[Quantitative assessment of fungal risk in the case of construction works in healthcare establishments: Proposed indicators for the determination of the impact of management precautions on the risk of fungal infection]. / Appréciation quantitative du risque fongique en cas de travaux en établissements de santé : propositions d'indicateurs d'impact des mesures de gestion du risque infectieux fongique.

Construction works in healthcare establishments produce airborne fungal spores and considerably increase the risk of exposure of immunosuppressed patients. It is necessary to reinforce protective measures, or even to implement specific precautions, during this critical phase. The aim of these precautions is to protect both those areas, which are susceptible to dust, and patients at risk of a fungal infection particularly invasive aspergillosis. When construction works are planned in healthcare establishments, the first step consists in the characterisation of the environmental fungal risk and the second one in proposing risk management methods. It is then essential to establish impact indicators in order to evaluate the risk management precautions applied. The working group promoted by the French societies of medical mycology and hospital hygiene (SFMM & SF2H) details here both environmental and epidemiological impact indicators that can be used.

Comparative assessment of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blot for the diagnosis of toxocariasis in patients with skin disorders.

Background The link between various chronic skin disorders and toxocariasis was previously demonstrated by case reports and several case-control studies. However, these previous studies were based only on the Toxocara canis excretory-secretory-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (TES-ELISA) serological technique, which is not specific due to cross-reactivity with parasites of the genera Anisakis or Ascaris. Immunoblot analysis is highly specific and can detect very low levels of Toxocara antibodies. Therefore, this technique may be useful in the identification of Toxocara infection in patients with chronic skin disorders. Objectives Because urticaria and pruritus/prurigo are skin conditions previously associated with toxocariasis, we carried out a prospective study using both TES-ELISA and Toxocara Western blot on 113 patients with either chronic urticaria (n = 84) or chronic pruritus (n = 29). Methods Patients were matched with controls according to gender, age and residence location (rural or urban area). Data were analysed using a Mantel-Haenszel chi(2) test. Results The proportion of positive TES-ELISA results was not significantly different for patients with chronic skin disorders (urticaria or pruritus/prurigo) from that of control subjects. However, the proportion of positive immunoblot results was significantly higher for patients with chronic urticaria than for control subjects (P = 0.009). Conclusions Our study demonstrates the need to perform Western blotting immunodiagnosis, whatever the TES-ELISA result, to improve diagnosis of human toxocariasis in patients with chronic urticaria caused by Toxocara infection.