Evaluation of the performance and clinical impact of a rapid intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay in conjunction with preoperative imaging and concise parathyroidectomy.

BACKGROUND: (99m)Tc-sestamibi scans and rapid, intraoperative intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) assays allow preoperative identification of diseased glands and intraoperative confirmation of diseased gland removal, respectively. Use of these two new technologies may facilitate simpler, more concise surgery, shorter hospital stays, and decreased costs for frozen-section analysis. One major drawback to this new strategy has been the high cost of rapid point-of-care PTH assays. METHODS: We performed rapid PTH assays with the DPC Turbo PTH assay on the DPC IMMULITE automated analyzer. The number of intraoperative frozen sections, type of anesthesia, surgical approach, length of hospital stay, and pre- and postoperative calcium values were compared between a group of 49 patients undergoing parathyroidectomy where the intraoperative PTH assay was used in conjunction with preoperative imaging, and a historical control group of 55 patients before the use of these two technologies in our institution. RESULTS: Comparison of the Turbo PTH assay to the standard IMMULITE PTH assay gave the following: y = 1.08 x - 4.36 (r = 0.97; n = 48). For the 49 patients, the median turnaround time for each intraoperative PTH determination was 19 min (range, 14-40 min). The median decrease in PTH values from baseline was 88% (range, 33-99%). Thirty-seven patients required two PTH determinations, 7 required three, 4 had four, and 1 required five determinations. The average laboratory cost for the rapid intraoperative PTH assays was < $100 per patient (range, $55 to $113). Compared with the control group, the experimental group had significantly fewer frozen sections (1.4 vs 2.5; P < 0.0001), shorter hospital stays (17 discharged on the day of surgery vs none discharged on the day of surgery; P < 0.0001), greater use of local anesthesia (33% vs 0%; P < 0.001), and more unilateral, rather than bilateral neck explorations (65% vs 0%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of intraoperative Turbo PTH assay and preoperative (99m)Tc-sestamibi scans can lead to significant decreases in laboratory and surgical pathology costs, hospital stays, and exposure to general anesthesia by facilitating concise parathyroidectomy surgery.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy compared to open adrenalectomy for benign adrenal neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy has recently been used for removing a variety of adrenal neoplasms. The purpose of the present study was to compare results and outcomes in patients who underwent either laparoscopic or open adrenalectomy at our institution from 1988 to the present. STUDY DESIGN: The records of 66 consecutive patients with benign adrenal neoplasms who underwent adrenalectomy from 1988 through 1995 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups based on the operative approach: group I (n = 25), open anterior transabdominal approach; group II (n = 17), open posterior retroperitoneal approach; and group III (n = 24), laparoscopic transabdominal flank approach. Various parameters were compared and statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: The three groups were similar in age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and distribution of unilateral compared with bilateral adrenalectomy. Mean tumor size was slightly larger in group I (3.4 +/- 1.4 cm) than in group II (2.4 +/- 1.4 cm) or group III (2.7 +/- 1.4 cm) (p = NS). Mean operative times for unilateral adrenalectomy were 142 +/- 38 minutes in group I, 136 +/- 34 minutes in group II, and 183 +/- 35 minutes in group III (p < 0.001, groups I and II compared with group III). For bilateral adrenalectomy, mean operative times were 205 +/- 71 minutes (group I), 328 +/- 11 minutes (group II), and 422 +/- 77 minutes (group III). Patients who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy had significantly less operative blood loss (mean, 104 mL compared to 408 mL in group I and 366 mL in group II, p < 0.001) and a lower incidence of perioperative blood transfusion. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy was also associated with significantly reduced parenteral pain medication requirements (p < or = 0.001) and more rapid resumption of a regular diet (p < or = 0.01) compared to open adrenalectomy. Postoperative length of stay was significantly longer in group I (8.7 +/- 4.5 days) and in group II (6.2 +/- 3.9 days) after open adrenalectomy than after laparoscopic adrenalectomy (3.2 +/- 0.9 days) (p < 0.01). Total hospital charges were similar for groups II and III but somewhat higher for group I. Patients were able to resume 100 percent activity an average of 10.6 +/- 4.9 days after laparoscopic adrenalectomy and returned to work a mean of 16.0 +/- 6.1 days postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is a safe and effective procedure and has several advantages over open adrenalectomy. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy should become the preferred operative approach for the treatment of patients with small, benign adrenal neoplasms.

Home parenteral nutrition for patients with advanced intraperitoneal cancers and gastrointestinal dysfunction.

The use of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in patients with advanced, untreatable cancer is controversial. Occasionally, however, damage to bowel by tumor, radiation, or surgery renders these patients unable to eat and TPN may be indicated to prevent premature death from starvation. We have used Home Parenteral Nutrition (HPN) to support three patients with advanced, untreatable abdominal cancer and inability to eat. Morbidity was minimal and survival times were 24, 6 and 1.5 months. Payment was covered by third party agencies. All patients and their families were gratified by the ability to return home with nutritional support. HPN can be used to support terminal cancer patients with bowel obstruction and may afford them longer survival. Ideally, patients considered for this should be well motivated, with good support systems, and with survival estimated to be at least months.