[Establishment of Mono-scaled Benefit/Risk Analysis of HPV Vaccine].

Decisions concerning approval of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines and their use are based on expert evaluation of the vaccines. However, the quantitative differences between vaccine benefits and risks are difficult for non-experts to understand. In this study, we developed a new method to calculate the benefits and risks of the HPV vaccines using disability-adjusted life year (DALY) as the mono-scaled weight for various benefits and risks relevant to the vaccines. We evaluated benefits as a gain of DALY values for cervical cancer and risks as the loss of DALY values for various adverse events by the vaccination. To calculate the loss of DALY values, we integrated all adverse events in the International Classification of Diseases chapters. The novel method reflected the men-women ratio of this epidemiological disease to a certain extent. Among the vaccinated women, 111372 and 477190 received a bivalent and quadrivalent vaccine, respectively. The DALY rate of cervical cancer was 148.7. The calculated benefit for the bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines was 149.1 and 638.8, respectively, and set as the theoretical maximum. The risk was calculated as 129.3 and 49.6 in the bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines, respectively. Since HPV vaccines prevent several other cancers, the benefit of the vaccination extends beyond the risk according to this new method.

Novel effective and repeatedly available ring-thread counter traction for safer colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND: Although several methods to create an effective counter traction for safer endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) have been reported, these methods do not overcome problems regarding delivery and ease of use. This randomized prospective study assessed the usefulness of ring-shaped thread counter traction, which not only allowed the safer colorectal ESD but also the easiest and lower cost counter traction without any special devices. METHODS: Forty-five patients diagnosed with colorectal lateral spreading tumors over 20 mm were allocated to the conventional ESD group (CE) (n = 22) and the ring-shaped thread counter traction ESD group (RE) (n = 21). The ring-shaped thread was hooked and lifted up to the contralateral mucosa with a hemoclip. The primary outcome was the dissected area per minute during ESD (cm2/min) (UMIN000020160). RESULTS: There were significant differences in the dissection time (min), with 130.0 (56.0-240.0) versus 80 (35.0-130.0) min for the CE and RE groups, respectively (P = 0.001). For the dissected areas per minute (cm2/min), there was a significant difference, with 0.125 (0.1-0.18) versus 0.235 (0.16-0.36) min (P = 0.003) for the CE and RE groups, respectively. There were 1 cases of perforation during ESD in the CE compared to 0 for the RE, and this was no significantly different (P = 0.31). The procedure time of producing and setting the ring-shaped thread counter traction was approximately 1.80 (0.80-3.30) min only. CONCLUSIONS: The ring-shaped thread counter traction is simple, effective, lower cost and does not require special devices to obtain repeated counter traction.

Review of Pure Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract.

Natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using flexible endoscopy has attracted attention as a minimally invasive surgical method that does not cause an operative wound on the body surface. However, minimizing the number of devices involved in endoscopic, compared to laparoscopic, surgeries has remained a challenge, causing endoscopic surgeries to gradually be phased out of use. If a flexible endoscopic full-thickness suturing device and a counter-traction device were developed to expand the surgical field for gastrointestinal-tract collapse, then endoscopic full-thickness resection using NOTES, which is seen as an extension of endoscopic submucosal dissection for full-thickness excision of tumors involving the gastrointestinal-tract wall, might become an extremely minimally invasive surgical method that could be used to resect only full-thickness lesions approached by the shortest distance via the mouth. It is expected that gastroenterological endoscopists will use this surgery if device development is advanced. This extremely minimally invasive surgery would have an immeasurable impact with regard to mitigating the burden on patients and reducing healthcare costs. Development of a new surgical method using a multi-purpose flexible endoscope is therefore considered a socially urgent issue.

Suitable closure for post-duodenal endoscopic resection taking medical costs into consideration.

AIM: To compare closure methods, closure times and medical costs between two groups of patients who had post-endoscopic resection (ER) artificial ulcer floor closures. METHODS: Nineteen patients with duodenal adenoma, early duodenal cancer, and subepithelial tumors that received ER between September 2009 and September 2014 at Kagawa University Hospital and Ehime Rosai Hospital, an affiliated hospital of Kagawa University, were included in the study. We retrospectively compared two groups of patients who received post-ER artificial ulcer floor closure: the conventional clip group vs the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) group. Delayed bleeding, procedure time of closure, delayed perforation, total number of conventional clips and OTSCs and medical costs were analyzed. RESULTS: Although we observed delayed bleeding in three patients in the conventional clip group, we observed no delayed bleeding in the OTSC group (P = 0.049). We did not observe perforation in either group. The mean procedure times for ulcer closure were 33.26 ± 12.57 min and 9.71 ± 2.92 min, respectively (P = 0.0001). The resection diameters were 18.8 ± 1.30 mm and 22.9 ± 1.21 mm for the conventional clip group and the OTSC group, respectively, with significant difference (P = 0.039). As for medical costs, the costs of all conventional clips were USD $1257 and the costs of OTSCs were $7850 (P = 0.005). If the post-ER ulcer is under 20 mm in diameter, a conventional clip closure may be more suitable with regard to the prevention of delayed perforation and to medical costs. CONCLUSION: If the post-ER ulcer is over 20 mm, the OTSC closure should be selected with regard to safety and reliable closure even if there are high medical costs.