Discrepancy between the quantitative ultrasound value of Malaysian men and the manufacturer's reference and the impact on classification of bone health status.

The local normative value in quantitative ultrasound (QUS) equipment needs to be established for wider application and accurate classification of patients into respective fracture risk groups. The present study aimed to establish the calcaneal speed of sound (SOS) value for Chinese and Malay men in Malaysia and determine the difference between calcaneal SOS of the local population and the reference values provided by the manufacturer for each age group. This study will also determine the effect of using the manufacturer's young adult (20-29yr) reference or the local young adult reference to classify the subjects into the respective risk groups. Eight hundred forty Malay and Chinese men residing in central peninsular Malaysia were recruited and their calcaneal QUS value was determined using the CM-200 machine (Furuno Electric, Nishinomiya City, Japan). The results showed that the differences in SOS values between Chinese and Malay men were not significant across all the age groups studied (p>0.05). The age-dependent reduction of SOS value assumed a biphasic form, which was evident at 30-39yr and older than 60yr. The calcaneal SOS of the subject under study was significantly higher as compared with the manufacturer's reference (based on Japanese population) in all groups aged 40yr and older (p<0.05). A significant proportion of the subjects in the osteoporosis group was misclassified using the manufacturer's young adult reference as compared with using the local young adult reference (p<0.05). In conclusion, the overall normative value of SOS obtained was suitable for Chinese and Malay men in Malaysia, and a local reference value should be applied to avoid misclassification of subjects into the respective risk groups.

Using primary care prescribing databases for pharmacovigilance.

AIMS: In the UK, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are responsible for over 6.5% of all hospital admissions, representing a significant morbidity and cost burden to the health service. We aimed to develop an ADR monitoring system capable of identifying the reasons for patient discontinuation of drug therapy within 6 months of the index prescription. METHODS: Patients first prescribed amlodipine between 1 March 2004 and 28 February 2007 who discontinued their amlodipine medication within 6 months of the index prescription were identified from the practice team information (PTI) database. Once identified, reasons for amlodipine discontinuation were assessed by an electronic database search using relevant Readcodes and key words and by a direct approach to the primary care medical records. RESULTS: The PTI database identified 995 patients [61.4% females, mean age 65.9 years (SD 12.4 years)] who discontinued amlodipine within 6 months of an index prescription. An electronic search of the database, using Readcodes, identified that 19.4% (193) of patients who discontinued their medication had an ADR recorded in the database. Six (20%) of 30 participating primary care practices, contributing to the PTI database, agreed to be approached directly and supply the reasons for discontinuation for the 51 patients identified as having discontinued amlodipine in their practices. Completed data were returned for all 51 patients, 98% of whom discontinued amlodipine due to an ADR or adverse drug event. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm that primary care prescribing databases can be easily used to identify the frequency and nature of ADRs occurring in an ADR-enriched population identified through medication discontinuation.