Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 30(5): 657-666, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662945

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Health departments nationally are critically understaffed and lack infrastructure support. By examining current staffing and allocations through a Foundational Public Health Services (FPHS) lens at the Northern Nevada Public Health (NNPH), there is an opportunity to make a strong case for greater investment if current dedicated full-time equivalents are inadequate and to guide which investments in public health workforce are prioritized. OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of the Public Health Workforce Calculator (calculator) and other tools to identify and prioritize FPHS workforce needs in a field application. DESIGN: Field application of the calculator in conjunction with the use of FPHS workforce capacity self-assessment tools. SETTING: NNPH. PARTICIPANTS: NNPH and Public Health Foundation (PHF). INTERVENTION: From June 2022 through April 2023, PHF collaborated with NNPH, serving Washoe County, to provide expertise and assistance as NNPH undertook an assessment of its workforce needs based upon the FPHS model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of the calculator output with FPHS workforce capacity self-assessment tools. RESULTS: The calculator and the FPHS capacity self-assessment process yielded complementary FPHS workforce capacity gap data. The use of a structured and transparent process, coupled with additional tools that included prioritizing needs, provided a viable and sustainable process for public health workforce investment planning. NNPH successfully utilized the results to bolster a supplemental funding request and a state public health appropriation. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the calculator and an FPHS workforce capacity self-assessment in a facilitated and structured process such as that used by NNPH to identify staffing priorities may hold promise as an approach that could be used to support decision-making and justification for infrastructure resources when funding for public health increases in the future.


Assuntos
Saúde Pública , Nevada , Humanos , Saúde Pública/métodos , Autoavaliação (Psicologia) , Mão de Obra em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos Humanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos Humanos/normas , Investimentos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Investimentos em Saúde/tendências
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA