Athlete health and safety at large sporting events: the development of consensus-driven guidelines.

All sport events have inherent injury and illness risks for participants. Healthcare services for sport events should be planned and delivered to mitigate these risks which is the ethical responsibility of all sport event organisers. The objective of this paper was to develop consensus-driven guidelines describing the basic standards of services necessary to protect athlete health and safety during large sporting events. By using the Knowledge Translation Scheme Framework, a gap in International Federation healthcare programming for sport events was identified. Event healthcare content areas were determined through a narrative review of the scientific literature. Content experts were systematically identified. Following a literature search, an iterative consensus process was undertaken. The outcome document was written by the knowledge translation expert writing group, with the assistance of a focus group consisting of a cohort of International Federation Medical Chairpersons. Athletes were recruited to review and provide comment. The Healthcare Guidelines for International Federation Events document was developed including content-related to (i) pre-event planning (eg, sport medical risk assessment, public health requirements, environmental considerations), (ii) event safety (eg, venue medical services, emergency action plan, emergency transport, safety and security) and (iii) additional considerations (eg, event health research, spectator medical services). We developed a generic standardised template guide to facilitate the planning and delivery of medical services at international sport events. The organisers of medical services should adapt, evaluate and modify this guide to meet the sport-specific local context.

Health promotion by International Olympic Sport Federations: priorities and barriers.

OBJECTIVE: To identify changes in International Federations' priorities and the barriers to implementing athlete and global health initiatives. Results should influence the work of the International Federation medical committees, the IOC and the Association of Summer Olympic International Federation. METHODS: The 28 Summer and 7 Winter International Federations participating in the most recent Olympic Games (2016; 2018) were surveyed to (i) identify the importance of 27 health topics, (ii) assess their progress on implementation health-related programmes and (iii) the barriers to implementation of these programmes. We compared International Federations' activities in 2016 and 2017. RESULTS: The response rate was 83%. Health topics which most International Federations regarded as important and in which the International Federations felt insufficiently active were 'team physician certification', 'prevention of harassment and abuse', 'eating disorders/disordered eating', 'mental health' and 'injury surveillance'. Compared with 2016, there was a decrease in International Federations' activities in 'injury surveillance', 'nutritional supplements' and 'hyperandrogenism'. The main barrier to implementing health-related programmes was 'International Federation political support/willingness', followed by 'knowledge'. 'Time' and 'coach support' were more often reported than 'finances', or 'IOC or Association of Summer Olympic International Federations partnership'. CONCLUSION: If International Federations are going to promote health of athletes and global health promotion through physical activity (sport), International Federation leadership must change their focus and provide greater political support for related initiatives. Improving coach and athlete knowledge of the health issues could also facilitate health programme delivery. Time constraints could be mitigated by sharing experiences among the International Federations, Association of Summer Olympic International Federations and the IOC. International Federations should focus on those health-related topics that they identified as being important, yet rate as having insufficient activity.

Cost of gestational diabetes mellitus in the United States in 2007.

The objective of this study was to estimate the national medical costs associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in 2007. We analyzed the National Hospital Discharge Survey to estimate the national prevalence of GDM. Using Poisson regression analysis with medical claims for about 27,000 newborns and their mothers, we estimated rate ratios that reflect the increase in use of health care services associated with GDM. Combining GDM prevalence rates with these rate ratios, we calculated etiological fractions that reflect the proportion of national health care resource use associated with GDM. We then multiplied these fractions by estimates of national health care use and costs in 2007. GDM prevalence increases with age, rising from 1.3% of pregnancies of women younger than age 21 to 8.7% of pregnancies of women older than age 35. For the estimated 180,000 GDM pregnancies resulting in delivery, average expenditures increased $3,305 per pregnancy plus $209 in the newborn's first year of life. GDM increased national medical costs by $636 million in 2007-$596 million for maternal costs and $40 million for neonatal costs. Approximately $230 million (36%) of GDM-related medical costs are covered by government programs (primarily Medicaid), $355 million (56%) are covered by private insurers, and $51 million (8%) are covered by self-pay and charity care. GDM imposes a significant economic burden. These estimates of the economic burden of GDM are likely conservative because we focus on near-term medical costs, omitting the increased risk for long-term sequelae.