Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool-Thai Version: Translation, Validity, and Reliability.

BACKGROUND: In 2019, 14.0% of infants in Thailand were exclusively breastfed up to 6 months of age. To increase exclusive breastfeeding, an objective assessment measure would be useful to maternity care providers for appraising the problems encountered by new mothers' experiences with breastfeeding. RESEARCH AIMS: To translate the Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool from English into Thai; to assess the reliability and validity of the Thai Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool; and to explore the relationship of a mother's self-efficacy to successful breastfeeding. METHODS: Using a methodological design, we purposively sampled 302 new mothers from two tertiary hospitals in Thailand who had given birth to a single baby with an uncomplicated vaginal birth. The Thai Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool's structure was examined using confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent and convergent validity were assessed using the Thai LATCH instrument and Thai Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale, respectively. RESULTS: The inter-item Thai Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool correlation coefficients were positive and strong. The correlation between scores of the Thai Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool and Thai LATCH instrument were positive and strong and had acceptable concurrent validity. The confirmatory factor analysis model fit the Thai Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool data perfectly and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient had acceptable internal reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The Thai Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool is a cross-culturally translated instrument equivalent to its English version and demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability. The instrument provides a mechanism for an objective assessment and monitoring system of optimal breastfeeding practices in Thai mothers with newborns.

Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale - Thai Version: Translation and Assessment of Psychometric Properties Among Psychiatric Outpatients in Central Thailand.

This paper reports the translation of the English Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness scale into Thai and assessment of its psychometric properties. After forward- and backward-translation, Thai experts completed the content validity index with item agreements of .86 to 1.00. Data were collected from 390 psychiatric clinic patients in central Thailand using systematic random sampling. Unweighted least squares factor analysis with Promax rotation identified five subscales. Cronbach's alpha for scale reliability was .88, and correlations for construct validity ranged from r=.55 to .69. These findings support the validity and reliability of the Thai version of the scale.

Evaluation of online and on-site options for master's degree and post-master's certificate programs.

Measures related to program evaluation were selected to compare on-site and online options of a master's and post-master's nursing program. Although some differences were found in student-related outcomes, the decision to continue the online options was based on program and organizational effectiveness. The decline in the number of on-site students has been offset by the expanding enrollments of online students and their national distribution. Increased costs were associated with offering online courses.

Primary reasons for ED visits and procedures performed for patients who saw nurse practitioners.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known, from a national perspective, about what types of patients are seen by nurse practitioners in the emergency department. METHODS: Data from 1545 participating emergency departments across the United States during 1997, 1998, 1999, and 2000 were collected from nationally representative samples of urban and rural hospitals using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys. Results Nurse practitioners saw 5.76 million ED patients during the 4-year period. Using the Reason for Visit Classification developed by the National Center for Health Statistics, the primary category for patients seen by nurse practitioners was classified as "Injury by type and/or location." The types of injuries in this category were lacerations and cuts to an upper extremity and facial area; injuries to the head, neck, and face; and foreign bodies in the eye. The next most common category was classified under "General symptoms." Nurse practitioners saw patients in this category with symptoms of chest pain, side or flank pain, fever, and edema. DISCUSSION: The findings from this study provide insight into the types of patient visits seen by nurse practitioners in emergency departments in the United States and the services and procedures that were received by patients.