revenue generated by physicians for their affiliated hospitals, and according to data indicating the economic contributions physicians make to their communities, this role remains highly significant. Even as payment models transition from volume-based metrics to value-based metrics, the economic role of physicians in healthcare will remain pivotal.

The U.S. presidential election and health care workforce policy.

The candidates for the 2008 presidential election have offered a range of proposals that could bring significant changes in health care. Although few are aimed directly at the nurse and physician workforce, nearly all of the proposals have the potential to affect the health care workforce. Furthermore, the success of the proposed initiatives is dependent on a robust nurse and physician workforce. The purpose of this article is to outline the current needs and challenges for the nurse and physician workforce and highlight how candidates' proposals intersect with the adequacy of the health care workforce. Three general themes are highlighted for their implications on the physician and nurse workforce supply, including (a) expansion of health care coverage, (b) workforce investment, and (c) cost control and quality improvement.

An empirical investigation of quality improvement initiatives in for-profit and not-for-profit hospitals: environmental, competitive and outcome concerns.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to shed some light on quality improvement practices of for-profit and not-for-profit hospitals DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The scope and effectiveness of several quality improvement efforts are studied for a sample of 110 hospitals. Factor analysis was utilized to analyze the data collected. FINDINGS: The results of this study tended to suggest that for-profit and not-for-profit hospitals were more similar than different with the regard to the effective utilization of quality improvement initiatives, thus underscoring the utility of quality improvement efforts despite differences in operating characteristics, strategies and operating constraints. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The sample used in this study is limited. Thus, the results should be interpreted accordingly. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: This study offers decision-makers in healthcare operational settings empirical evidence of the operational and strategic effectiveness of different quality improvement efforts, thus justifying investments related to the initiation and implementation of such quality improvement efforts. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This study represents an important step toward understanding the effective implementation of quality improvement initiatives in different operational settings.