Objective assessment of internal stress in children during dental treatment by analysis of autonomic nervous activity.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the internal stress of children during dental treatment based on autonomic nerve activity and facial muscle activity. METHODS: We recorded the electrocardiogram of children during the treatment of composite resin restoration and analysed autonomic nerve activity by means of power spectral analysis of heart rate variability. Simultaneously, electromyography (EMG) activity of the corrugator muscle was recorded in children during dental treatment, and the relationship between sympathetic nerve activity and corrugator EMG activity was analysed. RESULTS: In all subjects, the mean sympathetic nerve activity was significantly higher during oral examination and after treatment compared with pre-treatment. Depending on the sympathetic nerve responses to the other treatment procedures, the subjects could be classified into two groups: the stress group and the nonstress group. Sympathetic nerve activity was significantly higher during infiltration anaesthesia and cavity preparation compared with pre-treatment activity in the stress group, whereas it was consistently lower than the pre-treatment levels during most treatment procedures in the nonstress group. The mean amplitudes of the averaged corrugator muscle EMG during dental treatment did not differ between the stress and nonstress groups. CONCLUSION: The present results suggest that the measurement of autonomic nervous activity, especially sympathetic nervous activity, is quite useful in assessing the internal stress of children, even when no expressed sign of unease are present during dental treatment.

[Incident and accident reports in Tokyo Medical and Dental University Dental Hospital (FY 2001-2002)].

In 2002, the Dental Hospital of Tokyo Medical and Dental University set up a working group for risk management. This working group analyzed 225 incident and accident reports submitted to the hospital in 2001 and 2002. Each report was analyzed with regard to "type," "place," "reporter," "severity," and "cause" in order to diagnose hospital safety and prevent future incidents and accidents. The cause of incidents and accidents was analyzed using the SHEL model, where S stands for Software, H for Hardware, E for Environment, and L for Liveware. The severity of the consequence was classified into 6 levels, where level 0 = "error not applied," level 1 = "not affected," level 2 = "watch and see or additional test," level 3 = "treatment," level 4 = "aftereffect," and level 5 = "death." The incidents and accidents judged to have potentially high risk were given a score of "+H," irrespective of the level. The results of the analyses revealed that most of the incidents and accidents happened in "wards," "operation rooms," and "oral surgery clinics." This is probably because the incident and accident reporting system is well established by nurses working in these clinics. Additional analysis revealed that most of the reports were written and submitted by nurses. The frequencies of "treatment procedure," "misuse of dental instruments," "mis-prescription," "falling down" and "needlestick" related incidents and accidents were the highest and were caused mainly by L and S. There were only 3 accidents above level 4, however, less severe cases were given a score of +H due to the high potential risk involved.