Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Hepatogastroenterology ; 62(138): 303-8, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25916054

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This multicenter and single arm phase II clinical trial was performed to examine the safety and efficacy of modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) as adjuvant treatment after resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. METHODOLOGY: Patients who had undergone R0-1 resection of liver metastases were assigned to 12 cycles of mFOLFOX6. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: We enrolled 49 cases and analyzed adverse events in 48 cases, since in one patient cancer recurred before starting treatment. As to the relative dose intensity, 5-FU was 78.8%, and oxaliplatin was 75.9%. Adverse events of Grade 3 and above includ- ed 18 cases of neutropenia (37.5%), 4 cases of sensory neuropathy (8.3%), 4 cases of thrombocytopenia (8.3%) and 4 cases of allergy (8.3%), and there were no cases of fatality caused by adverse events. The most difference of adverse event compared with MOSAIC trial (Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin/5FU-LV in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer) was thrombocytopenia. The 2-year DFS was 59.2% (95% CI: 36.7-78.4) in the 49 enrolled cases. CONCLUSION: mFOLFOX6 after hepatectomy was tolerable. And mFOLFOX6 also seemed to improve DFS. mFOLFOX is one of the options for such patients and appears promising as an adjuvant treatment.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Hepatectomia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Esquema de Medicação , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Hepatectomia/efeitos adversos , Hepatectomia/mortalidade , Humanos , Japão , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Oxaliplatina , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Pancreas ; 40(6): 946-50, 2011 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21747315

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the benefits between endoscopic drainage and surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct for patients with chronic calcified pancreatitis. METHODS: A total of 68 patients were classified into endoscopic (n = 34) or surgical (n = 34) treatment groups. Patients receiving endoscopic treatment were further divided into 2 subgroups: a short-period group, patients who could discontinue serial pancreatic stenting within 1 year (n = 19); and a long-period group, patients who needed pancreatic drainage by serial endoscopic stenting for more than 1 year (n = 15). The medical records of these patients were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Hospital stays, frequency of hospitalizations, and medical expense were similar between the short-period endoscopic treatment group and surgery group. On the other hand, patients in the long-period endoscopic treatment group required significantly longer hospital stays, more frequent hospitalizations, and had higher medical expenses than the short-period endoscopic treatment group as well as than the surgery group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent serial endoscopic stenting for more than 1 year showed no benefit compared with surgical treatment in terms of the frequency of hospital stays and medical costs.


Assuntos
Calcinose/cirurgia , Calcinose/terapia , Pancreatite Crônica/cirurgia , Pancreatite Crônica/terapia , Stents , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Calcinose/economia , Drenagem/economia , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/economia , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Litotripsia/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ductos Pancreáticos/cirurgia , Pancreatite Crônica/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents/economia , Fatores de Tempo
3.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci ; 17(6): 745-51, 2010 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19789835

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The Frey procedure, the coring out of the pancreatic head and longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy, is a safe, easy, and reliable method to solve most of the problems associated with chronic pancreatitis. During long-term follow up, unexpected relapse in the pancreatic tail was encountered. The pattern of failure and the rationale for a new procedure to treat or prevent such relapse were investigated. METHODS: From 1992 to 2008, 71 patients with chronic pancreatitis underwent the Frey procedure at Tohoku University Hospital. The etiology was alcoholic in 92.6% of them, followed in incidence by idiopathic and hereditary chronic pancreatitis. In the primary operation, besides the Frey procedure, combined resection of the pancreatic tail was performed in three patients, and choledochoduodenostomy was performed in one patient. The follow-up rate was 92.9%, with a median period of 46 months. RESULTS: The incidence of early postoperative complications was 18.4%, with one reoperation for gastrointestinal bleeding from the splenic artery. Pain control was achieved in all patients and there was no operative mortality. During the long-term follow up of 62 patients with the Frey procedure, eight patients had relapse of inflammation and required reoperation. Five of these eight patients had a pseudocyst in the pancreatic tail and underwent distal pancreatectomy (DP). CONCLUSIONS: Relapse occurred in alcoholic middle-aged male patients, and in the patients with hereditary and idiopathic pancreatitis. Frey-DP and Frey-spleen-preserving DP (SPDP) procedures can be performed safely and effectively to treat the relapse and to prevent relapse in the pancreatic tail.


Assuntos
Pancreatectomia/métodos , Pancreaticojejunostomia/métodos , Pancreatite Crônica/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Japão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prevenção Secundária , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg ; 14(5): 434-40, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17909710

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Hilar cholangiocarcinoma is the one of the most difficult carcinomas to diagnose because of the localization of the main tumor at the hepatic hilus, and because of the complex anatomy of the biliary, artery, and portal systems. To perform a curative operation, it is important to evaluate the extent of carcinoma and the resectability. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma often extends along the axis of the bile duct. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogaraphy (PTC) and/or endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) are usually performed to diagnose the extent of the hilar cholangiocarcinoma. However, computed tomography (CT) was thought not to be useful because its resolution is poor. Now that multidetector row CT (MDCT) and high-performance imaging systems are available, the diagnostic strategy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma has changed. METHODS: In this study, we analyzed the preoperative diagnostic imaging of 24 consecutive patients whose hilar cholangiocarcinoma was confirmed by histopathological examination. All patients were submitted to 16-channel MDCT, except for those with an allergy to iodine contrast medium. The data obtained from MDCT were analyzed and checked by both radiologists and surgeons, using multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) images. RESULTS: The accuracy of diagnosis of horizontal spreading was 80.9% and that of vertical spreading was 100%. However, the sensitivity for lymph node metastasis was insufficient. Based on the data from MDCT and other examinations, all patients underwent surgery. Curative operation was performed in 15 patients (62.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that 16-channel MDCT is reliable for the diagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma, especially prior to bile duct drainage. Thus, it is important to perform MDCT when patients with obstructive jaundice are encountered.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagem , Ductos Biliares Intra-Hepáticos/diagnóstico por imagem , Colangiocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Idoso , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/cirurgia , Ductos Biliares Intra-Hepáticos/cirurgia , Colangiocarcinoma/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA