Cancer incidence estimation at a district level without a national registry: a validation study for 24 cancer sites using French health insurance and registry data.

BACKGROUND: District-level cancer incidence estimation is an important issue in countries without a national cancer registry. This study aims to both evaluate the validity of district-level estimations in France for 24 cancer sites, using health insurance data (ALD demands--Affection de Longue Durée) and to provide estimations when considered valid. Incidence is estimated at a district-level by applying the ratio between the number of first ALD demands and incident cases (ALD/I ratio), observed in those districts with cancer registries, to the number of first ALD demands available in all districts. These district-level estimations are valid if the ratio does not vary greatly across the districts or if variations remain moderate compared with variations in incidence rates. METHODS: Validation was performed in the districts covered by cancer registries over the period 2000-2005. The district variability of the ALD/I ratio was studied, adjusted for age (mixed-effects Poisson model), and compared with the district variability in incidence rate. The epidemiological context is also considered in addition to statistical analyses. RESULTS: District-level estimation using the ALD/I ratio was considered valid for eight cancer sites out of the 24 studied (lip-oral cavity-pharynx, oesophagus, stomach, colon-rectum, lung, breast, ovary and testis) and incidence maps were provided for these cancer sites. CONCLUSION: Estimating cancer incidence at a sub-national level remains a difficult task without a national registry and there are few studies on this topic. Our validation approach may be applied in other countries, using health insurance or hospital discharge data as correlate of incidence.

Breast cancer incidence using administrative data: correction with sensitivity and specificity.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate breast cancer incidence in the general population using a method that corrects for lack of sensitivity and specificity in the identification of incident breast cancer in inpatient claims data. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTINGS: Two-phase study: phase 1 to identify incident cases in claims data, and phase 2 to estimate sensitivity and specificity in a subset of the population. Two algorithms (1: principal diagnosis; 2: principal diagnosis+specific surgery procedures) were used to identify incident cases in claims of women aged 20 years or older, living in a French district covered by a cancer registry. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated in one district and used to correct incident cases identified. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity for algorithms 1 and 2 were 69.0% and 99.89%, and 64.4% and 99.93%, respectively. In contrast to specificity, the sensitivity for both algorithms was lower for women younger than 40 years and older than 65 years. Cases reported by cancer registries were closer to cases identified with algorithm 2 (-3.2% to +20.1%) and to corrected numbers with algorithm 1 (-1% to +15%). CONCLUSION: To obtain reliable estimates of breast cancer incidence in the general population, sensitivity and specificity, which reflect medical and coding practice variations, are necessary.