Sex Differences in Long-Term Outcomes With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Mild Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown conflicting results regarding the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by sex and QRS duration. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT), we evaluated long-term clinical outcome of heart failure (HF) or death, death, and HF alone by sex and QRS duration (dichotomized at 150 ms) in left bundle-branch block patients with CRT with defibrillator backup (CRT-D) versus implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) only. There were 394 women (31%) and 887 men with left bundle-branch block. During the median follow-up of 5.6 years, women derived greater clinical benefit from CRT-D compared with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator only, with a significant 71% reduction in HF or death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.29, P<0.001) and a 77% reduction in HF alone (HR 0.23, P<0.001) compared with men, who had a 41% reduction in HF or death (HR 0.59, P<0.001) and a 50% reduction in HF alone (HR 0.50, P<0.001) (all sex-by-treatment interaction P<0.05). Men and women had similar reduction in long-term mortality with CRT-D versus implantable cardioverter-defibrillator only (men: HR 0.70, P=0.03; women: HR 0.59, P=0.04). The incremental benefit of CRT-D in women for HF or death and HF alone was consistent with QRS <150 or >150 ms. CONCLUSIONS: During long-term follow-up of mild HF patients with left ventricular dysfunction and wide QRS, both women and men with left bundle-branch block derived sustained benefit from CRT-D versus implantable cardioverter-defibrillator only, with significant reduction in HF or death, HF alone, and all-cause mortality regardless of QRS duration. There is an incremental benefit with CRT-D in women for the end points of HF or death and HF alone. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifiers: NCT00180271, NCT01294449, and NCT02060110.

Sex Differences in Device Therapies for Ventricular Arrhythmias or Death in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Studies suggest that women with ischemic heart disease are less likely to experience appropriate ICD therapies for ventricular arrhythmias (VT/VF). We evaluated the influence of sex on arrhythmic events or death in subjects enrolled in MADIT-CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Arrhythmic event rates, defined as VT/VF treated with defibrillator therapy or all-cause death, were determined among 1,790 subjects enrolled in MADIT-CRT with documented 3-year follow-up. Predictors of VT/VF/death were identified using multivariate analysis. Ninety-one (21%) women and 466 (35%) men experienced VT/VF/death over the follow-up period. The overall probability of VT/VF/death was significantly lower in women versus men (HR 0.62; P < 0.001). The probability of VT/VF/death was the lowest in women with ischemic heart disease (HR 0.51; P = 0.003). In ICD subjects, the 3-year risk of VT/VF was lower in ischemic women versus men (P = 0.021), and in nonischemic women versus men (P = 0.049). The probability of VT/VF/death was significantly lower in women (HR 0.52; P = 0.007) and men (HR 0.74; P = 0.018) with LBBB who received CRT-D. Appropriate shock therapy strongly correlated with increased risk of death during postshock follow-up in women (HR 5.18; P = 0.001) and men (HR 1.63; P = 0.033); interaction P value of 0.034. CONCLUSION: In this substudy of MADIT-CRT, sex, etiology of heart disease and type of device implanted significantly influenced subsequent risk for VT/VF or death. Women with ischemic heart disease and women with LBBB who received CRT-D had the lowest incidence of VT/VF or death when compared to men. Appropriate shock therapy was a strong predictor of death, particularly in women.

Association between myocardial substrate, implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks and mortality in MADIT-CRT.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess a possible association between myocardial substrate, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks, and subsequent mortality. METHODS: Within the multicentre automatic defibrillator implantation trial-cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT) population (n = 1790), we investigated the association between myocardial substrate, ICD shocks and subsequent mortality using multivariate Cox regression analyses and landmark analyses at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: The 4-year cumulative probability of ICD shocks was 13% for appropriate shock and 6% for inappropriate shock. Compared with patients who never received ICD therapy, patients who received appropriate shock had an increased risk of mortality [HR = 2.3 (1.47-3.54), P < 0.001], which remained increased after adjusting for echocardiographic remodelling at 1 year (HR = 2.8, P = 0.001). Appropriate anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) only was not associated with increased mortality (P = 0.42). We were not able to show an association between inappropriate shocks (P = 0.53), or inappropriate ATP (P = 0.10) and increased mortality. Advanced myocardial structural disease, i.e. higher baseline echocardiographic volumes and lack of remodelling at 1 year, was present in patients who received appropriate shocks but not in patients who received inappropriate shocks or no shocks. CONCLUSION: In the MADIT-CRT study, receiving appropriate ICD shocks was associated with an increased risk of subsequent mortality. This association was not evident for appropriate ATP only. These findings, along with advanced cardiac structural disease in the patients who received appropriate shocks, suggest that the compromised myocardium is a contributing factor to the increased mortality associated with appropriate ICD shock therapy. Clinical trials.gov identifier: NCT00180271.

Risk stratification for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy: the role of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator.

The benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy depends upon appropriate evaluation of a persisting risk of sudden death and estimation of the patient's overall survival. Assessment of a stable and unchangeable arrhythmogenic substrate is often difficult. Structural abnormality and ventricular dysfunction, the two major risk parameters, may recover, and heart failure symptoms can improve so that ICD therapy may not be indicated. Risk stratification can take time while the patient continues to be at high risk of arrhythmic death, and patients may need temporary bridging by a defibrillator in cases of interrupted ICD therapy. The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) combines a long-term electrocardiogram (ECG)-monitoring system with an external automatic defibrillator. The LIfeVest® (ZOLL, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) is composed of a garment, containing two defibrillation patch electrodes on the back, and an elastic belt with a front-defibrillation patch electrode and four non-adhesive ECG electrodes, connected to a monitoring and defibrillation unit. The WCD is a safe and effective tool to terminate ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation events, unless a conscious patient withholds shock delivery. It may be used in patients in the early phase after acute myocardial infarction with poor left ventricular function, after acute coronary revascularization procedures (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (≤35%), in patients with acute heart failure in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy of uncertain aetiology and prognosis. The WCD may be helpful in subjects with syncope of assumed tachyarrhythmia origin or in patients with inherited arrhythmia syndromes. The WCD may replace ICD implantation in patients waiting for heart transplantation or who need a ventricular-assist device. This review describes the technical details and characteristics of the WCD, discusses its various potential applications, and reports the currently available experience with the wearable defibrillator.

Cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in the MADIT-CRT trial.

BACKGROUND: The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial demonstrated that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) when added to the implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) reduces risk of heart failure or death in minimally symptomatic patients with reduced cardiac ejection fraction and wide QRS complex. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate 4-year cost-effectiveness of CRT-ICD compared to ICD alone using MADIT-CRT data. RESEARCH DESIGN: Patients enrolled in the trial were randomized to implantation of either ICD or CRT-ICD in a 2:3 ratio, with up to 4-year follow-up period. Cost-effectiveness analyses were conducted, and sensitivity analyses by age, gender, and left bundle branch block (LBBB) conduction pattern were performed. SUBJECTS: A total of 1,271 patients with ICD or CRT-ICD (US centers only) who reported healthcare utilization and health-related quality of life data. MEASURES: We used the EQ-5D (US weights) to assess patient HRQOL and translated utilization data to costs using national Medicare reimbursement rates. RESULTS: Average 4-year healthcare expenditures in CRT-ICD patients were higher than costs of ICD patients ($62,600 vs 57,050, P = 0.015), mainly due to the device and implant-related costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CRT-ICD compared to ICD was $58,330/quality-adjusted life years (QALY) saved. The cost effectiveness improved with longer time horizon and for the LBBB subgroup ($7,320/QALY), with no cost-effectiveness benefit being evident in the non-LBBB group. CONCLUSIONS: In minimally symptomatic patients with low ejection fraction and LBBB, CRT-ICD is cost effective within 4-year horizon when compared to ICD-only.

In silico cardiac risk assessment in patients with long QT syndrome: type 1: clinical predictability of cardiac models.

OBJECTIVES: The study was designed to assess the ability of computer-simulated electrocardiography parameters to predict clinical outcomes and to risk-stratify patients with long QT syndrome type 1 (LQT1). BACKGROUND: Although attempts have been made to correlate mutation-specific ion channel dysfunction with patient phenotype in long QT syndrome, these have been largely unsuccessful. Systems-level computational models can be used to predict consequences of complex changes in channel function to the overall heart rhythm. METHODS: A total of 633 LQT1-genotyped subjects with 34 mutations from multinational long QT syndrome registries were studied. Cellular electrophysiology function was determined for the mutations and introduced in a 1-dimensional transmural electrocardiography computer model. The mutation effect on transmural repolarization was determined for each mutation and related to the risk for cardiac events (syncope, aborted cardiac arrest, and sudden cardiac death) among patients. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that mutation-specific transmural repolarization prolongation (TRP) was associated with an increased risk for cardiac events (35% per 10-ms increment [p < 0.0001]; ≥upper quartile hazard ratio: 2.80 [p < 0.0001]) and life-threatening events (aborted cardiac arrest/sudden cardiac death: 27% per 10-ms increment [p = 0.03]; ≥upper quartile hazard ratio: 2.24 [p = 0.002]) independently of patients' individual QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc). Subgroup analysis showed that among patients with mild to moderate QTc duration (<500 ms), the risk associated with TRP was maintained (36% per 10 ms [p < 0.0001]), whereas the patient's individual QTc was not associated with a significant risk increase after adjustment for TRP. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that simulated repolarization can be used to predict clinical outcomes and to improve risk stratification in patients with LQT1, with a more pronounced effect among patients with a lower-range QTc, in whom a patient's individual QTc may provide less incremental prognostic information.

Sex-related differences in patients' responses to heart failure therapy.

Men and women with heart failure display important differences in clinical characteristics that might affect their responses to pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies. In women, heart failure is associated with a higher frequency of hypertension, nonischemic cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block than in men. Subgroup analyses of data from randomized clinical trials suggest that these differences result in a differential response to heart failure therapies, including a somewhat better response to ß-blockers, a worse prognosis with digoxin therapy, and a lower survival benefit with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in women. Importantly, female patients with heart failure also derive significantly greater improvements in cardiac volumes from cardiac resynchronization therapy than do male patients, and this treatment is associated with reduced risks of all-cause mortality and heart failure events among women with mild symptoms. These data suggest that sex-related differences might exist in response to both medical and device therapies for patients with heart failure.

Combined assessment of sex- and mutation-specific information for risk stratification in type 1 long QT syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Men and women with type 1 long QT syndrome (LQT1) exhibit time-dependent differences in the risk for cardiac events. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that sex-specific risk for LQT1 is related to the location and function of the disease-causing mutation in the KCNQ1 gene. METHODS: The risk for life-threatening cardiac events (comprising aborted cardiac arrest [ACA] or sudden cardiac death [SCD]) from birth through age 40 years was assessed among 1051 individuals with LQT1 (450 men and 601 women) by the location and function of the LQT1-causing mutation (prespecified as mutations in the intracellular domains linking the membrane-spanning segments [ie, S2-S3 and S4-S5 cytoplasmic loops] involved in adrenergic channel regulation vs other mutations). RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that during childhood (age group: 0-13 years) men had >2-fold (P < .003) increased risk for ACA/SCD than did women, whereas after the onset of adolescence the risk for ACA/SCD was similar between men and women (hazard ratio = 0.89 [P = .64]). The presence of cytoplasmic-loop mutations was associated with a 2.7-fold (P < .001) increased risk for ACA/SCD among women, but it did not affect the risk among men (hazard ratio 1.37; P = .26). Time-dependent syncope was associated with a more pronounced risk-increase among men than among women (hazard ratio 4.73 [P < .001] and 2.43 [P = .02], respectively), whereas a prolonged corrected QT interval (≥ 500 ms) was associated with a higher risk among women than among men. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the combined assessment of clinical and mutation location/functional data can be used to identify sex-specific risk factors for life-threatening events for patients with LQT1.

Examination of the effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on health-related quality of life: based on results from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Trial-II.

While implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) improve survival, their benefit in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is negligible. To examine how shocks and congestive heart failure (CHF) mediate the effect of ICDs on HRQOL. The US patients from the MADIT-II (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Trial-II) trial (n = 983) were randomized to receive an ICD or medical treatment only. HRQOL was assessed using the Health Utility Index 3 at baseline and 3, 12, 24, and 36 months following randomization. Logistic regressions were used to test for the effect of ICDs on the CHF indicator, and linear regressions were used to examine the effect of ICD shocks and CHF on HRQOL in living patients. We used a Monte Carlo simulation and a parametric Weibull distribution survival model to test for the effect of selective attrition. Observations were clustered by patients and robust standard errors (RSEs) were used to control for the non-independence of multiple observations provided by the same patient. Patients in the ICD arm had 41% higher odds of experiencing CHF since their last assessment compared with those in the control arm (RSE = 0.19, p = 0.01). Developing CHF reduced HRQOL at the subsequent visit by 0.07 (p < 0.01). Having ICD shocks reduced overall HRQOL by 0.04 (p = 0.04) at the subsequent assessment. The negative effect of ICD firing on HRQOL was an order of magnitude greater than the effect of CHF. A higher prevalence of CHF and shocks among patients with ICDs and their negative effect on HRQOL may partially explain the lack of HRQOL benefit of ICD therapy.

A quantitative assessment of T-wave morphology in LQT1, LQT2, and healthy individuals based on Holter recording technology.

BACKGROUND: The clinical course and the precipitating risk factors in the congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) are genotype specific. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to develop a computer algorithm allowing for electrocardiogram (ECG)-based identification and differentiation of LQT1 and LQT2 carriers. METHODS: Twelve-lead ECG Holter monitor recordings were acquired in 49 LQT1 carriers, 25 LQT2 carriers, and 38 healthy subjects as controls. The cardiac beats were clustered based on heart-rate bin method. Scalar and vectorial repolarization parameters were compared for similar heart rates among study groups. The Q to Tpeak (QTpeak), the Tpeak to Tend interval, T-wave magnitude and T-loop morphology were automatically quantified using custom-made algorithms. RESULTS: QTpeak from lead II and the right slope of the T-wave were the most discriminant parameters for differentiating the 3 groups using prespecified heart rate bin (75.0 to 77.5 beats/min). The predictive model utilizing these scalar parameters was validated using the entire spectrum of heart rates. Both scalar and vectorcardiographic models provided very effective identification of tested subjects in heart rates between 60 and 100 beats/min, whereas they had limited performance during tachycardia and slightly better discrimination in bradycardia. In the 60 to 100 beats/min heart rate range, the best 2-variable model identified correctly 89% of healthy subjects, 84% of LQT1 carriers, and 92% of LQT2 carriers. A model including 3 parameters based purely on scalar ECG parameters could correctly identify 90% of the population (89% of healthy subjects, 90% of LQT1 carriers, and 92% of LQT2 carriers). CONCLUSION: Automatic algorithm quantifying T-wave morphology discriminates LQT1 and LQT2 carriers and healthy subjects with high accuracy. Such computerized ECG methodology could assist physicians evaluating subjects suspected for LQTS.

The cost effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT)-II.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the cost implications of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), using utilization, cost, and survival data from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT)-II. BACKGROUND: This trial showed that prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator reduces the rate of mortality in patients who experienced a previous myocardial infarction and low left ventricular ejection fraction. Given the size of the eligible population, the cost effectiveness of the ICD has substantial implications. METHODS: Our research comprises the cost-effectiveness component of the randomized controlled trial, MADIT-II, based on utilization, cost, and survival information from 1,095 U.S. patients who were assigned randomly to receive an ICD or conventional medical care. Utilization data were converted to costs using a variety of national and hospital-specific data. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (iCER) was calculated as the difference in discounted costs divided by the difference in discounted life expectancy within 3.5 years. Secondary analyses included projections of survival (using three alternative assumptions), corresponding cost assumptions, and the resulting cost-effectiveness ratios until 12 years after randomization. RESULTS: During the 3.5-year period of the study, the average survival gain for the defibrillator arm was 0.167 years (2 months), the additional costs were 39,200 dollars, and the iCER was 235,000 dollars per year-of-life saved. In three alternative projections to 12 years, this ratio ranged from 78,600 dollars to 114,000 dollars. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated cost per life-year saved by the ICD in the MADIT-II study is relatively high at 3.5 years but is projected to be substantially lower over the course of longer time horizons.

Cost-effectiveness of implanted defibrillators in young people with inherited cardiac arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: The implanted cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has been shown to improve survival in adult patients with high risk acquired cardiac disease, with a cost-effectiveness ratio in the range of $30,000 to $185,000 per quality-adjusted-life-year saved. However, data on the benefit and cost-effectiveness of device therapy in high-risk patients with inherited cardiac disorders are limited. METHODS: We developed two separate computer-based analytical models to compare non-ICD with ICD therapy in patients (age range: 10-75 years) with long QT syndrome (LQTS) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). In each disease entity patients were stratified into low-risk (no known risk factors); high-risk (known risk factors [primary prevention]); and very high-risk (prior near-fatal events [secondary prevention]). Net costs were defined as the difference between costs resulting from treatment of the disease and savings due to gained productivity attributable to prevention of sudden cardiac death. Outcome was defined as costs per quality-adjusted life-years saved. RESULTS: In LQTS, defibrillator therapy was shown to be cost effective in high-risk male patients (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER]=$3328 per quality-adjusted-life-year saved), and cost saving in high-risk females (ICER=$7102 gained per quality-adjusted-life-year saved) and very high-risk males and females (ICER=$15,483 and 19,393 gained per quality-adjusted-life-year saved, respectively). In HCM, defibrillator therapy was cost saving in both male and female high-risk (ICER=$17,892 and $17,526 gained per quality-adjusted-life-year saved, respectively) and very high-risk (ICER $22,944 and $22,329 gained per quality-adjusted-life-year saved, respectively) patients. Defibrillator therapy was not shown to be cost effective in low-risk patients with either LQTS or HCM (ICER in the range of $400,000 to $600,000 lost per quality-adjusted-life-year saved). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the results in each risk group. CONCLUSIONS: In appropriately selected patients with inherited cardiac disorders, early intervention with ICD therapy is cost-effective to cost saving due to added years of gained productivity when the lifespan of an individual at risk is considered.

Assessment of the stability of the individual-based correction of QT interval for heart rate.

BACKGROUND: Modeling the relationship between QT intervals and previous R-R values remains a challenge of modern quantitative electrocardiography. The technique based on an individual regression model computed from a set of QT-R-R measurements is presented as a promising alternative. However, a large set of QT-R-R measurements is not always available in clinical trials and there is no study that has investigated the minimum number of QT-R-R measurements needed to obtain a reliable individual QT-R-R model. In this study, we propose guidelines to ensure appropriate use of the regression technique for heart rate correction of QT intervals. METHOD: Holter recordings from 205 healthy subjects were included in the study. QT-R-R relationships were modeled using both linear and parabolic regression techniques. Using a bootstrapping technique, we computed the stability of the individual correction models as a function of the number of measurements, the range of heart rate, and the variance of R-R values. RESULTS: The results show that the stability of QT-R-R individual models was dependent on three factors: the number of measurements included in its design, the heart-rate range used to design the model, and the T-wave amplitude. Practically our results showed that a set of 400 QT-R-R measurements with R-R values ranging from 600 to 1000 ms ensure a stable and reliable individual correction model if the amplitude of the T wave is at least 0.3 mV. Reducing the range of heart rate or the number of measurements may significantly impact the correction model. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that a large number of QT-R-R measurements (approximately 400) is required to ensure reliable individual correction of QT intervals for heart rate.

Electrocardiographic identification of drug-induced QT prolongation: assessment by different recording and measurement methods.

BACKGROUND: Careful assessment of QT interval prolongation is required before novel drugs are approved by regulatory authorities. The choice of the most appropriate method of electrocardiogram (ECG) acquisition and QT/RR interval measurement in clinical trials requires better understanding of the differences among currently available approaches. This study compared standard and Holter-derived 12-lead ECGs for utility in detecting sotalol-induced QT/QTc and RR changes. Manual methods (digitizing pad and digital on-screen calipers) were compared for precision of QT and RR interval measurement. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixteen hundred pairs of serial 12-lead digital ECGs were recorded simultaneously by standard resting ECG device and by continuous 12-lead digital Holter over 3 days in 39 healthy male and female volunteers. No therapy was given on the 1st day followed by 160 mg and 320 mg of sotalol on the 2nd and 3rd day, respectively. Holter-derived and standard ECGs produced nearly identical sotalol-induced QT/QTc and RR changes from baseline, as did the manual digipad and on-screen caliper measurements. The variability of on-screen QT measurement in this study was greater than that of digipad. CONCLUSIONS: Digital 12-lead Holter and standard 12-lead ECG recorders, as well as the manual digitizing pad and digital on-screen calipers, are of equal utility for the assessment of drug-induced change from baseline in QT and RR interval, although the variability of the on-screen method in this study was greater than of the digipad.

Noninvasive risk stratification in postinfarction patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and methodology of the MADIT II noninvasive electrocardiology substudy.

Sudden cardiac death occurs as a result of a complex interplay of changes in myocardial substrate, imbalance of autonomic regulation of the heart, and myocardial vulnerability. Noninvasive electrocardiology serves as a comprehensive tool for investigating factors representing mechanistic pathways leading to cardiac events. Heart rate variability, nonlinear dynamics of heart rate, and heart rate turbulence provide insight into autonomic control of the heart. Prognostic value of these parameters in postinfarction patients is well established for predicting cardiac death, but there is less evidence for their association with sudden death or arrhythmic events. Electrical manifestation of changes in myocardial substrate include QRS and QTc prolongation, presence of conduction disturbances, presence of late potentials, abnormalities of repolarization morphology, and presence of nonsinus rhythm, namely atrial fibrillation. Electrocardiogram (ECG) measures reflecting myocardial vulnerability to arrhythmias include frequent ventricular premature beats, T wave alternans, or QT variability. Prognostic significance of these parameters is documented in studies focused mostly on them as individual markers of risk. The noninvasive electrocardiology substudy of the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II (MADIT II) allows for simultaneous analysis of several of the above ECG markers of risk and will provide insight about relative contribution of mechanistic pathways leading to cardiac death in postinfarction patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Combination of a standard 12-lead ECG and 10-minute high-resolution Holter recordings serves to evaluate the prognostic significance of noninvasive electrocardiology parameters for mortality in patients randomized to conventional treatment and for arrhythmic events in patients randomized to implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.