Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
ANZ J Surg ; 93(3): 636-642, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36203387

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Defunctioning loop ileostomies (DLIs) are a frequent adjunct to rectal cancer surgery. Delayed closure of DLIs is common and associated with increased morbidity. The reasons for delayed DLI closure are often unknown. The economic burden of delayed DLI closure is not quantified. The present study aimed to determine the reasons for, and economic burden of, delayed DLI closure. METHODS: Clinical and economic data were audited from a prospective database of patients in two Australasian colorectal cancer centres. Patients treated at each unit with low/ultra-low anterior resection for rectal cancer with formation of DLI between January 2014 and December 2019 were included. Post-operative complication rate, stoma-related complication rate and costs of hospital admissions and stoma care were recorded and analysed. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to investigate risk factors for delay to closure. RESULTS: 146 patients underwent low/ultra-low anterior resection with DLI; 135 patients (92.5%) underwent reversal. The median duration to reversal was 7 months (IQR 4.5-9.5). Sixty-six percent of patients underwent reversal >6 months after their index surgery. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with delayed reversal (P < 0.001). Non-English speakers waited longer for DLI closure (P = 0.028). The costs of outpatient stoma care (P < 0.001), post-operative care (P = 0.004), and total cost of treatment (P = 0.014) were significantly higher in the delayed closure group, with a total cost of treatment difference of $3854 NZD per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Causes of delay include systemic factors and demographic factors that can be addressed directly, addressing such causes may alleviate a significant economic burden.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Retais , Estomas Cirúrgicos , Humanos , Ileostomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Retais/complicações , Estomas Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Reto/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 62(5): 631-637, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30543534

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prolonged postoperative ileus is a common major complication after abdominal surgery. Retrospective data suggest that ileus doubles the cost of inpatient stay. However, current economic impact data are based on retrospective studies that rely on clinical coding to diagnose ileus. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the economic burden of ileus for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. DESIGN: Economic data were audited from a prospective database of patients who underwent surgery at Auckland City Hospital between September 2012 and June 2014. SETTINGS: Auckland City Hospital is a large tertiary referral center, using an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. PATIENTS: Patients were prospectively diagnosed with prolonged postoperative ileus using a standardized definition. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The cost of inpatient stay was analyzed with regard to patient demographics and operative and postoperative factors. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine the cost of ileus when accounting for other significant covariates. RESULTS: Economic data were attained from 325 patients, and 88 patients (27%) developed ileus. The median inpatient cost (New Zealand dollars) for patients with prolonged ileus, including complication rates and length of stay, was $27,981 (interquartile range= $20,198 to $42,174) compared with $16,317 (interquartile range = $10,620 to $23,722) for other patients, a 71% increase in cost (p < 0.005). Ileus increased all associated healthcare costs, including medical/nursing care, radiology, medication, laboratory costs, and allied health (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that ileus remained a significant financial burden (p < 0.005) when considering rates of major complications and length of stay. LIMITATIONS: This is a single-institution study, which may impact the generalizability of our results. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged ileus causes a substantial financial burden on the healthcare system, in addition to greater complication rates and length of stay in these patients. This is the first study to assess the financial impact of prolonged ileus, diagnosed prospectively using a standardized definition. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A825.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitalização/economia , Íleus/economia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Intestinais/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colectomia , Colostomia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , Humanos , Ileostomia , Intestino Delgado/cirurgia , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Nova Zelândia , Protectomia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA